Facilitators and Barriers to Uptake of Drug-Drug Interaction Alerts: Perspectives of Australian End Users and Managers.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-02 DOI:10.1055/a-2481-4221
Kristian Stanceski, Bethany A Van Dort, Teresa Lee, Andrew J McLachlan, Richard O Day, Sarah N Hilmer, Ling Li, Johanna Westbrook, Wu Yi Zheng, Michael Barras, Karma Z S Mekhail, Melissa T Baysari
{"title":"Facilitators and Barriers to Uptake of Drug-Drug Interaction Alerts: Perspectives of Australian End Users and Managers.","authors":"Kristian Stanceski, Bethany A Van Dort, Teresa Lee, Andrew J McLachlan, Richard O Day, Sarah N Hilmer, Ling Li, Johanna Westbrook, Wu Yi Zheng, Michael Barras, Karma Z S Mekhail, Melissa T Baysari","doi":"10.1055/a-2481-4221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Drug-drug interaction (DDI) alerts in electronic systems are frequently implemented to minimize the occurrence of preventable DDIs. While prescribers recognize the potential benefits of DDI alerts, a large proportion are overridden by users.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong> This study aimed to explore and compare prescribers' and managers' perspectives of DDI alerts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A qualitative descriptive study was conducted across six hospitals in Australia with end users (prescribers who receive alerts) [<i>n</i> = 14] and managers [<i>n</i> = 20] (senior staff in roles relevant to alert system implementation and management). End users were asked to reflect on alert usefulness, benefits, risks, and impacts. Managers were asked what they thought of alerts, and about any feedback they had received from frontline clinicians. Key themes were extracted via an inductive content analysis approach and deductively mapped to the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM3). Comparisons of the views held toward the alerts were made between the two participant groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> End users predominantly reflected on the utility of the DDI alert system (i.e. how useful it was to their role), less on how easy the system was to use, and mainly focused on the negative consequences of alerts. Managers believed the benefits of DDI alerts are primarily experienced by junior doctors. While end users suggested that alerts should be tailored to the patient's clinical scenario, managers called for DDI alerts to be tailored to the prescriber (seniority and specialty).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Interviews with end users and managers uncovered a number of perceived benefits and limitations of DDI alerts, primarily related to the system's usefulness. While largely consistent, some perceptions were different between end users and managers, particularly in the types of benefits, and how they conceptualized potential tailoring to improve DDI alerts. Our findings point to a need for user participation in the development, deployment, and improvement of alerts to promote consideration and effectiveness of DDI alerts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":"16 2","pages":"295-304"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11964717/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2481-4221","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Drug-drug interaction (DDI) alerts in electronic systems are frequently implemented to minimize the occurrence of preventable DDIs. While prescribers recognize the potential benefits of DDI alerts, a large proportion are overridden by users.

Objectives:  This study aimed to explore and compare prescribers' and managers' perspectives of DDI alerts.

Methods:  A qualitative descriptive study was conducted across six hospitals in Australia with end users (prescribers who receive alerts) [n = 14] and managers [n = 20] (senior staff in roles relevant to alert system implementation and management). End users were asked to reflect on alert usefulness, benefits, risks, and impacts. Managers were asked what they thought of alerts, and about any feedback they had received from frontline clinicians. Key themes were extracted via an inductive content analysis approach and deductively mapped to the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM3). Comparisons of the views held toward the alerts were made between the two participant groups.

Results:  End users predominantly reflected on the utility of the DDI alert system (i.e. how useful it was to their role), less on how easy the system was to use, and mainly focused on the negative consequences of alerts. Managers believed the benefits of DDI alerts are primarily experienced by junior doctors. While end users suggested that alerts should be tailored to the patient's clinical scenario, managers called for DDI alerts to be tailored to the prescriber (seniority and specialty).

Conclusion:  Interviews with end users and managers uncovered a number of perceived benefits and limitations of DDI alerts, primarily related to the system's usefulness. While largely consistent, some perceptions were different between end users and managers, particularly in the types of benefits, and how they conceptualized potential tailoring to improve DDI alerts. Our findings point to a need for user participation in the development, deployment, and improvement of alerts to promote consideration and effectiveness of DDI alerts.

药物-药物相互作用警报的促进因素和障碍:澳大利亚最终用户和管理人员的观点。
背景:在电子系统中经常实施药物-药物相互作用(DDI)警报,以尽量减少可预防的DDI的发生。虽然开处方者认识到DDI警报的潜在好处,但很大一部分被用户忽略了。目的:本研究旨在探讨和比较处方者和管理者对DDI警报的看法。方法:在澳大利亚的六家医院进行定性描述性研究,最终用户(收到警报的处方者)[n = 14]和管理人员[n = 20](与警报系统实施和管理相关的高级工作人员)。最终用户被要求反映警报的有用性、益处、风险和影响。经理们被问及他们对警报的看法,以及他们从一线临床医生那里得到的任何反馈。通过归纳内容分析方法提取关键主题,并演绎映射到技术接受模型(TAM3)。比较了两组参与者对警报的看法。结果:最终用户主要反映了DDI警报系统的效用(即它对他们的角色有多有用),较少反映系统使用的容易程度,并且主要关注警报的负面后果。管理人员认为,DDI警报的好处主要由初级医生体验到。虽然最终用户建议警报应根据患者的临床情况进行调整,但管理人员要求DDI警报应根据处方者(资历和专业)进行调整。结论:对最终用户和管理人员的访谈揭示了DDI警报的许多可感知的好处和局限性,主要与系统的有用性有关。虽然在很大程度上是一致的,但最终用户和管理人员之间的一些看法是不同的,特别是在好处的类型以及他们如何概念化潜在的定制以改进DDI警报方面。我们的研究结果表明,需要用户参与警报的开发、部署和改进,以促进对DDI警报的考虑和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信