Neighborhood Safety and Hypertension Risk: A Systematic Review.

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yeonwoo Kim, Soeun Jang, Shaikh Ullahansari, Jimmy Vo, Kate Hyun, Paul J Fadel
{"title":"Neighborhood Safety and Hypertension Risk: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Yeonwoo Kim, Soeun Jang, Shaikh Ullahansari, Jimmy Vo, Kate Hyun, Paul J Fadel","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.124.035381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Responding to the increasing focus on residential environments, our systematic review aimed to consolidate existing empirical evidence regarding the impact of neighborhood safety on blood pressure. We also summarized the mediating and moderating mechanisms through which neighborhood safety influences blood pressure, alongside their direct effects, to offer insights for future research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched 5 electronic databases (PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, and Web of Science) for the period up to and including December 27, 2022. The initial search yielded 4944 studies reviewed, of which 19 met our criteria and were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings consistently show that living in a safe neighborhood is associated with lower blood pressure outcomes. While most cross-sectional studies found that the association was not statistically significant (7/10 studies showed insignificant results), longitudinal studies that tracked changes in neighborhood safety over time (4/5 studies) showed significant negative associations between neighborhood safety and blood pressure. Additionally, some studies identified sex (n=3), age (n=2), and neighborhood characteristics (n=4) as significant moderators, with the strength of the association between neighborhood safety and blood pressure varying across different demographic groups and neighborhood contexts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that unsafe neighborhoods may increase blood pressure and hypertension risk, warranting further research and interventions. This review also highlights the importance of adopting longitudinal designs, especially those using time-varying measures of neighborhood environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"e035381"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.035381","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Responding to the increasing focus on residential environments, our systematic review aimed to consolidate existing empirical evidence regarding the impact of neighborhood safety on blood pressure. We also summarized the mediating and moderating mechanisms through which neighborhood safety influences blood pressure, alongside their direct effects, to offer insights for future research.

Methods: We searched 5 electronic databases (PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, and Web of Science) for the period up to and including December 27, 2022. The initial search yielded 4944 studies reviewed, of which 19 met our criteria and were reviewed.

Results: Our findings consistently show that living in a safe neighborhood is associated with lower blood pressure outcomes. While most cross-sectional studies found that the association was not statistically significant (7/10 studies showed insignificant results), longitudinal studies that tracked changes in neighborhood safety over time (4/5 studies) showed significant negative associations between neighborhood safety and blood pressure. Additionally, some studies identified sex (n=3), age (n=2), and neighborhood characteristics (n=4) as significant moderators, with the strength of the association between neighborhood safety and blood pressure varying across different demographic groups and neighborhood contexts.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that unsafe neighborhoods may increase blood pressure and hypertension risk, warranting further research and interventions. This review also highlights the importance of adopting longitudinal designs, especially those using time-varying measures of neighborhood environments.

邻里安全与高血压风险:一项系统综述。
背景:随着人们对居住环境的关注与日俱增,我们的系统综述旨在整合有关邻里安全对血压影响的现有经验证据。我们还总结了邻里安全影响血压的中介和调节机制,以及它们的直接影响,为今后的研究提供启示:我们检索了 5 个电子数据库(PubMed、Ovid MEDLINE、CINAHL Complete、ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global 和 Web of Science),检索时间截至 2022 年 12 月 27 日(含该日)。初步搜索结果为 4944 项研究,其中 19 项符合我们的标准,并进行了审查:结果:我们的研究结果一致表明,居住在安全的社区与较低的血压结果有关。虽然大多数横断面研究发现这种关联在统计学上并不显著(7/10 项研究显示结果不显著),但跟踪邻里安全随时间变化的纵向研究(4/5 项研究)显示,邻里安全与血压之间存在显著的负相关。此外,一些研究发现性别(3 项)、年龄(2 项)和邻里特征(4 项)是重要的调节因素,邻里安全与血压之间的关联强度因不同的人口群体和邻里环境而异:我们的研究结果表明,不安全的社区可能会增加血压和高血压的风险,因此需要进一步研究和干预。这篇综述还强调了采用纵向设计的重要性,尤其是那些采用时变邻里环境测量方法的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal of the American Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
1749
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice. JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信