Perceptions of contribution of the placebo effects to drug efficacy in community pharmacy practice: A cross-sectional survey.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Joey Fournier, Leo Druart, Marie Allier, Matthieu Roustit
{"title":"Perceptions of contribution of the placebo effects to drug efficacy in community pharmacy practice: A cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Joey Fournier, Leo Druart, Marie Allier, Matthieu Roustit","doi":"10.1016/j.therap.2025.02.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The placebo effect, a well-documented phenomenon in clinical practice, remains complex and multifaceted. While the perception of placebo effects has been assessed among various healthcare professionals, pharmacists - recognized experts in treatment effects and effectiveness - have not been specifically studied. This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the knowledge and perceptions of healthcare professionals working in community pharmacies in France, Switzerland, and Belgium regarding placebo effects.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A self-administered questionnaire was distributed to pharmacists, pharmacy technicians, and community pharmacy students between September and December 2023. The questionnaire used numeric scales (0-10) to evaluate knowledge of placebo effects, underlying mechanisms, influencing factors, and demographic details.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 377 responses were collected, primarily from female pharmacists practicing in France. Respondents demonstrated a strong theoretical understanding of placebo effects (n=302; 80%). Among 12 proposed contextual factors influencing placebo effects, the three most highly rated were patient-related: patient expectations and preferences, past experiences, and beliefs or representations about their condition. Perceptions of placebo effects varied significantly according to medication type, with median scores of 1 [0-3] for treatments with demonstrated efficacy, 3 [1-5] for conventional medicines without demonstrated efficacy, and 6 [4-9] for complementary and alternative medicines (CAM). This suggests that placebo-related efficacy is perceived as more associated with the type of medication (e.g., CAM vs. conventional medicines) rather than the presence or absence of demonstrated efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pharmacists showed a solid theoretical grasp of placebo effects but seem to associate placebo-related efficacy more strongly with medication type than evidence of efficacy. These findings highlight the need to raise awareness among pharmacy-based healthcare professionals about treatment efficacy to improve clinical practice and patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":23147,"journal":{"name":"Therapie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.therap.2025.02.015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The placebo effect, a well-documented phenomenon in clinical practice, remains complex and multifaceted. While the perception of placebo effects has been assessed among various healthcare professionals, pharmacists - recognized experts in treatment effects and effectiveness - have not been specifically studied. This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the knowledge and perceptions of healthcare professionals working in community pharmacies in France, Switzerland, and Belgium regarding placebo effects.

Material and methods: A self-administered questionnaire was distributed to pharmacists, pharmacy technicians, and community pharmacy students between September and December 2023. The questionnaire used numeric scales (0-10) to evaluate knowledge of placebo effects, underlying mechanisms, influencing factors, and demographic details.

Results: A total of 377 responses were collected, primarily from female pharmacists practicing in France. Respondents demonstrated a strong theoretical understanding of placebo effects (n=302; 80%). Among 12 proposed contextual factors influencing placebo effects, the three most highly rated were patient-related: patient expectations and preferences, past experiences, and beliefs or representations about their condition. Perceptions of placebo effects varied significantly according to medication type, with median scores of 1 [0-3] for treatments with demonstrated efficacy, 3 [1-5] for conventional medicines without demonstrated efficacy, and 6 [4-9] for complementary and alternative medicines (CAM). This suggests that placebo-related efficacy is perceived as more associated with the type of medication (e.g., CAM vs. conventional medicines) rather than the presence or absence of demonstrated efficacy.

Conclusion: Pharmacists showed a solid theoretical grasp of placebo effects but seem to associate placebo-related efficacy more strongly with medication type than evidence of efficacy. These findings highlight the need to raise awareness among pharmacy-based healthcare professionals about treatment efficacy to improve clinical practice and patient care.

在社区药房实践中,安慰剂效应对药物疗效的贡献:一项横断面调查。
前言:安慰剂效应是临床实践中一个有充分证据的现象,它仍然是复杂和多方面的。虽然各种医疗保健专业人员对安慰剂效应的看法进行了评估,但药剂师——治疗效果和有效性方面公认的专家——还没有被专门研究过。本横断面研究旨在评估在法国、瑞士和比利时的社区药房工作的卫生保健专业人员关于安慰剂效应的知识和看法。材料与方法:于2023年9 - 12月对药师、药学技术人员和社区药学专业学生进行问卷调查。问卷采用数字量表(0-10)来评估对安慰剂效应、潜在机制、影响因素和人口学细节的了解。结果:共收集了377份回复,主要来自法国执业的女药剂师。受访者对安慰剂效应有很强的理论理解(n=302;80%)。在12个影响安慰剂效应的环境因素中,评价最高的三个是与患者相关的:患者的期望和偏好,过去的经历,以及对自己病情的信念或陈述。对安慰剂效果的认知因药物类型的不同而有显著差异,证明有效的治疗方法的中位数得分为1[0-3],没有证明有效的常规药物的中位数得分为3[1-5],补充和替代药物(CAM)的中位数得分为6[4-9]。这表明,与安慰剂相关的疗效被认为与药物类型(例如,CAM与传统药物)更多地相关,而不是存在或不存在已证实的疗效。结论:药师对安慰剂效应有扎实的理论把握,但似乎安慰剂相关疗效与药物类型的关系比疗效证据的关系更强。这些发现强调需要提高以药物为基础的医疗保健专业人员对治疗效果的认识,以改善临床实践和患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapie
Therapie 医学-药学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
132
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Thérapie is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to Clinical Pharmacology, Therapeutics, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacovigilance, Addictovigilance, Social Pharmacology, Pharmacoepidemiology, Pharmacoeconomics and Evidence-Based-Medicine. Thérapie publishes in French or in English original articles, general reviews, letters to the editor reporting original findings, correspondence relating to articles or letters published in the Journal, short articles, editorials on up-to-date topics, Pharmacovigilance or Addictovigilance reports that follow the French "guidelines" concerning good practice in pharmacovigilance publications. The journal also publishes thematic issues on topical subject. The journal is indexed in the main international data bases and notably in: Biosis Previews/Biological Abstracts, Embase/Excerpta Medica, Medline/Index Medicus, Science Citation Index.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信