Addressing the Challenge of Successful One-Stage Lumpectomy for DCIS.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Joshua A Feinberg, Pabel Miah, Charles DiMaggio, Nakisa Pourkey, Jennifer Chun Kim, Jenny Goodgal, Amber Guth, Deborah Axelrod, Freya Schnabel
{"title":"Addressing the Challenge of Successful One-Stage Lumpectomy for DCIS.","authors":"Joshua A Feinberg, Pabel Miah, Charles DiMaggio, Nakisa Pourkey, Jennifer Chun Kim, Jenny Goodgal, Amber Guth, Deborah Axelrod, Freya Schnabel","doi":"10.1177/00031348251329496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundBreast conserving surgery represents the preferred surgical treatment option for patients with early-stage breast cancer. Reexcision rates are generally higher for patients undergoing lumpectomies for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) compared to invasive breast cancer, as the microscopic extent of disease is difficult to assess during excision. This study investigated the clinicopathological characteristics of patients undergoing BCS for pure DCIS and reexcision rates over time, including the effect of the MarginProbe™ device.MethodsWe queried our prospectively maintained Institutional Breast Cancer Database for patients diagnosed with DCIS and treated with BCS as their primary procedure from 2010-2021. The primary endpoint was the rate of reexcision. Variables of interest included age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, mode of diagnostic imaging, mammographic breast density, method of core biopsy, nuclear grade, size of DCIS, multifocality, DCIS subtype, and MarginProbe™ use.ResultsPapillary DCIS (<i>P</i> < 0.004) and larger size (<i>P</i> < 0.001) was associated with an increased reexcision rate. There were also differences in the method of core biopsy (<i>P</i> < 0.001), with stereotactic core biopsy predominating among patients who did not require reexcision (71.3% vs 49.5%). In an unadjusted estimate for the odds ratio for association, patients who had MarginProbe™ used were 81% less likely to require reexcision (OR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.12, 0.31, <i>P</i> < 0.0001).ConclusionYounger age, papillary DCIS, larger DCIS size, and non-stereotactic core biopsy method were found to be associated with higher reexcision rates. Additionally, patients whose primary procedures included intraoperative margin assessment with the MarginProbe™ were significantly less likely to require reexcision.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348251329496"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251329496","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundBreast conserving surgery represents the preferred surgical treatment option for patients with early-stage breast cancer. Reexcision rates are generally higher for patients undergoing lumpectomies for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) compared to invasive breast cancer, as the microscopic extent of disease is difficult to assess during excision. This study investigated the clinicopathological characteristics of patients undergoing BCS for pure DCIS and reexcision rates over time, including the effect of the MarginProbe™ device.MethodsWe queried our prospectively maintained Institutional Breast Cancer Database for patients diagnosed with DCIS and treated with BCS as their primary procedure from 2010-2021. The primary endpoint was the rate of reexcision. Variables of interest included age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, mode of diagnostic imaging, mammographic breast density, method of core biopsy, nuclear grade, size of DCIS, multifocality, DCIS subtype, and MarginProbe™ use.ResultsPapillary DCIS (P < 0.004) and larger size (P < 0.001) was associated with an increased reexcision rate. There were also differences in the method of core biopsy (P < 0.001), with stereotactic core biopsy predominating among patients who did not require reexcision (71.3% vs 49.5%). In an unadjusted estimate for the odds ratio for association, patients who had MarginProbe™ used were 81% less likely to require reexcision (OR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.12, 0.31, P < 0.0001).ConclusionYounger age, papillary DCIS, larger DCIS size, and non-stereotactic core biopsy method were found to be associated with higher reexcision rates. Additionally, patients whose primary procedures included intraoperative margin assessment with the MarginProbe™ were significantly less likely to require reexcision.

解决DCIS一期肿瘤切除成功的挑战。
背景保乳手术是早期乳腺癌患者的首选手术治疗方案。与浸润性乳腺癌相比,因导管原位癌(DCIS)接受肿块切除术的患者再切除率通常更高,因为在切除过程中很难评估疾病的微观范围。本研究调查了因纯 DCIS 而接受 BCS 治疗的患者的临床病理学特征以及随着时间推移的再切除率,包括 MarginProbe™ 设备的影响。方法我们查询了我们前瞻性维护的乳腺癌机构数据库,其中包含 2010-2021 年期间诊断为 DCIS 并接受 BCS 作为主要手术治疗的患者。主要终点是再次切除率。相关变量包括诊断时的年龄、种族/民族、诊断成像方式、乳腺密度、核心活检方法、核分级、DCIS 的大小、多灶性、DCIS 亚型以及 MarginProbe™ 的使用。核心活检的方法也存在差异(P < 0.001),在不需要再次切除的患者中,立体定向核心活检占多数(71.3% 对 49.5%)。结论年龄较小、乳头状 DCIS、DCIS 较大和非立体定向核心活检方法与较高的再切除率有关。此外,主要手术包括使用 MarginProbe™ 进行术中边缘评估的患者需要再次切除的几率要低得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信