Patterns of Diagnostic Testing for Oesophagogastric Cancer-Related Symptoms in Australian General Practice.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Shaoke Lei, Brent Venning, Alison Pearce, Alex Lee, Jon Emery
{"title":"Patterns of Diagnostic Testing for Oesophagogastric Cancer-Related Symptoms in Australian General Practice.","authors":"Shaoke Lei, Brent Venning, Alison Pearce, Alex Lee, Jon Emery","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oesophagogastric (OG) cancer-associated symptoms are common in primary care, but most research has focused on patients with a confirmed OG cancer diagnosis, rather than those presenting with symptoms for the first time.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine diagnostic testing patterns for upper gastrointestinal symptoms linked to OG cancer.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Retrospective cohort study used a linked primary care database. It included de-identified patients aged 55 and older who presented with symptoms suggestive of OG cancer between 2008 and 2022. We analysed the proportion of patients who underwent pathology, imaging, referral, endoscopy, or a test of treatment. Differences across socioeconomic groups were also examined, along with the proportion of patients diagnosed with OG cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort consisted of 44,402 patients, of whom 126 (0.28%) were diagnosed with OG cancer within 12 months of presentation. Reflux was the most common symptom (57%), followed by nausea (11%). Patients over 75 were less likely to be investigated or referred (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.56-0.62, p < 0.001). Those from less disadvantaged areas were 1.4 times more likely to be investigated (OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.36-1.53, p < 0.001). Patients on 'test of treatment' medications were less likely to receive further investigation (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.63-0.69, p < 0.001). Multiple symptoms and visits increased the likelihood of investigation (OR = 2.77, 95% CI: 2.55-3.00, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant variations in diagnostic testing could contribute to disparities in OG cancer outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0621","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Oesophagogastric (OG) cancer-associated symptoms are common in primary care, but most research has focused on patients with a confirmed OG cancer diagnosis, rather than those presenting with symptoms for the first time.

Aim: To examine diagnostic testing patterns for upper gastrointestinal symptoms linked to OG cancer.

Design and setting: Retrospective cohort study used a linked primary care database. It included de-identified patients aged 55 and older who presented with symptoms suggestive of OG cancer between 2008 and 2022. We analysed the proportion of patients who underwent pathology, imaging, referral, endoscopy, or a test of treatment. Differences across socioeconomic groups were also examined, along with the proportion of patients diagnosed with OG cancer.

Results: The study cohort consisted of 44,402 patients, of whom 126 (0.28%) were diagnosed with OG cancer within 12 months of presentation. Reflux was the most common symptom (57%), followed by nausea (11%). Patients over 75 were less likely to be investigated or referred (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.56-0.62, p < 0.001). Those from less disadvantaged areas were 1.4 times more likely to be investigated (OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.36-1.53, p < 0.001). Patients on 'test of treatment' medications were less likely to receive further investigation (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.63-0.69, p < 0.001). Multiple symptoms and visits increased the likelihood of investigation (OR = 2.77, 95% CI: 2.55-3.00, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Significant variations in diagnostic testing could contribute to disparities in OG cancer outcomes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信