Multiparametric MRI-based Interpretable Machine Learning Radiomics Model for Distinguishing Between Luminal and Non-luminal Tumors in Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Study.
IF 3.8 2区 医学Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
{"title":"Multiparametric MRI-based Interpretable Machine Learning Radiomics Model for Distinguishing Between Luminal and Non-luminal Tumors in Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Study.","authors":"Yi Zhou, Guihan Lin, Weiyue Chen, Yongjun Chen, Changsheng Shi, Zhiyi Peng, Ling Chen, Shibin Cai, Ying Pan, Minjiang Chen, Chenying Lu, Jiansong Ji, Shuzheng Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.03.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>To construct and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) radiomics model derived from multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images to differentiate between luminal and non-luminal breast cancer (BC) subtypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled 1098 BC participants from four medical centers, categorized into a training cohort (n = 580) and validation cohorts 1-3 (n = 252, 89, and 177, respectively). Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics features, including T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging, were extracted. Five ML algorithms were applied to develop various radiomics models, from which the best performing model was identified. A ML-based combined model including optimal radiomics features and clinical predictors was constructed, with performance assessed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) method was utilized to assess model interpretability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tumor size and MR-reported lymph node status were chosen as significant clinical variables. Thirteen radiomics features were identified from multiparametric MRI images. The extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) radiomics model performed the best, achieving area under the curves (AUCs) of 0.941, 0.903, 0.862, and 0.894 across training and validation cohorts 1-3, respectively. The XGBoost combined model showed favorable discriminative power, with AUCs of 0.956, 0.912, 0.894, and 0.906 in training and validation cohorts 1-3, respectively. The SHAP visualization facilitated global interpretation, identifying \"ADC_wavelet-HLH_glszm_ZoneEntropy\" and \"DCE_wavelet-HLL_gldm_DependenceVariance\" as the most significant features for the model's predictions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The XGBoost combined model derived from multiparametric MRI may proficiently differentiate between luminal and non-luminal BC and aid in treatment decision-making.</p><p><strong>Critical relevance statement: </strong>An interpretable machine learning radiomics model can preoperatively predict luminal and non-luminal subtypes in breast cancer, thereby aiding therapeutic decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2025.03.010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rationale and objectives: To construct and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) radiomics model derived from multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images to differentiate between luminal and non-luminal breast cancer (BC) subtypes.
Methods: This study enrolled 1098 BC participants from four medical centers, categorized into a training cohort (n = 580) and validation cohorts 1-3 (n = 252, 89, and 177, respectively). Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics features, including T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging, were extracted. Five ML algorithms were applied to develop various radiomics models, from which the best performing model was identified. A ML-based combined model including optimal radiomics features and clinical predictors was constructed, with performance assessed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) method was utilized to assess model interpretability.
Results: Tumor size and MR-reported lymph node status were chosen as significant clinical variables. Thirteen radiomics features were identified from multiparametric MRI images. The extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) radiomics model performed the best, achieving area under the curves (AUCs) of 0.941, 0.903, 0.862, and 0.894 across training and validation cohorts 1-3, respectively. The XGBoost combined model showed favorable discriminative power, with AUCs of 0.956, 0.912, 0.894, and 0.906 in training and validation cohorts 1-3, respectively. The SHAP visualization facilitated global interpretation, identifying "ADC_wavelet-HLH_glszm_ZoneEntropy" and "DCE_wavelet-HLL_gldm_DependenceVariance" as the most significant features for the model's predictions.
Conclusion: The XGBoost combined model derived from multiparametric MRI may proficiently differentiate between luminal and non-luminal BC and aid in treatment decision-making.
Critical relevance statement: An interpretable machine learning radiomics model can preoperatively predict luminal and non-luminal subtypes in breast cancer, thereby aiding therapeutic decision-making.
期刊介绍:
Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.