Reducing pressurised metered dose inhaler prescriptions for asthma to reduce carbon emissions: a qualitative study of healthcare professional perspectives.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-04-02 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0208
Lauren Franklin, Christian Mallen, Helen Twohig
{"title":"Reducing pressurised metered dose inhaler prescriptions for asthma to reduce carbon emissions: a qualitative study of healthcare professional perspectives.","authors":"Lauren Franklin, Christian Mallen, Helen Twohig","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prescribing of pressurised metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) is a key NHS carbon hotspot and reducing the number of these devices prescribed will help achieve NHS net zero targets.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore primary healthcare professionals' perspectives on reducing the prescribing of pMDIs for people with asthma to reduce associated carbon emissions.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Qualitative study of healthcare professionals (general practitioners, practice nurses and clinical pharmacists) working in general practice in England.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Eighteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals. Participants were recruited through professional networks and using snowball sampling. Topic guides were developed to explore participant perspectives, concerns and motivations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight general practitioners, six practice nurses and four clinical pharmacists were interviewed. Results are presented over two topics. The first explores factors influencing inhaler device choice and discusses the themes: patient-centred care, bias and assumptions, clinician confidence and knowledge, and status quo of asthma care. The second topic identifies facilitators and barriers for prescribing fewer pMDIs through the themes: understanding, attitudes to change, confidence in DPIs, engagement with sustainable prescribing, the role of incentives, and guidelines and systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Interlinking personal, consultation and external factors influence which inhaler device is prescribed for patients with asthma. There are significant actionable barriers to implementing carbon-conscious prescribing, many of which would improve the quality of asthma care.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prescribing of pressurised metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) is a key NHS carbon hotspot and reducing the number of these devices prescribed will help achieve NHS net zero targets.

Aim: To explore primary healthcare professionals' perspectives on reducing the prescribing of pMDIs for people with asthma to reduce associated carbon emissions.

Design & setting: Qualitative study of healthcare professionals (general practitioners, practice nurses and clinical pharmacists) working in general practice in England.

Method: Eighteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals. Participants were recruited through professional networks and using snowball sampling. Topic guides were developed to explore participant perspectives, concerns and motivations.

Results: Eight general practitioners, six practice nurses and four clinical pharmacists were interviewed. Results are presented over two topics. The first explores factors influencing inhaler device choice and discusses the themes: patient-centred care, bias and assumptions, clinician confidence and knowledge, and status quo of asthma care. The second topic identifies facilitators and barriers for prescribing fewer pMDIs through the themes: understanding, attitudes to change, confidence in DPIs, engagement with sustainable prescribing, the role of incentives, and guidelines and systems.

Conclusion: Interlinking personal, consultation and external factors influence which inhaler device is prescribed for patients with asthma. There are significant actionable barriers to implementing carbon-conscious prescribing, many of which would improve the quality of asthma care.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信