The paradox of enhancing male involvement in family planning uptake in rural Tanzania: insights from Bahi District, Dodoma Region.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Fabiola H Odira, Chakupewa J Mpambije, Yohannes E Kachenje
{"title":"The paradox of enhancing male involvement in family planning uptake in rural Tanzania: insights from Bahi District, Dodoma Region.","authors":"Fabiola H Odira, Chakupewa J Mpambije, Yohannes E Kachenje","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12467-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Family Planning (FP) is a requirement of global and national legal instruments to ensure its full provision to both men and women. Male involvement in FP is internationally streamlined to ensure it is achieved in resource-constrained countries. However, because of lack of sustainable means of ensuring men are fully engaged, less is documented on male involvement in FP uptake among developing countries. This study examined the paradox of enhancing male involvement in FP uptake in rural Tanzania.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study held from May to July 2022 employed mixed methods, whereby, quantitative and qualitative data were collected. A questionnaire was used to collect quantitative data from 90 respondents in Bahi District, whereas, in-depth interviews were conducted with 25 key informants. Quantitative data such as descriptive statistics including frequencies, cross tabulation and descriptive ratio statistics; categorical outcome predictions to specifically investigate relations; and cluster analysis to determine the relationship between variables related to this study, performing chi-square test was conducted through IBM SPSS software version 26. Besides, a thematic approach was employed for qualitative data to identify and interpret themes in the data set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most men are not effectively involved in FP due to several limitations that revolve around contextual issues emanating from institutional and community settings. It was revealed that 71% of respondents mentioned inefficient practice of specific policies and guidelines as limiting FP uptake. Also, 93% mentioned limited FP method choices for men, whereas 95% argued over the existing myths and misconceptions in the community, with 67% pointing to social norms limiting FP uptake. Religious beliefs were also cited as limiting male involvement in FP matters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Male involvement is an essential aspect of effective FP uptake. Given the low male involvement in Bahi District, this study recommends designing participatory programmes to enforce the available policy geared to improving male involvement is imperative. Thus, efforts are needed to ensure friendly environments in health facilities to attract males to accompany their partners for FP services. On the whole, effective community engagement from the local government is encouraged. In this, non-state actors have the opportunity to design effective interventions to address the problem.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"491"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11963310/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12467-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Family Planning (FP) is a requirement of global and national legal instruments to ensure its full provision to both men and women. Male involvement in FP is internationally streamlined to ensure it is achieved in resource-constrained countries. However, because of lack of sustainable means of ensuring men are fully engaged, less is documented on male involvement in FP uptake among developing countries. This study examined the paradox of enhancing male involvement in FP uptake in rural Tanzania.

Methods: The study held from May to July 2022 employed mixed methods, whereby, quantitative and qualitative data were collected. A questionnaire was used to collect quantitative data from 90 respondents in Bahi District, whereas, in-depth interviews were conducted with 25 key informants. Quantitative data such as descriptive statistics including frequencies, cross tabulation and descriptive ratio statistics; categorical outcome predictions to specifically investigate relations; and cluster analysis to determine the relationship between variables related to this study, performing chi-square test was conducted through IBM SPSS software version 26. Besides, a thematic approach was employed for qualitative data to identify and interpret themes in the data set.

Results: Most men are not effectively involved in FP due to several limitations that revolve around contextual issues emanating from institutional and community settings. It was revealed that 71% of respondents mentioned inefficient practice of specific policies and guidelines as limiting FP uptake. Also, 93% mentioned limited FP method choices for men, whereas 95% argued over the existing myths and misconceptions in the community, with 67% pointing to social norms limiting FP uptake. Religious beliefs were also cited as limiting male involvement in FP matters.

Conclusion: Male involvement is an essential aspect of effective FP uptake. Given the low male involvement in Bahi District, this study recommends designing participatory programmes to enforce the available policy geared to improving male involvement is imperative. Thus, efforts are needed to ensure friendly environments in health facilities to attract males to accompany their partners for FP services. On the whole, effective community engagement from the local government is encouraged. In this, non-state actors have the opportunity to design effective interventions to address the problem.

坦桑尼亚农村地区加强男性参与计划生育的悖论:来自多多马大区Bahi区的见解。
背景:计划生育是全球和国家法律文书的一项要求,以确保向男子和妇女充分提供计划生育。国际上简化了男性对计划生育的参与,以确保在资源有限的国家实现这一目标。然而,由于缺乏确保男子充分参与的可持续手段,关于发展中国家男子参与计划生育的记录较少。本研究考察了在坦桑尼亚农村提高男性参与计划生育的悖论。方法:研究于2022年5月至7月进行,采用混合方法,收集定量和定性数据。使用问卷收集了Bahi地区90名回答者的定量数据,并对25名关键举报人进行了深入访谈。定量数据,如描述性统计,包括频率、交叉表和描述性比率统计;分类结果预测,具体调查关系;聚类分析确定本研究相关变量之间的关系,通过IBM SPSS软件26版进行卡方检验。此外,对定性数据采用主题方法来识别和解释数据集中的主题。结果:大多数男性并没有有效地参与计划生育,这是由于一些限制,这些限制围绕着来自机构和社区环境的背景问题。据透露,71%的答复者提到具体政策和指导方针的低效做法限制了计划生育的采用。此外,93%的人提到了男性计划生育方法的选择有限,而95%的人对社区中现有的神话和误解进行了争论,67%的人指出社会规范限制了计划生育的接受。宗教信仰也被认为限制了男性参与计划生育事务。结论:男性参与是有效摄取卵磷脂的重要方面。鉴于Bahi地区的男性参与率较低,本研究建议设计参与性方案,以执行旨在改善男性参与率的现有政策。因此,需要努力确保卫生设施的友好环境,以吸引男性陪同其伴侣接受计划生育服务。总的来说,鼓励地方政府有效的社区参与。在这方面,非国家行为体有机会设计有效的干预措施来解决问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信