Adverse event signal analysis of type Ib MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors based on food and drug administration adverse event reporting system.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Junyu Wang, Rong Ma, Binbin Qu, Xiangpeng Li
{"title":"Adverse event signal analysis of type Ib MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors based on food and drug administration adverse event reporting system.","authors":"Junyu Wang, Rong Ma, Binbin Qu, Xiangpeng Li","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2487158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Type Ib MET Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs), such as capmatinib, tepotinib, and savolitinib, are used to treat MET-amplified and MET exon 14 deletion mutant non-small cell lung cancer. This pharmacovigilance study analyzed data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) between September 2014 and March 2024 to assess adverse events (AEs) for these FDA-approved drugs.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search of AEs using MedDRA SMQs by SOC and PT, and performed disproportionality analysis to identify safety signals, calculating ROR, PRR, EBGM, and IC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis identified significant safety signals: capmatinib showed signals for ear and labyrinth disorders, neoplasms, general disorders, and hepatobiliary disorders; tepotinib for renal and urinary disorders, ear and labyrinth disorders, metabolism and nutrition disorders, and general disorders; savolitinib for hepatobiliary disorders. Key PT signals included protein deficiency, scrotal edema, and chylothorax for capmatinib; edema and decreased blood albumin for tepotinib; and abnormal hepatic function for savolitinib.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights differences in the safety profiles of Type Ib MET TKIs, underscoring the need for further regulatory review and possible updates to product labels to better inform clinicians and patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2487158","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Type Ib MET Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs), such as capmatinib, tepotinib, and savolitinib, are used to treat MET-amplified and MET exon 14 deletion mutant non-small cell lung cancer. This pharmacovigilance study analyzed data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) between September 2014 and March 2024 to assess adverse events (AEs) for these FDA-approved drugs.

Research design and methods: We conducted a systematic search of AEs using MedDRA SMQs by SOC and PT, and performed disproportionality analysis to identify safety signals, calculating ROR, PRR, EBGM, and IC.

Results: The analysis identified significant safety signals: capmatinib showed signals for ear and labyrinth disorders, neoplasms, general disorders, and hepatobiliary disorders; tepotinib for renal and urinary disorders, ear and labyrinth disorders, metabolism and nutrition disorders, and general disorders; savolitinib for hepatobiliary disorders. Key PT signals included protein deficiency, scrotal edema, and chylothorax for capmatinib; edema and decreased blood albumin for tepotinib; and abnormal hepatic function for savolitinib.

Conclusion: The study highlights differences in the safety profiles of Type Ib MET TKIs, underscoring the need for further regulatory review and possible updates to product labels to better inform clinicians and patients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信