Jente Wagemans, Bart Dingenen, Stefan Clockaerts, Chris Bleakley
{"title":"Physiotherapists Approach in Lateral Ankle Sprain Rehabilitation: A Survey Study.","authors":"Jente Wagemans, Bart Dingenen, Stefan Clockaerts, Chris Bleakley","doi":"10.1123/jsr.2024-0442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To investigate how physiotherapists approach lateral ankle sprain (LAS) rehabilitation and their rationale for exercise progression. We also sought to determine typical exercise dosage prescribed and the extent to which they rely on objective outcomes for guiding rehabilitation progression and return-to-sports decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We distributed an online survey using Qualtrics. The survey comprised a combination of 23 open and 8 closed questions to capture data on: participant demographics and clinical experience, typical caseload, LAS rehabilitation dosage, with clinical vignettes used to determine the time taken to reach key rehabilitation milestones, use of objective markers to inform rehabilitation progress, and progression to each milestone. Data were analyzed descriptively; open questions were inventoried and categorized. Proportions were then calculated per category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-six physiotherapists from Belgium, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom responded to the survey, of which 23 completed all sections. On average, less than half (46%) of the responding therapists use objective measurements to guide rehabilitation progress. The estimated time to reach key clinical milestones is equivocal among participating physiotherapists. Most physiotherapists use pain and ankle impairments (eg, range of motion and muscle strength) to guide rehabilitation progress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study indicates that progress in LAS rehabilitation is determined subjectively and that not the entire spectrum of impairments is assessed. Physiotherapists should implement more objective measures throughout LAS rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2024-0442","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: To investigate how physiotherapists approach lateral ankle sprain (LAS) rehabilitation and their rationale for exercise progression. We also sought to determine typical exercise dosage prescribed and the extent to which they rely on objective outcomes for guiding rehabilitation progression and return-to-sports decisions.
Methods: We distributed an online survey using Qualtrics. The survey comprised a combination of 23 open and 8 closed questions to capture data on: participant demographics and clinical experience, typical caseload, LAS rehabilitation dosage, with clinical vignettes used to determine the time taken to reach key rehabilitation milestones, use of objective markers to inform rehabilitation progress, and progression to each milestone. Data were analyzed descriptively; open questions were inventoried and categorized. Proportions were then calculated per category.
Results: Ninety-six physiotherapists from Belgium, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom responded to the survey, of which 23 completed all sections. On average, less than half (46%) of the responding therapists use objective measurements to guide rehabilitation progress. The estimated time to reach key clinical milestones is equivocal among participating physiotherapists. Most physiotherapists use pain and ankle impairments (eg, range of motion and muscle strength) to guide rehabilitation progress.
Conclusion: This study indicates that progress in LAS rehabilitation is determined subjectively and that not the entire spectrum of impairments is assessed. Physiotherapists should implement more objective measures throughout LAS rehabilitation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sport Rehabilitation (JSR) is your source for the latest peer-reviewed research in the field of sport rehabilitation. All members of the sports-medicine team will benefit from the wealth of important information in each issue. JSR is completely devoted to the rehabilitation of sport and exercise injuries, regardless of the age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status of the participant.
JSR publishes peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, critically appraised topics (CATs), case studies/series, and technical reports that directly affect the management and rehabilitation of injuries incurred during sport-related activities, irrespective of the individual’s age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status. The journal is intended to provide an international, multidisciplinary forum to serve the needs of all members of the sports medicine team, including athletic trainers/therapists, sport physical therapists/physiotherapists, sports medicine physicians, and other health care and medical professionals.