Evaluating the dosimetric and positioning accuracy of a deep learning based synthetic-CT generation model for liver radiotherapy.

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Lamyaa Aljaafari, Richard Speight, David L Buckley, Bashar Al-Qaisieh, Sebastian Andersson, David Bird
{"title":"Evaluating the dosimetric and positioning accuracy of a deep learning based synthetic-CT generation model for liver radiotherapy.","authors":"Lamyaa Aljaafari, Richard Speight, David L Buckley, Bashar Al-Qaisieh, Sebastian Andersson, David Bird","doi":"10.1088/2057-1976/adc818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>&#xD;An MRI-only workflow requires synthetic computed tomography (sCT) images to enable dose calculation. This study evaluated the dosimetric and patient positioning accuracy of deep learning-generated sCT for liver radiotherapy.&#xD;Methods and materials:&#xD;sCT images were generated for eleven patients using a CycleGAN algorithm. Clinical volumetric modulated arc treatment plans (VMAT) were calculated on CT and recalculated on sCT, and dose differences were assessed using dose volume histogram (DVH). For position verification, the sCT images were validated as reference images to 4D cone beam computed tomography (4D CBCT) by calculating the translational and rotational differences between sCT and CT registrations to 4D CBCT.&#xD;Results:&#xD;The mean dose differences for the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR) between the CT and sCT plans were 0.0% and < 0.5% respectively. For positioning verification, the systematic translational and rotational differences were < 0.5 mm and < 0.5° respectively in all directions&#xD;Conclusion:&#xD;This is the first study to validate a sCT model for liver cancer in terms of both dosimetry and patient positioning, marking a significant step in demonstrating the feasibility of an MRI-only workflow for treating liver cancer. The generated sCT showed dosimetric differences within clinically acceptable levels and were successfully used as reference images for treatment position verification. This CycleGAN model is accessible through the research version of a commercial vendor, with potential for development as a clinical solution.&#xD.</p>","PeriodicalId":8896,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/adc818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: An MRI-only workflow requires synthetic computed tomography (sCT) images to enable dose calculation. This study evaluated the dosimetric and patient positioning accuracy of deep learning-generated sCT for liver radiotherapy. Methods and materials: sCT images were generated for eleven patients using a CycleGAN algorithm. Clinical volumetric modulated arc treatment plans (VMAT) were calculated on CT and recalculated on sCT, and dose differences were assessed using dose volume histogram (DVH). For position verification, the sCT images were validated as reference images to 4D cone beam computed tomography (4D CBCT) by calculating the translational and rotational differences between sCT and CT registrations to 4D CBCT. Results: The mean dose differences for the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR) between the CT and sCT plans were 0.0% and < 0.5% respectively. For positioning verification, the systematic translational and rotational differences were < 0.5 mm and < 0.5° respectively in all directions Conclusion: This is the first study to validate a sCT model for liver cancer in terms of both dosimetry and patient positioning, marking a significant step in demonstrating the feasibility of an MRI-only workflow for treating liver cancer. The generated sCT showed dosimetric differences within clinically acceptable levels and were successfully used as reference images for treatment position verification. This CycleGAN model is accessible through the research version of a commercial vendor, with potential for development as a clinical solution. .

评估基于深度学习的肝脏放射治疗合成ct生成模型的剂量学和定位精度。
背景和目的:仅mri工作流程需要合成计算机断层扫描(sCT)图像来进行剂量计算。本研究评估了深度学习生成的肝放疗sCT的剂量学和患者定位精度。方法和材料:使用CycleGAN算法生成11例患者的sCT图像。在CT上计算临床体积调制弧线治疗方案(VMAT),在sCT上重新计算,并使用剂量-体积直方图(DVH)评估剂量差异。为了位置验证,通过计算sCT和CT与4D CBCT配准之间的平移和旋转差异,将sCT图像作为4D锥束计算机断层扫描(4D CBCT)的参考图像进行验证。结果:CT和sCT计划靶体积(PTV)和危险器官(OAR)的平均剂量差异分别为0.0%和< 0.5%。对于定位验证,所有方向的系统平移和旋转差异分别< 0.5 mm和< 0.5° ;结论: ;这是第一个在剂量学和患者定位方面验证肝癌sCT模型的研究,标志着证明仅mri治疗肝癌工作流程的可行性迈出了重要的一步。生成的sCT显示在临床可接受水平内的剂量学差异,并成功用作治疗位置验证的参考图像。这种CycleGAN模型可以通过商业供应商的研究版本获得,具有作为临床解决方案开发的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
期刊介绍: BPEX is an inclusive, international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to publishing new research on any application of physics and/or engineering in medicine and/or biology. Characterized by a broad geographical coverage and a fast-track peer-review process, relevant topics include all aspects of biophysics, medical physics and biomedical engineering. Papers that are almost entirely clinical or biological in their focus are not suitable. The journal has an emphasis on publishing interdisciplinary work and bringing research fields together, encompassing experimental, theoretical and computational work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信