Liz Down, Melissa Barlow, Sarah Bailey, Luke Timothy Allan Mounce, Samuel Merriel, Jessica Watson, Ge Chen, Tanimola Martins
{"title":"Anaemia, ethnicity and cancer incidence: a retrospective cohort study in primary care.","authors":"Liz Down, Melissa Barlow, Sarah Bailey, Luke Timothy Allan Mounce, Samuel Merriel, Jessica Watson, Ge Chen, Tanimola Martins","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Haemoglobin, Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV), and rates of Iron Deficiency Anaemia (IDA) are used in primary care to investigate possible cancer symptoms, especially for gastro-intestinal cancers. Underlying ethnic differences in typical test results could lead to inequalities in the diagnosis of cancer in primary care. Aim To investigate the distribution of low haemoglobin, low MCV and IDA, and the rate of cancer diagnosis in patients with abnormal results, by ethnic group. Design and Setting Retrospective cohort study using routine data collected in primary care in England. Included patients had blood tests between 2010 and 2017 and were at least 40 years old with no prior cancer diagnosis. Method Multi-level logistic regression was used to investigate the relationship between blood test results and cancer risk for patients in different ethnic groups. Results Low haemoglobin, low MCV, and IDA were effective in identifying patients with increased cancer risk, particularly for gastro-intestinal cancers. MCV was found to be a stronger cancer indicator for White patients (diagnostic OR 3.84) than for Asian (OR 1.86) or Black patients (OR 1.75). Conclusion There are some small differences in cancer risk for patients with abnormal test results, when considering patient ethnic group, especially for MCV. This is likely to be a consequence of the underlying difference in typical MCV values for patients from different ethnic groups. Further investigation is required to understand the aetiology of these differences in order to disentangle any effects on outcomes for patients with cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0762","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background Haemoglobin, Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV), and rates of Iron Deficiency Anaemia (IDA) are used in primary care to investigate possible cancer symptoms, especially for gastro-intestinal cancers. Underlying ethnic differences in typical test results could lead to inequalities in the diagnosis of cancer in primary care. Aim To investigate the distribution of low haemoglobin, low MCV and IDA, and the rate of cancer diagnosis in patients with abnormal results, by ethnic group. Design and Setting Retrospective cohort study using routine data collected in primary care in England. Included patients had blood tests between 2010 and 2017 and were at least 40 years old with no prior cancer diagnosis. Method Multi-level logistic regression was used to investigate the relationship between blood test results and cancer risk for patients in different ethnic groups. Results Low haemoglobin, low MCV, and IDA were effective in identifying patients with increased cancer risk, particularly for gastro-intestinal cancers. MCV was found to be a stronger cancer indicator for White patients (diagnostic OR 3.84) than for Asian (OR 1.86) or Black patients (OR 1.75). Conclusion There are some small differences in cancer risk for patients with abnormal test results, when considering patient ethnic group, especially for MCV. This is likely to be a consequence of the underlying difference in typical MCV values for patients from different ethnic groups. Further investigation is required to understand the aetiology of these differences in order to disentangle any effects on outcomes for patients with cancer.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide.
BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.