Evaluation of protocol fidelity for prehospital antibiotic administration.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Laurel O'Connor, Michael Hall, John P Broach, Martin A Reznek
{"title":"Evaluation of protocol fidelity for prehospital antibiotic administration.","authors":"Laurel O'Connor, Michael Hall, John P Broach, Martin A Reznek","doi":"10.1111/acem.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis is a common, critical, time-sensitive medical emergency, with mortality rates of up to 56%. Early antibiotic administration is a cornerstone of sepsis management, yet prehospital antibiotic administration remains uncommon in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study evaluated the implementation of a prehospital sepsis protocol in an urban EMS system. Patients were eligible for prehospital antibiotic administration if they were ≥18 years old, hypotensive (SBP < 90 mm Hg), and febrile or hypothermic (<96.8°F or >100.4°F). Paramedics drew blood cultures and administered piperacillin/tazobactam or ceftriaxone. A report was generated to prospectively identify patients eligible for the study by hemodynamic data and/or if they were administered prehospital antibiotics. Demographic, operational, and clinical data were abstracted from patient care records and electronic health records. Outcomes were reported descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A sample of 147 patients was included for encounters from December 1, 2019, to December 1, 2024 (mean age 72.8 years, 31.3% female). Antibiotics were administered to 132 patients (89.8%). Of encounters with antibiotic administrations, 127/132 (96.2%) complied with the clinical protocol, and five (3.8%) were protocol violations. Additionally, six patients (4.1%) were inappropriately not administered antibiotics, and nine patients (6.1%) had contraindications to the protocol, so antibiotics were withheld. Of 356 blood culture bottles that underwent laboratory analysis, nine (2.5%) were contaminated. The mean (±SD) time from patient contact to antibiotics was 32.7 (±8.2) min.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prehospital clinicians can reliably and safely administer antibiotics for sepsis with hypotension and severe sepsis, observing high protocol adherence and low contamination rates while expediting time from recognition of sepsis to first antibiotics. These findings support the integration of prehospital antibiotics into broader sepsis care pathways. Expanding such protocols could improve compliance with sepsis care quality measures and enhance patient outcomes, particularly in resource-constrained environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.70015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is a common, critical, time-sensitive medical emergency, with mortality rates of up to 56%. Early antibiotic administration is a cornerstone of sepsis management, yet prehospital antibiotic administration remains uncommon in the United States.

Methods: This prospective observational study evaluated the implementation of a prehospital sepsis protocol in an urban EMS system. Patients were eligible for prehospital antibiotic administration if they were ≥18 years old, hypotensive (SBP < 90 mm Hg), and febrile or hypothermic (<96.8°F or >100.4°F). Paramedics drew blood cultures and administered piperacillin/tazobactam or ceftriaxone. A report was generated to prospectively identify patients eligible for the study by hemodynamic data and/or if they were administered prehospital antibiotics. Demographic, operational, and clinical data were abstracted from patient care records and electronic health records. Outcomes were reported descriptively.

Results: A sample of 147 patients was included for encounters from December 1, 2019, to December 1, 2024 (mean age 72.8 years, 31.3% female). Antibiotics were administered to 132 patients (89.8%). Of encounters with antibiotic administrations, 127/132 (96.2%) complied with the clinical protocol, and five (3.8%) were protocol violations. Additionally, six patients (4.1%) were inappropriately not administered antibiotics, and nine patients (6.1%) had contraindications to the protocol, so antibiotics were withheld. Of 356 blood culture bottles that underwent laboratory analysis, nine (2.5%) were contaminated. The mean (±SD) time from patient contact to antibiotics was 32.7 (±8.2) min.

Conclusions: Prehospital clinicians can reliably and safely administer antibiotics for sepsis with hypotension and severe sepsis, observing high protocol adherence and low contamination rates while expediting time from recognition of sepsis to first antibiotics. These findings support the integration of prehospital antibiotics into broader sepsis care pathways. Expanding such protocols could improve compliance with sepsis care quality measures and enhance patient outcomes, particularly in resource-constrained environments.

院前抗生素给药方案保真度评价。
背景:脓毒症是一种常见的、严重的、时间敏感的医疗紧急情况,死亡率高达56%。早期抗生素管理是败血症管理的基石,然而院前抗生素管理在美国仍然不常见。方法:本前瞻性观察研究评估了院前败血症方案在城市EMS系统中的实施情况。如果患者年龄≥18岁,低血压(SBP 100.4°F),则符合院前抗生素给药的条件。护理人员进行了血液培养,并给予哌拉西林/他唑巴坦或头孢曲松。生成了一份报告,通过血流动力学数据和/或院前使用抗生素来前瞻性地确定符合研究条件的患者。从患者护理记录和电子健康记录中提取人口统计、操作和临床数据。结果进行描述性报告。结果:2019年12月1日至2024年12月1日,纳入147例患者(平均年龄72.8岁,女性31.3%)。抗生素治疗132例(89.8%)。在使用抗生素的病例中,127/132(96.2%)符合临床方案,5例(3.8%)违反临床方案。此外,6例患者(4.1%)不恰当地不使用抗生素,9例患者(6.1%)有方案禁忌症,因此不使用抗生素。在接受实验室分析的356个血培养瓶中,有9个(2.5%)被污染。患者接触抗生素的平均(±SD)时间为32.7(±8.2)min。结论:院前临床医生可以可靠、安全地给脓毒症合并低血压和严重脓毒症的抗生素,观察到高的方案依从性和低污染率,同时加快了从识别脓毒症到首次使用抗生素的时间。这些发现支持院前抗生素整合到更广泛的败血症护理途径中。扩大这种方案可以提高败血症护理质量措施的依从性,并提高患者的预后,特别是在资源有限的环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine. The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more. Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信