Gynecologic Cancer Screening: Understanding Barriers Through Social Cognitive Theory and Health Belief Model.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Shaheen Mansori, Akalpita Tendulkar, Mehran Rostamzadeh
{"title":"Gynecologic Cancer Screening: Understanding Barriers Through Social Cognitive Theory and Health Belief Model.","authors":"Shaheen Mansori, Akalpita Tendulkar, Mehran Rostamzadeh","doi":"10.1177/10901981251328590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite advancements in screening technologies, gynecologic cancers remain among the deadliest and most overlooked cancers. Early detection is crucial, but many women are reluctant to undergo screening due to various barriers and misconceptions. This study explores the motivations and barriers influencing women's decisions regarding early gynecologic cancer screening in Malaysia. In-depth interviews were conducted with 20 professional women from diverse backgrounds using a qualitative approach. Data were analyzed through open and axial coding to identify key themes. An empathy map and user journey map captured the psychological and behavioral aspects of decision-making. The study identified themes such as lack of knowledge, reliance on social media and health care professionals, financial and time constraints, fear of results, and cultural stigmas. Participants with higher awareness were more likely to undergo screening, while those with personal or family cancer experiences showed greater vigilance. The findings emphasize the importance of culturally sensitive communication and health care professionals' role in reducing stigma and promoting early screening. The study's insights contribute to developing strategies to encourage early detection and improve health outcomes for women. These strategies align with the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being) and SDG 5 (Gender Equality), promoting health equity and empowering women. As emphasized by SDG 17 (Partnerships for the Goals), achieving these goals requires strong partnerships and collaborative efforts to create a supportive environment for early cancer screening initiatives. Policymakers can use these insights to foster health equity and empower women through supportive screening environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":12974,"journal":{"name":"Health Education & Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"10901981251328590"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981251328590","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite advancements in screening technologies, gynecologic cancers remain among the deadliest and most overlooked cancers. Early detection is crucial, but many women are reluctant to undergo screening due to various barriers and misconceptions. This study explores the motivations and barriers influencing women's decisions regarding early gynecologic cancer screening in Malaysia. In-depth interviews were conducted with 20 professional women from diverse backgrounds using a qualitative approach. Data were analyzed through open and axial coding to identify key themes. An empathy map and user journey map captured the psychological and behavioral aspects of decision-making. The study identified themes such as lack of knowledge, reliance on social media and health care professionals, financial and time constraints, fear of results, and cultural stigmas. Participants with higher awareness were more likely to undergo screening, while those with personal or family cancer experiences showed greater vigilance. The findings emphasize the importance of culturally sensitive communication and health care professionals' role in reducing stigma and promoting early screening. The study's insights contribute to developing strategies to encourage early detection and improve health outcomes for women. These strategies align with the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being) and SDG 5 (Gender Equality), promoting health equity and empowering women. As emphasized by SDG 17 (Partnerships for the Goals), achieving these goals requires strong partnerships and collaborative efforts to create a supportive environment for early cancer screening initiatives. Policymakers can use these insights to foster health equity and empower women through supportive screening environments.

妇科癌症筛查:通过社会认知理论和健康信念模型理解障碍。
尽管筛查技术取得了进步,妇科癌症仍然是最致命和最容易被忽视的癌症之一。早期检测至关重要,但由于各种障碍和误解,许多妇女不愿接受筛查。本研究探讨的动机和障碍,影响妇女决定早期妇科癌症筛查在马来西亚。采用定性方法对来自不同背景的20名职业女性进行了深入访谈。通过开放式和轴向编码分析数据以确定关键主题。同理心地图和用户旅程地图捕捉了决策的心理和行为方面。该研究确定了诸如缺乏知识、依赖社交媒体和医疗保健专业人员、经济和时间限制、对结果的恐惧以及文化耻辱等主题。意识较高的参与者更有可能接受筛查,而个人或家庭有癌症经历的参与者则表现出更高的警惕性。研究结果强调了文化敏感的沟通和卫生保健专业人员在减少耻辱和促进早期筛查方面的作用的重要性。这项研究的见解有助于制定鼓励早期发现和改善妇女健康结果的战略。这些战略符合联合国可持续发展目标(SDG),特别是可持续发展目标3(良好健康和福祉)和可持续发展目标5(性别平等),旨在促进卫生公平和增强妇女权能。正如可持续发展目标17(目标伙伴关系)所强调的那样,实现这些目标需要强有力的伙伴关系和协作努力,为早期癌症筛查行动创造一个支持性环境。决策者可以利用这些见解促进卫生公平,并通过支持性筛查环境赋予妇女权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Education & Behavior
Health Education & Behavior PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Health Education & Behavior is the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education (SOPHE). The journal publishes authoritative and practical information on critical health issues for a broad range of professionals interested in understanding factors associated with health behavior and health status, and strategies to improve social and behavioral health. The journal is interested in articles directed toward researchers and/or practitioners in health behavior and health education. Empirical research, case study, program evaluation, literature reviews, and articles discussing theories are regularly published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信