A Novel Approach for Preventing Biofilm Formation on Various Breast Implant Surfaces: Bacteriophage Therapy.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Oguzhan Karasu, M Suhan Ayhan, Muzaffer Duran, Elif Ayca Sahin, Naim Deniz Ayaz, A Meltem Yalinay
{"title":"A Novel Approach for Preventing Biofilm Formation on Various Breast Implant Surfaces: Bacteriophage Therapy.","authors":"Oguzhan Karasu, M Suhan Ayhan, Muzaffer Duran, Elif Ayca Sahin, Naim Deniz Ayaz, A Meltem Yalinay","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000012132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Capsular contracture is a common complication in breast implant surgery, with subclinical bacterial inflammation being a significant factor. Traditional methods to prevent capsular contracture include antibiotic irrigation and systemic antibiotics. However, the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria has driven the need for alternative treatments. Bacteriophages, capable of lysing bacteria and preventing biofilm formation, are emerging as a potential alternative. This study aims to compare the efficacy of local bacteriophage therapy and local antibiotic treatment in preventing biofilm formation on breast implants.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Fifty-four Wistar Albino rats were divided into three groups: control, antibiotic, and bacteriophage, each with three subgroups for different time points (6 hours, 24 hours, and 30 days). Three types of implant surfaces (smooth, textured, and polyurethane) were incubated with a biofilm-producing strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis before implantation. The implant surfaces in the experimental groups were treated with either antibiotic or bacteriophage solutions before implantation. Samples were collected at 6 hours, 24 hours, and 30 days post-implantation for colony counting and mRNA analysis of the sesI gene.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both bacteriophage and antibiotic treatments significantly reduced colony counts, and mRNA expression compared to the control group at all time points (p<0.05). No significant difference was found between the antibiotic and bacteriophage groups. Textured and polyurethane implants showed lower bacterial loads in the experimental groups compared to smooth implants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights bacteriophages as a promising alternative to antibiotics for preventing biofilm formation on breast implants, representing a pioneering effort in demonstrating their potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012132","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Capsular contracture is a common complication in breast implant surgery, with subclinical bacterial inflammation being a significant factor. Traditional methods to prevent capsular contracture include antibiotic irrigation and systemic antibiotics. However, the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria has driven the need for alternative treatments. Bacteriophages, capable of lysing bacteria and preventing biofilm formation, are emerging as a potential alternative. This study aims to compare the efficacy of local bacteriophage therapy and local antibiotic treatment in preventing biofilm formation on breast implants.

Material and methods: Fifty-four Wistar Albino rats were divided into three groups: control, antibiotic, and bacteriophage, each with three subgroups for different time points (6 hours, 24 hours, and 30 days). Three types of implant surfaces (smooth, textured, and polyurethane) were incubated with a biofilm-producing strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis before implantation. The implant surfaces in the experimental groups were treated with either antibiotic or bacteriophage solutions before implantation. Samples were collected at 6 hours, 24 hours, and 30 days post-implantation for colony counting and mRNA analysis of the sesI gene.

Results: Both bacteriophage and antibiotic treatments significantly reduced colony counts, and mRNA expression compared to the control group at all time points (p<0.05). No significant difference was found between the antibiotic and bacteriophage groups. Textured and polyurethane implants showed lower bacterial loads in the experimental groups compared to smooth implants.

Conclusion: This study highlights bacteriophages as a promising alternative to antibiotics for preventing biofilm formation on breast implants, representing a pioneering effort in demonstrating their potential.

预防各种乳房植入物表面生物膜形成的新方法:噬菌体治疗。
背景:包膜挛缩是乳房植入手术中常见的并发症,其中亚临床细菌性炎症是一个重要因素。预防包膜挛缩的传统方法包括抗生素冲洗和全身抗生素。然而,耐抗生素细菌的增加推动了对替代治疗方法的需求。噬菌体,能够裂解细菌和防止生物膜的形成,正在成为一种潜在的替代品。本研究旨在比较局部噬菌体治疗和局部抗生素治疗在预防隆胸假体生物膜形成方面的效果。材料与方法:将54只Wistar Albino大鼠分为对照组、抗生素组和噬菌体组,每组在不同时间点(6小时、24小时、30天)设3个亚组。三种类型的种植体表面(光滑、纹理和聚氨酯)在种植前与产生生物膜的表皮葡萄球菌菌株孵育。实验组种植体表面在种植前分别用抗生素或噬菌体溶液处理。分别于植入后6小时、24小时和30天采集标本,进行菌落计数和sesI基因mRNA分析。结果:与对照组相比,噬菌体和抗生素治疗在所有时间点都显著降低了菌落计数和mRNA表达(结论:本研究强调噬菌体作为抗生素的有前途的替代品,可以防止乳房植入物上的生物膜形成,代表了展示其潜力的开创性努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信