Harrison D Davis, Daniel Mazzaferro, Theodore E Habarth-Morales, Charles A Messa, Ankoor A Talwar, Abhishek A Desai, Phoebe B McAuliffe, Robyn B Broach, Joseph M Serletti, Ivona Percec
{"title":"A Large Prospective Volumetric and Patient-Reported Outcome Analysis Of Hyaluronic Acid Fillers to the Face.","authors":"Harrison D Davis, Daniel Mazzaferro, Theodore E Habarth-Morales, Charles A Messa, Ankoor A Talwar, Abhishek A Desai, Phoebe B McAuliffe, Robyn B Broach, Joseph M Serletti, Ivona Percec","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000012135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hyaluronic acid (HA) facial fillers are a non-surgical treatment for age-related changes. Literature on long-term volumetric results and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is limited. This prospective study aims to precisely define and measure objective tissue metrics and PROs of HA fillers in different facial regions over 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Females aged 40 to 65 received injections in facial regions using HA fillers: Restylane-L® in nasolabial folds and marionette lines, Restylane-L Lyft® in the malars, and Restylane Silk® in the lip border. Patients completed FACE-Q® questionnaires, were photographed with 3D Vectra® M3 Imaging Software pre-injection, immediately post-injection, and at 2-, 4-, and 12-weeks post-injection. Volumes were analyzed from eight regions: left, right malars and extended midface (MEM), upper perioral (UP), lower perioral and jawline (LPJ), and lips. Tissue displacement factor (TDF) and effective volume (EV) were calculated. Statistical analyses included Mann Whitney U tests and risk-adjusted linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>101 women participated. Restylane-L Lyft® had the highest TDF, 1.25, followed by Restylane-L®, 1.14, and Restylane Silk®, 0.56. EV for Restylane-L Lyft® was highest, 89.8%, followed by Restylane-L®, 89.7%, and Restylane Silk®, 70%. Volume maintenance was 65.5% (whole face), 79.2% (MEM), 62.7% (UP), and 37.2% (lips) over 12 weeks. PROs demonstrated improvements in facial appearance, treated regions, psychological and social function.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We define the novel tissue metrics, TDF and EV, relative to HA treatments, with greatest volume maintenance in the midface and greatest loss around the mimetic areas throughout 12 weeks. Significantly improved PROs were observed for patients undergoing large volume HA filler injections.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012135","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Hyaluronic acid (HA) facial fillers are a non-surgical treatment for age-related changes. Literature on long-term volumetric results and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is limited. This prospective study aims to precisely define and measure objective tissue metrics and PROs of HA fillers in different facial regions over 12 weeks.
Methods: Females aged 40 to 65 received injections in facial regions using HA fillers: Restylane-L® in nasolabial folds and marionette lines, Restylane-L Lyft® in the malars, and Restylane Silk® in the lip border. Patients completed FACE-Q® questionnaires, were photographed with 3D Vectra® M3 Imaging Software pre-injection, immediately post-injection, and at 2-, 4-, and 12-weeks post-injection. Volumes were analyzed from eight regions: left, right malars and extended midface (MEM), upper perioral (UP), lower perioral and jawline (LPJ), and lips. Tissue displacement factor (TDF) and effective volume (EV) were calculated. Statistical analyses included Mann Whitney U tests and risk-adjusted linear regression.
Results: 101 women participated. Restylane-L Lyft® had the highest TDF, 1.25, followed by Restylane-L®, 1.14, and Restylane Silk®, 0.56. EV for Restylane-L Lyft® was highest, 89.8%, followed by Restylane-L®, 89.7%, and Restylane Silk®, 70%. Volume maintenance was 65.5% (whole face), 79.2% (MEM), 62.7% (UP), and 37.2% (lips) over 12 weeks. PROs demonstrated improvements in facial appearance, treated regions, psychological and social function.
Conclusions: We define the novel tissue metrics, TDF and EV, relative to HA treatments, with greatest volume maintenance in the midface and greatest loss around the mimetic areas throughout 12 weeks. Significantly improved PROs were observed for patients undergoing large volume HA filler injections.
期刊介绍:
For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.