Zero-exchange workflow for cryoballoon ablation in pulmonary vein isolation using a direct over-the-needle transseptal access with the FlexCath sheath: A multicenter observational study.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Piotr Denysiuk, Marcin Szczasny, Milena Stachyra, Joanna Popiolek-Kalisz, Magdalena Stadnik, Jarosław Wojcik, Piotr Blaszczak, Andrzej Glowniak
{"title":"Zero-exchange workflow for cryoballoon ablation in pulmonary vein isolation using a direct over-the-needle transseptal access with the FlexCath sheath: A multicenter observational study.","authors":"Piotr Denysiuk, Marcin Szczasny, Milena Stachyra, Joanna Popiolek-Kalisz, Magdalena Stadnik, Jarosław Wojcik, Piotr Blaszczak, Andrzej Glowniak","doi":"10.33963/v.phj.105344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transseptal puncture (TSP) is a crucial step during cryoballoon ablation (CBA) allowing for left atrium access. During the procedure an over-the-wire sheath exchange is required, which brings concerns about the exchange-related complications. An alternative option is performing the TSP through a steerable sheath and thus avoiding the exchange.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and safety of a simplified zero-exchange workflow for CBA procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing CBA (with Arctic Front Advance Pro, Medtronic) at 3 centers in Poland were prospectively enrolled and assigned to the standard approach (N=62) or the no-exchange group (N=62). The TSP in the standard approach group was performed through a fixed-curve sheath that was exchanged for a 15F steerable sheath (FlexCath Advance, Medtronic). In the no-exchange group the puncture was performed through the steerable sheath.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TSP was successfully performed in all patients. In the no-exchange group compared to the standard approach group the median (IQR) procedure time and left atrium dwell time were significantly shorter (75.0 (60.0 - 90.0) min vs 80.5 (70.0 - 100.0) min; P = 0.02 and 47 (40.0 - 56.0) min vs 51.5 (43.25 - 64.5) min, P = 0.04 , respectively) with comparable median (IQR) fluoroscopy time (14.0 (8.5 - 20.4) min vs 12.25 (10.0 - 17.6) min, P = 0.74). Only one potentially TSP-related complication has occurred in each group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A direct TSP with the FlexCath Advance sheath is a feasible, safe and efficient alternative to the standard approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":17784,"journal":{"name":"Kardiologia polska","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kardiologia polska","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33963/v.phj.105344","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transseptal puncture (TSP) is a crucial step during cryoballoon ablation (CBA) allowing for left atrium access. During the procedure an over-the-wire sheath exchange is required, which brings concerns about the exchange-related complications. An alternative option is performing the TSP through a steerable sheath and thus avoiding the exchange.

Aims: We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and safety of a simplified zero-exchange workflow for CBA procedure.

Methods: Patients undergoing CBA (with Arctic Front Advance Pro, Medtronic) at 3 centers in Poland were prospectively enrolled and assigned to the standard approach (N=62) or the no-exchange group (N=62). The TSP in the standard approach group was performed through a fixed-curve sheath that was exchanged for a 15F steerable sheath (FlexCath Advance, Medtronic). In the no-exchange group the puncture was performed through the steerable sheath.

Results: TSP was successfully performed in all patients. In the no-exchange group compared to the standard approach group the median (IQR) procedure time and left atrium dwell time were significantly shorter (75.0 (60.0 - 90.0) min vs 80.5 (70.0 - 100.0) min; P = 0.02 and 47 (40.0 - 56.0) min vs 51.5 (43.25 - 64.5) min, P = 0.04 , respectively) with comparable median (IQR) fluoroscopy time (14.0 (8.5 - 20.4) min vs 12.25 (10.0 - 17.6) min, P = 0.74). Only one potentially TSP-related complication has occurred in each group.

Conclusion: A direct TSP with the FlexCath Advance sheath is a feasible, safe and efficient alternative to the standard approach.

背景:经房间穿刺(TSP)是冷冻球囊消融术(CBA)中进入左心房的关键步骤。在手术过程中,需要进行线外鞘管交换,这带来了交换相关并发症的担忧。目的:我们旨在评估 CBA 手术零交换简化工作流程的可行性、有效性和安全性:在波兰的 3 个中心接受 CBA(使用 Arctic Front Advance Pro,美敦力公司)手术的患者均为前瞻性入组,并被分配到标准方法组(62 人)或无交换组(62 人)。标准方法组的 TSP 是通过固定曲线鞘进行的,该鞘被换成了 15F 可转向鞘(FlexCath Advance,美敦力公司)。结果:结果:所有患者都成功进行了 TSP 穿刺。与标准方法组相比,无交换组的中位(IQR)手术时间和左心房停留时间明显缩短(75.0(60.0 - 90.0)分钟 vs 80.5(70.0 - 100.0)分钟;P = 0.02;47(40.0 - 56.0)分钟 vs 51.5(43.25 - 64.5)分钟,P = 0.04),透视时间中位数(IQR)相当(14.0(8.5 - 20.4)分钟 vs 12.25(10.0 - 17.6)分钟,P = 0.74)。两组患者均只发生了一起可能与 TSP 相关的并发症:结论:使用 FlexCath Advance 鞘直接进行 TSP 是一种可行、安全且高效的标准方法替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kardiologia polska
Kardiologia polska 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
24.20%
发文量
431
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Kardiologia Polska (Kardiol Pol, Polish Heart Journal) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Polish Cardiac Society (PTK, Polskie Towarzystwo Kardiologiczne) published monthly since 1957. It aims to provide a platform for sharing knowledge in cardiology, from basic science to translational and clinical research on cardiovascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信