Yara Abdou, Olga Kantor, Jennifer Racz, Lisa Newman, Lori J Pierce, Eric P Winer
{"title":"Prognostic and Predictive Insights From Genomic Assays for Breast Cancer in Diverse Populations: A Review.","authors":"Yara Abdou, Olga Kantor, Jennifer Racz, Lisa Newman, Lori J Pierce, Eric P Winer","doi":"10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.0178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Despite recent declines in breast cancer mortality rates, substantial disparities persist among race and ethnicity groups. Genomic assays are crucial for understanding the biological characteristics of tumors, providing valuable insights into prognosis and treatment response. Their integration into personalized clinical decision-making has notably enhanced outcomes, making these assays particularly valuable for underrepresented populations, which often face disproportionately poorer prognoses. Expanding research to evaluate the performance and predictive value of these assays across diverse groups is essential to ensure equitable benefits for all patients.</p><p><strong>Observations: </strong>This review evaluated the distribution of risk estimates from multigene assays, primarily focusing on 21-, 70-, and 50-gene signature assays, their predictive capabilities and impact on breast cancer recurrence and survival outcomes across race and ethnicity groups. Findings indicate that racial and ethnic disparities in breast cancer outcomes were influenced by a complex interplay of biological, social, and systemic factors. Black women were more likely to have aggressive tumor phenotypes, such as luminal B and basal-like subtypes, which contributed to poorer outcomes. These disparities persist even after adjusting for genomic assay results and molecular subtypes, suggesting that genomic factors alone cannot fully explain differences in clinical outcomes. Although subgroup analyses from 2 randomized clinical trials showed no apparent differences in the 21-gene signature's predictive value across racial groups, further research is needed to ensure that genomic assays are equitably calibrated for diverse populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This review supports genomic assays as valuable tools for informing prognosis and treatment decisions in breast cancer; however, they do not fully capture factors associated with racial and ethnic disparities in outcomes. A comprehensive approach that integrates genomic data with a deeper understanding of social determinants and systemic inequities is essential to ensure all patients benefit equitably from advancements in personalized medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":48661,"journal":{"name":"Jama Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":28.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jama Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.0178","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Importance: Despite recent declines in breast cancer mortality rates, substantial disparities persist among race and ethnicity groups. Genomic assays are crucial for understanding the biological characteristics of tumors, providing valuable insights into prognosis and treatment response. Their integration into personalized clinical decision-making has notably enhanced outcomes, making these assays particularly valuable for underrepresented populations, which often face disproportionately poorer prognoses. Expanding research to evaluate the performance and predictive value of these assays across diverse groups is essential to ensure equitable benefits for all patients.
Observations: This review evaluated the distribution of risk estimates from multigene assays, primarily focusing on 21-, 70-, and 50-gene signature assays, their predictive capabilities and impact on breast cancer recurrence and survival outcomes across race and ethnicity groups. Findings indicate that racial and ethnic disparities in breast cancer outcomes were influenced by a complex interplay of biological, social, and systemic factors. Black women were more likely to have aggressive tumor phenotypes, such as luminal B and basal-like subtypes, which contributed to poorer outcomes. These disparities persist even after adjusting for genomic assay results and molecular subtypes, suggesting that genomic factors alone cannot fully explain differences in clinical outcomes. Although subgroup analyses from 2 randomized clinical trials showed no apparent differences in the 21-gene signature's predictive value across racial groups, further research is needed to ensure that genomic assays are equitably calibrated for diverse populations.
Conclusions and relevance: This review supports genomic assays as valuable tools for informing prognosis and treatment decisions in breast cancer; however, they do not fully capture factors associated with racial and ethnic disparities in outcomes. A comprehensive approach that integrates genomic data with a deeper understanding of social determinants and systemic inequities is essential to ensure all patients benefit equitably from advancements in personalized medicine.
期刊介绍:
At JAMA Oncology, our primary goal is to contribute to the advancement of oncology research and enhance patient care. As a leading journal in the field, we strive to publish influential original research, opinions, and reviews that push the boundaries of oncology science.
Our mission is to serve as the definitive resource for scientists, clinicians, and trainees in oncology globally. Through our innovative and timely scientific and educational content, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of cancer pathogenesis and the latest treatment advancements to our readers.
We are dedicated to effectively disseminating the findings of significant clinical research, major scientific breakthroughs, actionable discoveries, and state-of-the-art treatment pathways to the oncology community. Our ultimate objective is to facilitate the translation of new knowledge into tangible clinical benefits for individuals living with and surviving cancer.