AI Risk Prediction Tools for Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Jonlin Chen, Ariel Gabay, Minji Kim, Uchechukwu Amakiri, Lillian A Boe, Carrie Stern, Babak J Mehrara, Chris Gibbons, Jonas A Nelson
{"title":"AI Risk Prediction Tools for Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction.","authors":"Jonlin Chen, Ariel Gabay, Minji Kim, Uchechukwu Amakiri, Lillian A Boe, Carrie Stern, Babak J Mehrara, Chris Gibbons, Jonas A Nelson","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000012124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Accurate risk prediction for patients undergoing breast reconstruction with tissue expanders (TEs) can improve patient counseling and shared decision-making. This study aimed to develop and evaluate traditional statistical and machine learning (ML) approaches to predicting complications in alloplastic breast reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient characteristics, surgical techniques, and complications were collected for all women undergoing immediate TE placement from 2017-2023 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Multivariable logistic regression and ML models were developed to predict TE loss, infection, and seroma. ML model performance was optimized using ten-fold cross validation with hyperparameter tuning. Evaluation metrics included area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and Brier score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 4,046 women undergoing 6,513 immediate TE placements. TE loss occurred in 7.6% of patients (4.8% of TEs), infection in 10% of patients (7.2% of TEs), and seroma in 11.5% of patients (6.2% of TEs). Traditional multivariable regression demonstrated AUCs of 0.63-0.69 and ML models demonstrated AUCs of 0.71-0.73 in predicting TE complications. SHAP analysis highlighted BMI, prepectoral placement, and chemotherapy as key predictors of TE complications. Top-performing models were built into nomograms and a web-based prediction application to provide real-time risk estimates based on patient-specific information.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Accurate risk prediction tools using nomograms and ML models were developed to predict complications in alloplastic breast reconstruction. These findings support incorporating both traditional statistics and machine learning analyses into preoperative assessments of patients undergoing alloplastic breast reconstruction to enhance data-driven, personalized care.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012124","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Accurate risk prediction for patients undergoing breast reconstruction with tissue expanders (TEs) can improve patient counseling and shared decision-making. This study aimed to develop and evaluate traditional statistical and machine learning (ML) approaches to predicting complications in alloplastic breast reconstruction.

Methods: Patient characteristics, surgical techniques, and complications were collected for all women undergoing immediate TE placement from 2017-2023 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Multivariable logistic regression and ML models were developed to predict TE loss, infection, and seroma. ML model performance was optimized using ten-fold cross validation with hyperparameter tuning. Evaluation metrics included area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and Brier score.

Results: This study included 4,046 women undergoing 6,513 immediate TE placements. TE loss occurred in 7.6% of patients (4.8% of TEs), infection in 10% of patients (7.2% of TEs), and seroma in 11.5% of patients (6.2% of TEs). Traditional multivariable regression demonstrated AUCs of 0.63-0.69 and ML models demonstrated AUCs of 0.71-0.73 in predicting TE complications. SHAP analysis highlighted BMI, prepectoral placement, and chemotherapy as key predictors of TE complications. Top-performing models were built into nomograms and a web-based prediction application to provide real-time risk estimates based on patient-specific information.

Conclusion: Accurate risk prediction tools using nomograms and ML models were developed to predict complications in alloplastic breast reconstruction. These findings support incorporating both traditional statistics and machine learning analyses into preoperative assessments of patients undergoing alloplastic breast reconstruction to enhance data-driven, personalized care.

人工智能风险预测工具用于同种异体乳房重建。
导读:对组织扩张器乳房重建患者进行准确的风险预测可以改善患者咨询和共同决策。本研究旨在发展和评估传统的统计学和机器学习(ML)方法来预测同种异体乳房重建的并发症。方法:收集2017-2023年在纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心接受TE即刻安置的所有女性的患者特征、手术技术和并发症。开发了多变量逻辑回归和ML模型来预测TE丢失、感染和血肿。使用超参数调优的十倍交叉验证优化ML模型性能。评估指标包括受试者工作曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性、特异性和Brier评分。结果:该研究包括4,046名接受6,513次即时TE安置的妇女。7.6%的患者(4.8%的TEs)发生TE丢失,10%的患者(7.2%的TEs)发生感染,11.5%的患者(6.2%的TEs)发生血肿。传统多变量回归预测TE并发症auc为0.63-0.69,ML模型auc为0.71-0.73。SHAP分析强调BMI、孕前安置和化疗是TE并发症的关键预测因素。表现最好的模型被内置到图和基于网络的预测应用程序中,以提供基于患者特定信息的实时风险估计。结论:利用x线图和ML模型建立了准确的风险预测工具来预测同种异体乳房重建的并发症。这些发现支持将传统统计和机器学习分析结合到接受同种异体乳房重建的患者的术前评估中,以增强数据驱动的个性化护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信