Voluntary-assisted dying, euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: global perspectives-systematic review.

Abstract

Background: Discussions about euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (EAS) involve various stakeholders, including patients, healthcare professionals and the general public. This review examines perspectives across different population subgroups to contribute to a broader understanding of EAS attitudes.

Methods: A systematic review of literature published prior to July 2023 with quantitative data about EAS views was undertaken. Details extracted from eligible papers included data year, geography, demographic features of population subgroups and levels of support for EAS under various circumstances. Proportions in support for EAS were calculated based on these factors. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate changes in the proportion of support for euthanasia dependent on the presence or absence of pain or terminal illness in patients.

Results: The search identified 521 relevant studies. There were 1863 relevant survey questions with 1 945 945 individual responses, spanning years 1936 to 2023.478 studies explored whether EAS should be allowed, 134 examined clinician willingness to practise EAS and 78 investigated which persons might seek EAS. Clinician views were surveyed in 266 studies, public opinion in 139 and patient beliefs in 54.Support for EAS across studies and subpopulations varied widely. Mean support for EAS was lower in doctors than in the general public (25% compared with 55%). Support varied depending on access criteria to EAS with 54% support for patients in pain vs 36% for those without and 53% for terminally ill patients vs 29% for those without a terminal illness. Public support for EAS was lower in religious people, females, older people and African Americans.

Conclusions: Support for EAS varies widely across studies, with numerous demographic and situational factors associated with differing levels of support. This indicates a complex interplay of elements is involved in the formation of EAS beliefs. Understanding these factors is valuable for facilitating meaningful discussions among clinicians and the community and informing policy debates and decisions.