Multiparametric MRI-based Interpretable Machine Learning Radiomics Model for Distinguishing Between Luminal and Non-luminal Tumors in Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Study.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yi Zhou, Guihan Lin, Weiyue Chen, Yongjun Chen, Changsheng Shi, Zhiyi Peng, Ling Chen, Shibin Cai, Ying Pan, Minjiang Chen, Chenying Lu, Jiansong Ji, Shuzheng Chen
{"title":"Multiparametric MRI-based Interpretable Machine Learning Radiomics Model for Distinguishing Between Luminal and Non-luminal Tumors in Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Study.","authors":"Yi Zhou, Guihan Lin, Weiyue Chen, Yongjun Chen, Changsheng Shi, Zhiyi Peng, Ling Chen, Shibin Cai, Ying Pan, Minjiang Chen, Chenying Lu, Jiansong Ji, Shuzheng Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.03.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>To construct and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) radiomics model derived from multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images to differentiate between luminal and non-luminal breast cancer (BC) subtypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled 1098 BC participants from four medical centers, categorized into a training cohort (n = 580) and validation cohorts 1-3 (n = 252, 89, and 177, respectively). Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics features, including T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging, were extracted. Five ML algorithms were applied to develop various radiomics models, from which the best performing model was identified. A ML-based combined model including optimal radiomics features and clinical predictors was constructed, with performance assessed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) method was utilized to assess model interpretability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tumor size and MR-reported lymph node status were chosen as significant clinical variables. Thirteen radiomics features were identified from multiparametric MRI images. The extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) radiomics model performed the best, achieving area under the curves (AUCs) of 0.941, 0.903, 0.862, and 0.894 across training and validation cohorts 1-3, respectively. The XGBoost combined model showed favorable discriminative power, with AUCs of 0.956, 0.912, 0.894, and 0.906 in training and validation cohorts 1-3, respectively. The SHAP visualization facilitated global interpretation, identifying \"ADC_wavelet-HLH_glszm_ZoneEntropy\" and \"DCE_wavelet-HLL_gldm_DependenceVariance\" as the most significant features for the model's predictions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The XGBoost combined model derived from multiparametric MRI may proficiently differentiate between luminal and non-luminal BC and aid in treatment decision-making.</p><p><strong>Critical relevance statement: </strong>An interpretable machine learning radiomics model can preoperatively predict luminal and non-luminal subtypes in breast cancer, thereby aiding therapeutic decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2025.03.010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and objectives: To construct and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) radiomics model derived from multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images to differentiate between luminal and non-luminal breast cancer (BC) subtypes.

Methods: This study enrolled 1098 BC participants from four medical centers, categorized into a training cohort (n = 580) and validation cohorts 1-3 (n = 252, 89, and 177, respectively). Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics features, including T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging, were extracted. Five ML algorithms were applied to develop various radiomics models, from which the best performing model was identified. A ML-based combined model including optimal radiomics features and clinical predictors was constructed, with performance assessed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) method was utilized to assess model interpretability.

Results: Tumor size and MR-reported lymph node status were chosen as significant clinical variables. Thirteen radiomics features were identified from multiparametric MRI images. The extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) radiomics model performed the best, achieving area under the curves (AUCs) of 0.941, 0.903, 0.862, and 0.894 across training and validation cohorts 1-3, respectively. The XGBoost combined model showed favorable discriminative power, with AUCs of 0.956, 0.912, 0.894, and 0.906 in training and validation cohorts 1-3, respectively. The SHAP visualization facilitated global interpretation, identifying "ADC_wavelet-HLH_glszm_ZoneEntropy" and "DCE_wavelet-HLL_gldm_DependenceVariance" as the most significant features for the model's predictions.

Conclusion: The XGBoost combined model derived from multiparametric MRI may proficiently differentiate between luminal and non-luminal BC and aid in treatment decision-making.

Critical relevance statement: An interpretable machine learning radiomics model can preoperatively predict luminal and non-luminal subtypes in breast cancer, thereby aiding therapeutic decision-making.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信