Augmented reality hip navigation system versus the Naviswiss system in cup alignment during total hip arthroplasty using the posterolateral approach.

IF 2.8 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Koji Katoh, Katsuhiro Lee
{"title":"Augmented reality hip navigation system versus the Naviswiss system in cup alignment during total hip arthroplasty using the posterolateral approach.","authors":"Koji Katoh, Katsuhiro Lee","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.64.BJO-2024-0148.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>No studies have compared two portable navigation systems, including augmented reality (AR) hip navigation and the Naviswiss system, to improve the accuracy of acetabular component alignment during total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the posterolateral approach. We investigated the difference in cup placement accuracy between the two systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively compared THAs performed using the AR hip navigation (n = 32) and those performed using Naviswiss (n = 41) from June 2021 to April 2023. All patients underwent THA in the posterolateral approach. The primary endpoint includes radiological inclination (RI) and radiological anteversion (RA) measured on postoperative radiographs, and the absolute value error of radiological inclination (δRI) and radiological anteversion (δRA) between the final cup alignment displayed on the navigation screen at final cup fixation and cup alignment measured on postoperative radiographs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in the mean RI and mean rRA and δRI and δRA were found between the two groups. The percentage of cases with both δRI and δRA of < 3° were 31% and 24% in the AR hip and Naviswiss groups, respectively, with no significant difference. The percentage of cases in both δRI and δRA of < 5° was 66% and 90% in the AR hip and Naviswiss groups, respectively (p = 0.009). No cases demonstrated both δRI and δRA of > 5°.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant differences were found between the two systems. The Naviswiss system demonstrated a higher percentage of errors within 5° than the AR navigation system, indicating that Naviswiss reproduced functional pelvic plane more accurately.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 4","pages":"391-397"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11964670/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.64.BJO-2024-0148.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: No studies have compared two portable navigation systems, including augmented reality (AR) hip navigation and the Naviswiss system, to improve the accuracy of acetabular component alignment during total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the posterolateral approach. We investigated the difference in cup placement accuracy between the two systems.

Methods: We retrospectively compared THAs performed using the AR hip navigation (n = 32) and those performed using Naviswiss (n = 41) from June 2021 to April 2023. All patients underwent THA in the posterolateral approach. The primary endpoint includes radiological inclination (RI) and radiological anteversion (RA) measured on postoperative radiographs, and the absolute value error of radiological inclination (δRI) and radiological anteversion (δRA) between the final cup alignment displayed on the navigation screen at final cup fixation and cup alignment measured on postoperative radiographs.

Results: No significant differences in the mean RI and mean rRA and δRI and δRA were found between the two groups. The percentage of cases with both δRI and δRA of < 3° were 31% and 24% in the AR hip and Naviswiss groups, respectively, with no significant difference. The percentage of cases in both δRI and δRA of < 5° was 66% and 90% in the AR hip and Naviswiss groups, respectively (p = 0.009). No cases demonstrated both δRI and δRA of > 5°.

Conclusion: No significant differences were found between the two systems. The Naviswiss system demonstrated a higher percentage of errors within 5° than the AR navigation system, indicating that Naviswiss reproduced functional pelvic plane more accurately.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信