Prognostic and Predictive Insights From Genomic Assays for Breast Cancer in Diverse Populations: A Review.

IF 28.4 1区 医学 Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Yara Abdou, Olga Kantor, Jennifer Racz, Lisa Newman, Lori J Pierce, Eric P Winer
{"title":"Prognostic and Predictive Insights From Genomic Assays for Breast Cancer in Diverse Populations: A Review.","authors":"Yara Abdou, Olga Kantor, Jennifer Racz, Lisa Newman, Lori J Pierce, Eric P Winer","doi":"10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.0178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Despite recent declines in breast cancer mortality rates, substantial disparities persist among race and ethnicity groups. Genomic assays are crucial for understanding the biological characteristics of tumors, providing valuable insights into prognosis and treatment response. Their integration into personalized clinical decision-making has notably enhanced outcomes, making these assays particularly valuable for underrepresented populations, which often face disproportionately poorer prognoses. Expanding research to evaluate the performance and predictive value of these assays across diverse groups is essential to ensure equitable benefits for all patients.</p><p><strong>Observations: </strong>This review evaluated the distribution of risk estimates from multigene assays, primarily focusing on 21-, 70-, and 50-gene signature assays, their predictive capabilities and impact on breast cancer recurrence and survival outcomes across race and ethnicity groups. Findings indicate that racial and ethnic disparities in breast cancer outcomes were influenced by a complex interplay of biological, social, and systemic factors. Black women were more likely to have aggressive tumor phenotypes, such as luminal B and basal-like subtypes, which contributed to poorer outcomes. These disparities persist even after adjusting for genomic assay results and molecular subtypes, suggesting that genomic factors alone cannot fully explain differences in clinical outcomes. Although subgroup analyses from 2 randomized clinical trials showed no apparent differences in the 21-gene signature's predictive value across racial groups, further research is needed to ensure that genomic assays are equitably calibrated for diverse populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This review supports genomic assays as valuable tools for informing prognosis and treatment decisions in breast cancer; however, they do not fully capture factors associated with racial and ethnic disparities in outcomes. A comprehensive approach that integrates genomic data with a deeper understanding of social determinants and systemic inequities is essential to ensure all patients benefit equitably from advancements in personalized medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":48661,"journal":{"name":"Jama Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":28.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jama Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.0178","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Despite recent declines in breast cancer mortality rates, substantial disparities persist among race and ethnicity groups. Genomic assays are crucial for understanding the biological characteristics of tumors, providing valuable insights into prognosis and treatment response. Their integration into personalized clinical decision-making has notably enhanced outcomes, making these assays particularly valuable for underrepresented populations, which often face disproportionately poorer prognoses. Expanding research to evaluate the performance and predictive value of these assays across diverse groups is essential to ensure equitable benefits for all patients.

Observations: This review evaluated the distribution of risk estimates from multigene assays, primarily focusing on 21-, 70-, and 50-gene signature assays, their predictive capabilities and impact on breast cancer recurrence and survival outcomes across race and ethnicity groups. Findings indicate that racial and ethnic disparities in breast cancer outcomes were influenced by a complex interplay of biological, social, and systemic factors. Black women were more likely to have aggressive tumor phenotypes, such as luminal B and basal-like subtypes, which contributed to poorer outcomes. These disparities persist even after adjusting for genomic assay results and molecular subtypes, suggesting that genomic factors alone cannot fully explain differences in clinical outcomes. Although subgroup analyses from 2 randomized clinical trials showed no apparent differences in the 21-gene signature's predictive value across racial groups, further research is needed to ensure that genomic assays are equitably calibrated for diverse populations.

Conclusions and relevance: This review supports genomic assays as valuable tools for informing prognosis and treatment decisions in breast cancer; however, they do not fully capture factors associated with racial and ethnic disparities in outcomes. A comprehensive approach that integrates genomic data with a deeper understanding of social determinants and systemic inequities is essential to ensure all patients benefit equitably from advancements in personalized medicine.

重要性:尽管近年来乳腺癌死亡率有所下降,但不同种族和族裔群体之间仍存在巨大差异。基因组检测对了解肿瘤的生物学特征至关重要,可提供有关预后和治疗反应的宝贵信息。将基因组检测纳入个性化的临床决策中可显著提高疗效,因此这些检测对代表性不足的人群尤为重要,因为这些人群的预后往往差得不成比例。扩大研究范围,评估这些检测方法在不同群体中的性能和预测价值,对于确保所有患者公平获益至关重要:本综述评估了多基因检测的风险估计值分布情况,主要侧重于 21、70 和 50 基因特征检测、其预测能力以及对不同种族和族裔群体乳腺癌复发和生存结果的影响。研究结果表明,乳腺癌结果中的种族和民族差异受到生物、社会和系统因素复杂的相互作用的影响。黑人妇女更有可能患有侵袭性肿瘤表型,如管腔B型和基底样亚型,这导致了较差的预后。即使对基因组检测结果和分子亚型进行调整后,这些差异依然存在,这表明仅靠基因组因素并不能完全解释临床结果的差异。尽管两项随机临床试验的亚组分析表明,21 个基因特征的预测价值在不同种族群体中没有明显差异,但仍需进一步研究,以确保基因组测定能公平地校准不同人群:本综述支持将基因组检测作为乳腺癌预后和治疗决策的重要参考工具;然而,基因组检测并不能完全捕捉到与种族和民族差异结果相关的因素。为了确保所有患者都能公平地从个性化医疗的进步中获益,必须采用一种综合方法,将基因组数据与对社会决定因素和系统性不平等的深入了解结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jama Oncology
Jama Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
37.50
自引率
1.80%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: At JAMA Oncology, our primary goal is to contribute to the advancement of oncology research and enhance patient care. As a leading journal in the field, we strive to publish influential original research, opinions, and reviews that push the boundaries of oncology science. Our mission is to serve as the definitive resource for scientists, clinicians, and trainees in oncology globally. Through our innovative and timely scientific and educational content, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of cancer pathogenesis and the latest treatment advancements to our readers. We are dedicated to effectively disseminating the findings of significant clinical research, major scientific breakthroughs, actionable discoveries, and state-of-the-art treatment pathways to the oncology community. Our ultimate objective is to facilitate the translation of new knowledge into tangible clinical benefits for individuals living with and surviving cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信