Resident Physician Intentions Regarding Unionization.

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Laura K Barger, Matthew D Weaver, Christopher P Landrigan, Jason P Sullivan, Rebecca Robbins, Ariel S Winn, Charles A Czeisler
{"title":"Resident Physician Intentions Regarding Unionization.","authors":"Laura K Barger, Matthew D Weaver, Christopher P Landrigan, Jason P Sullivan, Rebecca Robbins, Ariel S Winn, Charles A Czeisler","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.3106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Resident physicians provide frontline care to approximately 70% of hospitalized patients. After decades of relative stability with a small minority of resident physicians unionized, unionization movements have succeeded in recent years at multiple major academic medical centers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate resident physicians' unionization intention and the factors informing their unionization consideration at their institution.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This nationwide survey study was conducted in May 2023 among a cohort of resident physicians, which was established over the course of 3 academic years (2020-2023). Resident physicians were invited to participate in an end-of-study survey on contemporary topics, which included questions on unionization.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Consideration of unionization by resident physicians.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The main outcomes were the presence of a union at the institution for physicians in training, the presence of a movement to unionize, whether the resident physician would vote to unionize, and the factors most important in considering unionization. All measures were self-reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1235 participants (mean [SD] age, 28.8 [3.6] years; 737 of 1224 females [60%]; 791 of 1086 (73%) in their first postgraduate year) responded to survey questions regarding unionization. Twenty percent of participants (n = 249) reported that physicians in training belonged to a union at their institution. Among the 986 nonunionized resident physicians, 63% (625) reported they would vote to unionize, whereas less than 10% (96) would not vote to unionize. Pay and work hours were the most commonly cited factors in considering unionization (88% [1081 of 1235 participants] and 76% [941 of 1235 participants], respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this survey study, most resident physicians (>70%) reported either being in a union or supporting unionization at their institution, citing pay and financial security as critical factors in their consideration of unionization. Future research should investigate other factors and whether unionization achieves its goals of increased pay and benefits, work hours, and well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 4","pages":"e253106"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11969282/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.3106","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Resident physicians provide frontline care to approximately 70% of hospitalized patients. After decades of relative stability with a small minority of resident physicians unionized, unionization movements have succeeded in recent years at multiple major academic medical centers.

Objective: To evaluate resident physicians' unionization intention and the factors informing their unionization consideration at their institution.

Design, setting, and participants: This nationwide survey study was conducted in May 2023 among a cohort of resident physicians, which was established over the course of 3 academic years (2020-2023). Resident physicians were invited to participate in an end-of-study survey on contemporary topics, which included questions on unionization.

Exposure: Consideration of unionization by resident physicians.

Main outcomes and measures: The main outcomes were the presence of a union at the institution for physicians in training, the presence of a movement to unionize, whether the resident physician would vote to unionize, and the factors most important in considering unionization. All measures were self-reported.

Results: A total of 1235 participants (mean [SD] age, 28.8 [3.6] years; 737 of 1224 females [60%]; 791 of 1086 (73%) in their first postgraduate year) responded to survey questions regarding unionization. Twenty percent of participants (n = 249) reported that physicians in training belonged to a union at their institution. Among the 986 nonunionized resident physicians, 63% (625) reported they would vote to unionize, whereas less than 10% (96) would not vote to unionize. Pay and work hours were the most commonly cited factors in considering unionization (88% [1081 of 1235 participants] and 76% [941 of 1235 participants], respectively).

Conclusions and relevance: In this survey study, most resident physicians (>70%) reported either being in a union or supporting unionization at their institution, citing pay and financial security as critical factors in their consideration of unionization. Future research should investigate other factors and whether unionization achieves its goals of increased pay and benefits, work hours, and well-being.

住院医师关于工会化的意向。
重要性:住院医师为大约70%的住院患者提供一线护理。经过几十年的相对稳定,只有少数住院医生加入了工会,近年来,工会化运动在多个主要的学术医疗中心取得了成功。目的:了解住院医师组织工会的意向及影响其组织工会的因素。设计、环境和参与者:这项全国性的调查研究于2023年5月在住院医师队列中进行,该队列建立了3个学年(2020-2023)。住院医师被邀请参加一项关于当代主题的研究结束调查,其中包括关于工会化的问题。暴露:住院医师工会化的考虑。主要结果和措施:主要结果是培训医师机构是否存在工会,是否存在工会运动,住院医师是否会投票加入工会,以及考虑加入工会的最重要因素。所有测量均为自我报告。结果:共有1235名参与者(平均[SD]年龄28.8[3.6]岁;1224只雌性中有737只(60%);1086名学生中有791名(73%)回答了有关工会化的调查问题。20%的参与者(n = 249)报告说,正在接受培训的医生属于他们所在机构的工会。在未加入工会的986名住院医师中,63%(625名)表示将投票加入工会,而不到10%(96名)表示不会投票加入工会。工资和工作时间是考虑工会化的最常见因素(分别为88%[1235名参与者中的1081人]和76%[1235名参与者中的941人])。结论和相关性:在这项调查研究中,大多数住院医师(约70%)报告说,他们要么在工会中,要么支持他们所在机构的工会组织,并将薪酬和经济保障作为他们考虑加入工会的关键因素。未来的研究应该调查其他因素,以及工会是否达到了增加工资和福利、工作时间和福祉的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信