A Phase 2a, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Human Challenge Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Molnupiravir in Healthy Participants Inoculated with Respiratory Syncytial Virus.

IF 2.3 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM

Pulmonary Therapy Pub Date : 2025-04-02 DOI:10.1007/s41030-025-00289-z

Mickie H Cheng, Alex J Mann, Brian M Maas, Tian Zhao, Melissa Bevan, Andrea K Schaeffer, Laura E Liao, Andrew P Catchpole, David W Hilbert, S Aubrey Stoch, Carisa S De Anda

{"title":"A Phase 2a, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Human Challenge Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Molnupiravir in Healthy Participants Inoculated with Respiratory Syncytial Virus.","authors":"Mickie H Cheng, Alex J Mann, Brian M Maas, Tian Zhao, Melissa Bevan, Andrea K Schaeffer, Laura E Liao, Andrew P Catchpole, David W Hilbert, S Aubrey Stoch, Carisa S De Anda","doi":"10.1007/s41030-025-00289-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Human respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections can result in hospitalization and/or death among vulnerable populations. Molnupiravir is a prodrug of ß-D-N4-hydroxycytidine, which has broad-spectrum preclinical activity against RNA viruses. We conducted a pilot trial evaluating molnupiravir for RSV infection.Methods: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a human challenge study in healthy adults (≥ 18 to ≤ 55 years old). Eligible participants were randomized 1:1:1 to molnupiravir prophylaxis (5 days, 800 mg twice daily; followed by placebo), molnupiravir treatment (5 days, 800 mg twice daily; started on day 5, unless triggered earlier by positive PCR test; preceded and followed by placebo), or placebo. Study intervention was administered for 11 days, from day -1 (evening), prior to inoculation with RSV on day 0 (morning). For 10 days, quarantined participants reported symptoms thrice daily and underwent nasal wash sample collection twice daily. Primary efficacy endpoints (assessed by quantitative viral culture on plaque assay) were peak viral load (PVL) in all participants (for prophylaxis) and area under the viral-load time curve (VL-AUC) in participants with confirmed infection (for treatment). Adverse events were assessed from day 0 to day 28.Results: Forty participants each were randomized to prophylaxis and placebo and 36 to treatment. Molnupiravir was not statistically significant from placebo in either primary endpoint: with prophylaxis, the difference in mean log10 PVL was - 0.29 plaque-forming units (PFU)/ml (90% CI - 1.16, 0.58; p = 0.578), and with treatment, the difference in mean log10 VL-AUC was - 2.69 day*PFU/ml (90% CI - 6.17, 0.79; p = 0.201). Molnupiravir treatment resulted in significantly faster symptom resolution: 6.0 days versus 8.5 days with placebo (hazard ratio: 2.24 [95% CI: 0.99, 5.07]; p = 0.0459). Adverse event rates were comparable between arms.Conclusions: Although the primary endpoints were not met, modest, non-significant benefits with molnupiravir treatment were seen across virologic endpoints, along with significantly faster symptom resolution.Clinical trail registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT0555005.","PeriodicalId":20919,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41030-025-00289-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Human respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections can result in hospitalization and/or death among vulnerable populations. Molnupiravir is a prodrug of ß-D-N4-hydroxycytidine, which has broad-spectrum preclinical activity against RNA viruses. We conducted a pilot trial evaluating molnupiravir for RSV infection.

Methods: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a human challenge study in healthy adults (≥ 18 to ≤ 55 years old). Eligible participants were randomized 1:1:1 to molnupiravir prophylaxis (5 days, 800 mg twice daily; followed by placebo), molnupiravir treatment (5 days, 800 mg twice daily; started on day 5, unless triggered earlier by positive PCR test; preceded and followed by placebo), or placebo. Study intervention was administered for 11 days, from day -1 (evening), prior to inoculation with RSV on day 0 (morning). For 10 days, quarantined participants reported symptoms thrice daily and underwent nasal wash sample collection twice daily. Primary efficacy endpoints (assessed by quantitative viral culture on plaque assay) were peak viral load (PVL) in all participants (for prophylaxis) and area under the viral-load time curve (VL-AUC) in participants with confirmed infection (for treatment). Adverse events were assessed from day 0 to day 28.

Results: Forty participants each were randomized to prophylaxis and placebo and 36 to treatment. Molnupiravir was not statistically significant from placebo in either primary endpoint: with prophylaxis, the difference in mean log₁₀ PVL was - 0.29 plaque-forming units (PFU)/ml (90% CI - 1.16, 0.58; p = 0.578), and with treatment, the difference in mean log₁₀ VL-AUC was - 2.69 day*PFU/ml (90% CI - 6.17, 0.79; p = 0.201). Molnupiravir treatment resulted in significantly faster symptom resolution: 6.0 days versus 8.5 days with placebo (hazard ratio: 2.24 [95% CI: 0.99, 5.07]; p = 0.0459). Adverse event rates were comparable between arms.

Conclusions: Although the primary endpoints were not met, modest, non-significant benefits with molnupiravir treatment were seen across virologic endpoints, along with significantly faster symptom resolution.

Clinical trail registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT0555005.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Pulmonary Therapy Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

CiteScore

5.20

自引率

3.30%

发文量

审稿时长

6 weeks

期刊介绍： Aims and Scope Pulmonary Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed (single-blind), and rapid publication journal. The scope of the journal is broad and will consider all scientifically sound research from pre-clinical, clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the use of pulmonary therapies, devices, and surgical techniques. Areas of focus include, but are not limited to: asthma; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; pulmonary hypertension; cystic fibrosis; lung cancer; respiratory tract disorders; allergic rhinitis and other respiratory allergies; influenza, pneumococcal infection, respiratory syncytial virus and other respiratory infections; and inhalers and other device therapies. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of pharmaceutical and healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports/series, trial protocols and short communications such as commentaries and editorials. Pulmonary Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of quality research, which may be considered of insufficient interest by other journals. Rapid Publication The journal’s publication timelines aim for a rapid peer review of 2 weeks. If an article is accepted it will be published 3–4 weeks from acceptance. The rapid timelines are achieved through the combination of a dedicated in-house editorial team, who manage article workflow, and an extensive Editorial and Advisory Board who assist with peer review. This allows the journal to support the rapid dissemination of research, whilst still providing robust peer review. Combined with the journal’s open access model this allows for the rapid, efficient communication of the latest research and reviews, fostering the advancement of pulmonary therapies. Open Access All articles published by Pulmonary Therapy are open access. Personal Service The journal’s dedicated in-house editorial team offer a personal “concierge service” meaning authors will always have an editorial contact able to update them on the status of their manuscript. The editorial team check all manuscripts to ensure that articles conform to the most recent COPE, GPP and ICMJE publishing guidelines. This supports the publication of ethically sound and transparent research. Digital Features and Plain Language Summaries Pulmonary Therapy offers a range of additional features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by key summary points, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand the scientific content and overall implications of the article. The journal also provides the option to include various types of digital features including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations. All additional features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. If you consider that your paper would benefit from the inclusion of a digital feature, please let us know. Our editorial team are able to create high-quality slide decks and infographics in-house, and video abstracts through our partner Research Square, and would be happy to assist in any way we can. For further information about digital features, please contact the journal editor (see ‘Contact the Journal’ for email address), and see the ‘Guidelines for digital features and plain language summaries’ document under ‘Submission guidelines’. For examples of digital features please visit our showcase page https://springerhealthcare.com/expertise/publishing-digital-features/ Publication Fees Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be required to pay the mandatory Rapid Service Fee of €4500/ $5100/ £3650. The journal will consider fee discounts and waivers for developing countries and this is decided on a case by case basis. Peer Review Process Upon submission, manuscripts are assessed by the editorial team to ensure they fit within the aims and scope of the journal and are also checked for plagiarism. All suitable submissions are then subject to a comprehensive single-blind peer review. Reviewers are selected based on their relevant expertise and publication history in the subject area. The journal has an extensive pool of editorial and advisory board members who have been selected to assist with peer review based on the afore-mentioned criteria. At least two extensive reviews are required to make the editorial decision, with the exception of some article types such as Commentaries, Editorials, and Letters which are generally reviewed by one member of the Editorial Board. Where reviewer recommendations are conflicted, the editorial board will be contacted for further advice and a presiding decision. Manuscripts are then either accepted, rejected or authors are required to make major or minor revisions (both reviewer comments and editorial comments may need to be addressed). Once a revised manuscript is re-submitted, it is assessed along with the responses to reviewer comments and if it has been adequately revised it will be accepted for publication. Accepted manuscripts are then copyedited and typeset by the production team before online publication. Appeals against decisions following peer review are considered on a case-by-case basis and should be sent to the journal editor. Preprints We encourage posting of preprints of primary research manuscripts on preprint servers, authors’ or institutional websites, and open communications between researchers whether on community preprint servers or preprint commenting platforms. Posting of preprints is not considered prior publication and will not jeopardize consideration in our journals. Authors should disclose details of preprint posting during the submission process or at any other point during consideration in one of our journals. Once the manuscript is published, it is the author’s responsibility to ensure that the preprint record is updated with a publication reference, including the DOI and a URL link to the published version of the article on the journal website. Please follow the link for further information on preprint sharing: https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/journal-author/journal-author-helpdesk/submission/1302#c16721550 Copyright Pulmonary Therapy''s content is published open access under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, which allows users to read, copy, distribute, and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited. The author assigns the exclusive right to any commercial use of the article to Springer. For more information about the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, click here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0. Contact For more information about the journal, including pre-submission enquiries, please contact christopher.vautrinot@springer.com.