US FDA-accelerated approvals and subsequent withdrawals: influence on Japanese clinical oncology practice guidelines.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Hayase Hakariya, Akihiko Ozaki, Tetsuya Tanimoto
{"title":"US FDA-accelerated approvals and subsequent withdrawals: influence on Japanese clinical oncology practice guidelines.","authors":"Hayase Hakariya, Akihiko Ozaki, Tetsuya Tanimoto","doi":"10.1007/s10637-025-01524-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The US (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-accelerated approval pathway facilitates early access to oncology drugs based on surrogate endpoints, with required confirmatory post-marketing trials. However, regulatory decisions vary globally, with some drugs withdrawn in the US remaining approved in Japan. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of Japanese professional society guidelines, evaluating recommendations for seven accelerated approval cancer drugs withdrawn from the US market but retained in Japan. We assessed for level of evidence and level of treatment preference ratings with consensus across guidelines issued by the corresponding Japanese professional societies. Four of the seven drugs (57%) were recommended as highly or moderately preferred treatment options in Japanese guidelines: gemtuzumab ozogamicin for acute myeloid leukemia, gefitinib for EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer, bevacizumab for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, and atezolizumab with nab-paclitaxel for PD-L1-positive triple-negative breast cancer. Detailed analysis of regulatory history and background of guideline recommendation revealed discrepancies in the assessment of clinical benefits: gemtuzumab ozogamicin failed to demonstrate benefits amid safety concerns, while gefitinib, bevacizumab, and atezolizumab were more controversial, although they did not demonstrate improved overall survival in post-marketing trials. Despite regulatory withdrawal in the US due to unproven clinical benefits, drugs retained in Japan received positive guideline recommendations. This finding highlights regional variations in regulatory decisions and different approaches to benefit-risk assessments, suggesting a need for improved transparency in Japan's regulatory decisions and guideline recommendations, with clearer justifications for endorsing drugs that are considered to have unproven clinical benefits in the US.</p>","PeriodicalId":14513,"journal":{"name":"Investigational New Drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigational New Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-025-01524-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The US (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-accelerated approval pathway facilitates early access to oncology drugs based on surrogate endpoints, with required confirmatory post-marketing trials. However, regulatory decisions vary globally, with some drugs withdrawn in the US remaining approved in Japan. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of Japanese professional society guidelines, evaluating recommendations for seven accelerated approval cancer drugs withdrawn from the US market but retained in Japan. We assessed for level of evidence and level of treatment preference ratings with consensus across guidelines issued by the corresponding Japanese professional societies. Four of the seven drugs (57%) were recommended as highly or moderately preferred treatment options in Japanese guidelines: gemtuzumab ozogamicin for acute myeloid leukemia, gefitinib for EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer, bevacizumab for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, and atezolizumab with nab-paclitaxel for PD-L1-positive triple-negative breast cancer. Detailed analysis of regulatory history and background of guideline recommendation revealed discrepancies in the assessment of clinical benefits: gemtuzumab ozogamicin failed to demonstrate benefits amid safety concerns, while gefitinib, bevacizumab, and atezolizumab were more controversial, although they did not demonstrate improved overall survival in post-marketing trials. Despite regulatory withdrawal in the US due to unproven clinical benefits, drugs retained in Japan received positive guideline recommendations. This finding highlights regional variations in regulatory decisions and different approaches to benefit-risk assessments, suggesting a need for improved transparency in Japan's regulatory decisions and guideline recommendations, with clearer justifications for endorsing drugs that are considered to have unproven clinical benefits in the US.

美国fda加速批准和随后的撤销:对日本临床肿瘤学实践指南的影响
美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)的加速审批途径促进了基于替代终点的肿瘤药物的早期获得,并要求进行确证性上市后试验。然而,各国的监管决定各不相同,一些在美国被撤销的药物在日本仍获得批准。我们对日本专业协会指南进行了横断面分析,评估了从美国市场撤回但在日本保留的7种加速批准的癌症药物的建议。我们评估了证据水平和治疗偏好评级水平,并在日本相应专业协会发布的指南中达成共识。在日本指南中,7种药物中有4种(57%)被推荐为高度或中度首选治疗方案:吉妥珠单抗用于急性髓性白血病,吉非替尼用于egfr阳性非小细胞肺癌,贝伐单抗用于her2阴性转移性乳腺癌,阿特唑单抗与白蛋白紫杉醇联合用于pd - 1阳性三阴性乳腺癌。对指南推荐的监管历史和背景的详细分析揭示了临床获益评估的差异:出于安全考虑,吉妥珠单抗ozogamicin未能显示出获益,而吉非替尼、贝伐单抗和阿特唑单抗更具争议,尽管它们在上市后试验中没有显示出改善的总生存期。尽管由于未经证实的临床益处在美国被监管机构撤回,但保留在日本的药物获得了积极的指南建议。这一发现突出了监管决策的地区差异和不同的利益风险评估方法,表明日本需要提高监管决策和指南建议的透明度,对在美国被认为具有未经证实的临床益处的药物给予更明确的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The development of new anticancer agents is one of the most rapidly changing aspects of cancer research. Investigational New Drugs provides a forum for the rapid dissemination of information on new anticancer agents. The papers published are of interest to the medical chemist, toxicologist, pharmacist, pharmacologist, biostatistician and clinical oncologist. Investigational New Drugs provides the fastest possible publication of new discoveries and results for the whole community of scientists developing anticancer agents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信