Oguzhan Karasu, M Suhan Ayhan, Muzaffer Duran, Elif Ayca Sahin, Naim Deniz Ayaz, A Meltem Yalinay
{"title":"A Novel Approach for Preventing Biofilm Formation on Various Breast Implant Surfaces: Bacteriophage Therapy.","authors":"Oguzhan Karasu, M Suhan Ayhan, Muzaffer Duran, Elif Ayca Sahin, Naim Deniz Ayaz, A Meltem Yalinay","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000012132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Capsular contracture is a common complication in breast implant surgery, with subclinical bacterial inflammation being a significant factor. Traditional methods to prevent capsular contracture include antibiotic irrigation and systemic antibiotics. However, the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria has driven the need for alternative treatments. Bacteriophages, capable of lysing bacteria and preventing biofilm formation, are emerging as a potential alternative. This study aims to compare the efficacy of local bacteriophage therapy and local antibiotic treatment in preventing biofilm formation on breast implants.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Fifty-four Wistar Albino rats were divided into three groups: control, antibiotic, and bacteriophage, each with three subgroups for different time points (6 hours, 24 hours, and 30 days). Three types of implant surfaces (smooth, textured, and polyurethane) were incubated with a biofilm-producing strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis before implantation. The implant surfaces in the experimental groups were treated with either antibiotic or bacteriophage solutions before implantation. Samples were collected at 6 hours, 24 hours, and 30 days post-implantation for colony counting and mRNA analysis of the sesI gene.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both bacteriophage and antibiotic treatments significantly reduced colony counts, and mRNA expression compared to the control group at all time points (p<0.05). No significant difference was found between the antibiotic and bacteriophage groups. Textured and polyurethane implants showed lower bacterial loads in the experimental groups compared to smooth implants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights bacteriophages as a promising alternative to antibiotics for preventing biofilm formation on breast implants, representing a pioneering effort in demonstrating their potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012132","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Capsular contracture is a common complication in breast implant surgery, with subclinical bacterial inflammation being a significant factor. Traditional methods to prevent capsular contracture include antibiotic irrigation and systemic antibiotics. However, the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria has driven the need for alternative treatments. Bacteriophages, capable of lysing bacteria and preventing biofilm formation, are emerging as a potential alternative. This study aims to compare the efficacy of local bacteriophage therapy and local antibiotic treatment in preventing biofilm formation on breast implants.
Material and methods: Fifty-four Wistar Albino rats were divided into three groups: control, antibiotic, and bacteriophage, each with three subgroups for different time points (6 hours, 24 hours, and 30 days). Three types of implant surfaces (smooth, textured, and polyurethane) were incubated with a biofilm-producing strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis before implantation. The implant surfaces in the experimental groups were treated with either antibiotic or bacteriophage solutions before implantation. Samples were collected at 6 hours, 24 hours, and 30 days post-implantation for colony counting and mRNA analysis of the sesI gene.
Results: Both bacteriophage and antibiotic treatments significantly reduced colony counts, and mRNA expression compared to the control group at all time points (p<0.05). No significant difference was found between the antibiotic and bacteriophage groups. Textured and polyurethane implants showed lower bacterial loads in the experimental groups compared to smooth implants.
Conclusion: This study highlights bacteriophages as a promising alternative to antibiotics for preventing biofilm formation on breast implants, representing a pioneering effort in demonstrating their potential.
期刊介绍:
For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.