Towards institutionalizing HTA in Ethiopia: using a political economy analysis to explore stakeholder perspectives and assessing capacity needs.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Daniel Asfaw Erku, Ararso Desalegn, Tesfaye Mesele Mekonnen, Ermias Dessie, Firmaye Bogale Wolde, Sabit Ababor Ababulgu, Paul A Scuffham, Damian Walker, Rabia Sucu, Samuel Abera
{"title":"Towards institutionalizing HTA in Ethiopia: using a political economy analysis to explore stakeholder perspectives and assessing capacity needs.","authors":"Daniel Asfaw Erku, Ararso Desalegn, Tesfaye Mesele Mekonnen, Ermias Dessie, Firmaye Bogale Wolde, Sabit Ababor Ababulgu, Paul A Scuffham, Damian Walker, Rabia Sucu, Samuel Abera","doi":"10.1017/S0266462325000170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As Ethiopia advances towards efficient resource utilization and UHC through strategic health purchasing, the institutionalization of HTA will play a critical role. This study aims to identify key stakeholders, analyze the political economy surrounding HTA and priority setting in Ethiopia, and assess existing skills and capacities for a robust and sustainable HTA system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed a mixed-method approach, combining 16 key informant interviews, 24 document reviews, and a cross-sectional survey (n=65) to assess national HTA capacity. We employed the Walt and Gilson policy analysis triangle framework, alongside Campos and Reich's framework, to evaluate the context, process, content, and actors influencing HTA institutionalization, and to explore the complex interplay of institutions, positions, power, and interests among various stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While there is a general commitment to implementing HTA across various government agencies and stakeholder groups, the institutionalization process faces several challenges, involving multiple agencies with overlapping mandates, raises bureaucratic challenges and potential conflicts, risking horizontal fragmentation as agencies compete for authority, budget, and influence. The involvement of other key stakeholders, such as professional associations, patients, and the public, is notably lacking. Challenges such as limited HTA expertise, high professional turnover, and gaps in specific HTA knowledge areas persist, with capacity-building efforts often failing to address organizational needs effectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The complexity of HTA institutionalization in Ethiopia underscores the necessity of managing intricate inter-agency dynamics, establishing a robust legal framework for an inclusive and transparent HTA process, building local capacity, and securing sustainable, domestically aligned funding.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"e24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12019762/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462325000170","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As Ethiopia advances towards efficient resource utilization and UHC through strategic health purchasing, the institutionalization of HTA will play a critical role. This study aims to identify key stakeholders, analyze the political economy surrounding HTA and priority setting in Ethiopia, and assess existing skills and capacities for a robust and sustainable HTA system.

Methods: We employed a mixed-method approach, combining 16 key informant interviews, 24 document reviews, and a cross-sectional survey (n=65) to assess national HTA capacity. We employed the Walt and Gilson policy analysis triangle framework, alongside Campos and Reich's framework, to evaluate the context, process, content, and actors influencing HTA institutionalization, and to explore the complex interplay of institutions, positions, power, and interests among various stakeholders.

Results: While there is a general commitment to implementing HTA across various government agencies and stakeholder groups, the institutionalization process faces several challenges, involving multiple agencies with overlapping mandates, raises bureaucratic challenges and potential conflicts, risking horizontal fragmentation as agencies compete for authority, budget, and influence. The involvement of other key stakeholders, such as professional associations, patients, and the public, is notably lacking. Challenges such as limited HTA expertise, high professional turnover, and gaps in specific HTA knowledge areas persist, with capacity-building efforts often failing to address organizational needs effectively.

Conclusions: The complexity of HTA institutionalization in Ethiopia underscores the necessity of managing intricate inter-agency dynamics, establishing a robust legal framework for an inclusive and transparent HTA process, building local capacity, and securing sustainable, domestically aligned funding.

在埃塞俄比亚实现HTA制度化:使用政治经济学分析来探索利益相关者的观点和评估能力需求。
背景:随着埃塞俄比亚通过战略性卫生采购向有效的资源利用和全民健康覆盖迈进,卫生保健服务的制度化将发挥关键作用。本研究旨在确定关键利益相关者,分析围绕埃塞俄比亚HTA和优先事项设置的政治经济学,并评估现有技能和能力,以建立一个强大和可持续的HTA系统。方法:我们采用混合方法,结合16个关键信息提供者访谈,24个文献回顾和一个横断面调查(n=65)来评估国家HTA的能力。我们采用Walt和Gilson的三角政策分析框架,以及Campos和Reich的框架,来评估影响HTA制度化的背景、过程、内容和行动者,并探索不同利益相关者之间制度、立场、权力和利益的复杂相互作用。结果:虽然在各个政府机构和利益相关者群体中普遍承诺实施HTA,但制度化过程面临若干挑战,涉及多个职能重叠的机构,引发了官僚主义挑战和潜在冲突,并有可能在各机构争夺权力、预算和影响力时出现横向分裂。其他关键利益攸关方,如专业协会、患者和公众的参与明显缺乏。HTA专业知识有限、专业人员流动率高、特定HTA知识领域存在差距等挑战依然存在,能力建设工作往往无法有效满足组织需求。结论:埃塞俄比亚HTA制度化的复杂性强调了管理复杂的机构间动态、为包容和透明的HTA进程建立健全的法律框架、建设地方能力以及确保可持续的、与国内一致的资金的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信