Reducing pressurised metered-dose inhaler prescriptions for asthma to reduce carbon emissions: a qualitative study of healthcare professional perspectives.
{"title":"Reducing pressurised metered-dose inhaler prescriptions for asthma to reduce carbon emissions: a qualitative study of healthcare professional perspectives.","authors":"Lauren Franklin, Christian Mallen, Helen Twohig","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prescribing of pressurised metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) is a key NHS carbon hotspot and reducing the number of these devices prescribed will help achieve NHS net zero targets.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore primary healthcare professionals' perspectives on reducing the prescribing of pMDIs for people with asthma to reduce associated carbon emissions.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Qualitative study of healthcare professionals (GPs, practice nurses [PNs], and clinical pharmacists [CPs]) working in general practice in England.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Eighteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals. Participants were recruited through professional networks and using snowball sampling. Topic guides were developed to explore participant perspectives, concerns, and motivations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight GPs, six PNs, and four CPs were interviewed. Results are presented over two topics. The first explores factors influencing inhaler device choice and discusses the following themes: patient-centred care; bias and assumptions; clinician confidence and knowledge; and status quo of asthma care. The second topic identifies facilitators and barriers for prescribing fewer pMDIs through the following themes: understanding; attitudes to change; confidence in dry powder inhalers (DPIs); attitudes to change; engagement with sustainable prescribing; and system drivers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Interlinking personal, consultation, and external factors influence which inhaler device is prescribed for patients with asthma. There are considerable actionable barriers to implementing carbon-conscious prescribing, many of which would improve the quality of asthma care.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Prescribing of pressurised metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) is a key NHS carbon hotspot and reducing the number of these devices prescribed will help achieve NHS net zero targets.
Aim: To explore primary healthcare professionals' perspectives on reducing the prescribing of pMDIs for people with asthma to reduce associated carbon emissions.
Design & setting: Qualitative study of healthcare professionals (GPs, practice nurses [PNs], and clinical pharmacists [CPs]) working in general practice in England.
Method: Eighteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals. Participants were recruited through professional networks and using snowball sampling. Topic guides were developed to explore participant perspectives, concerns, and motivations.
Results: Eight GPs, six PNs, and four CPs were interviewed. Results are presented over two topics. The first explores factors influencing inhaler device choice and discusses the following themes: patient-centred care; bias and assumptions; clinician confidence and knowledge; and status quo of asthma care. The second topic identifies facilitators and barriers for prescribing fewer pMDIs through the following themes: understanding; attitudes to change; confidence in dry powder inhalers (DPIs); attitudes to change; engagement with sustainable prescribing; and system drivers.
Conclusion: Interlinking personal, consultation, and external factors influence which inhaler device is prescribed for patients with asthma. There are considerable actionable barriers to implementing carbon-conscious prescribing, many of which would improve the quality of asthma care.