Shaoke Lei, Brent Venning, Alison Pearce, Alex Lee, Jon Emery
{"title":"Patterns of Diagnostic Testing for Oesophagogastric Cancer-Related Symptoms in Australian General Practice.","authors":"Shaoke Lei, Brent Venning, Alison Pearce, Alex Lee, Jon Emery","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oesophagogastric (OG) cancer-associated symptoms are common in primary care, but most research has focused on patients with a confirmed OG cancer diagnosis, rather than those presenting with symptoms for the first time.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine diagnostic testing patterns for upper gastrointestinal symptoms linked to OG cancer.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Retrospective cohort study used a linked primary care database. It included de-identified patients aged 55 and older who presented with symptoms suggestive of OG cancer between 2008 and 2022. We analysed the proportion of patients who underwent pathology, imaging, referral, endoscopy, or a test of treatment. Differences across socioeconomic groups were also examined, along with the proportion of patients diagnosed with OG cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort consisted of 44,402 patients, of whom 126 (0.28%) were diagnosed with OG cancer within 12 months of presentation. Reflux was the most common symptom (57%), followed by nausea (11%). Patients over 75 were less likely to be investigated or referred (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.56-0.62, p < 0.001). Those from less disadvantaged areas were 1.4 times more likely to be investigated (OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.36-1.53, p < 0.001). Patients on 'test of treatment' medications were less likely to receive further investigation (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.63-0.69, p < 0.001). Multiple symptoms and visits increased the likelihood of investigation (OR = 2.77, 95% CI: 2.55-3.00, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant variations in diagnostic testing could contribute to disparities in OG cancer outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0621","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Oesophagogastric (OG) cancer-associated symptoms are common in primary care, but most research has focused on patients with a confirmed OG cancer diagnosis, rather than those presenting with symptoms for the first time.
Aim: To examine diagnostic testing patterns for upper gastrointestinal symptoms linked to OG cancer.
Design and setting: Retrospective cohort study used a linked primary care database. It included de-identified patients aged 55 and older who presented with symptoms suggestive of OG cancer between 2008 and 2022. We analysed the proportion of patients who underwent pathology, imaging, referral, endoscopy, or a test of treatment. Differences across socioeconomic groups were also examined, along with the proportion of patients diagnosed with OG cancer.
Results: The study cohort consisted of 44,402 patients, of whom 126 (0.28%) were diagnosed with OG cancer within 12 months of presentation. Reflux was the most common symptom (57%), followed by nausea (11%). Patients over 75 were less likely to be investigated or referred (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.56-0.62, p < 0.001). Those from less disadvantaged areas were 1.4 times more likely to be investigated (OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.36-1.53, p < 0.001). Patients on 'test of treatment' medications were less likely to receive further investigation (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.63-0.69, p < 0.001). Multiple symptoms and visits increased the likelihood of investigation (OR = 2.77, 95% CI: 2.55-3.00, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Significant variations in diagnostic testing could contribute to disparities in OG cancer outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide.
BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.