Evaluation of vascular responses to moderate-intensity continuous and high-intensity interval physical exercise in subjects with elevated blood pressure: a randomised, cross-over clinical trial.

IF 2.8 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Sara Rodrigues, Renata Gomes Sanches Verardino, Valéria Costa-Hong, Camila Paixao Jordao, Marcel Jose Andrade da Costa, Luiz Bortolotto
{"title":"Evaluation of vascular responses to moderate-intensity continuous and high-intensity interval physical exercise in subjects with elevated blood pressure: a randomised, cross-over clinical trial.","authors":"Sara Rodrigues, Renata Gomes Sanches Verardino, Valéria Costa-Hong, Camila Paixao Jordao, Marcel Jose Andrade da Costa, Luiz Bortolotto","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-003121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this randomised two-period crossover trial, the objective was to compare acute changes in arterial distensibility between high-intensity interval physical exercise (HIIPE) and moderate-intensity continuous physical exercise (MICPE) sessions in subjects with elevated blood pressure (BP).</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Participants underwent either MICPE-HIIPE or HIIPE-MICPE sequences with intensity based on cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The main outcome measures included arterial stiffness (by pulse wave velocity (PWV)) at baseline, until 30 min and 24 hours after each physical exercise session. Other measures include office BP, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and applanation tonometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study involved 29 subjects with elevated BP (76% female, 48±7 years, body mass index=28.3±4.3 kg/m², systolic BP=126±9 mm Hg and diastolic BP=84±4 mm Hg). They presented lower PWV 24 hours after MICPE compared with baseline and to 24-hour HIIPE ((-0.83 (-1.29;-0.37) p=0.001) and (-0.98 (-1.84;-0.12), p=0.021), respectively). Despite no differences in office BP, aortic systolic BP was lower after HIIPE compared with baseline and to 24-hour MICPE (113±19; 118±10 and 117±10 mm Hg; p=0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In subjects with elevated BP, arterial distensibility is greater 24 hours after MICPE, while aortic systolic BP is lower after HIIPE. The particularities of each method and each exercise intensity can provide specific mechanisms of vascular response to exercise and detect vascular damage early in these subjects.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04200716.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966945/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-003121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In this randomised two-period crossover trial, the objective was to compare acute changes in arterial distensibility between high-intensity interval physical exercise (HIIPE) and moderate-intensity continuous physical exercise (MICPE) sessions in subjects with elevated blood pressure (BP).

Methods and analysis: Participants underwent either MICPE-HIIPE or HIIPE-MICPE sequences with intensity based on cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The main outcome measures included arterial stiffness (by pulse wave velocity (PWV)) at baseline, until 30 min and 24 hours after each physical exercise session. Other measures include office BP, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and applanation tonometry.

Results: The study involved 29 subjects with elevated BP (76% female, 48±7 years, body mass index=28.3±4.3 kg/m², systolic BP=126±9 mm Hg and diastolic BP=84±4 mm Hg). They presented lower PWV 24 hours after MICPE compared with baseline and to 24-hour HIIPE ((-0.83 (-1.29;-0.37) p=0.001) and (-0.98 (-1.84;-0.12), p=0.021), respectively). Despite no differences in office BP, aortic systolic BP was lower after HIIPE compared with baseline and to 24-hour MICPE (113±19; 118±10 and 117±10 mm Hg; p=0.013).

Conclusion: In subjects with elevated BP, arterial distensibility is greater 24 hours after MICPE, while aortic systolic BP is lower after HIIPE. The particularities of each method and each exercise intensity can provide specific mechanisms of vascular response to exercise and detect vascular damage early in these subjects.

Trial registration number: NCT04200716.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Heart
Open Heart CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信