Evaluation of phenotypic and genotypic methods for detecting KPC variants.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Yasmine Benhadid-Brahmi, Claire Amaris Hobson, Lydia Abdelmoumene, Ella Jaouen, Mélanie Magnan, Maud Gits-Muselli, Mathilde Lescat, Olivier Tenaillon, Stéphane Bonacorsi, André Birgy
{"title":"Evaluation of phenotypic and genotypic methods for detecting KPC variants.","authors":"Yasmine Benhadid-Brahmi, Claire Amaris Hobson, Lydia Abdelmoumene, Ella Jaouen, Mélanie Magnan, Maud Gits-Muselli, Mathilde Lescat, Olivier Tenaillon, Stéphane Bonacorsi, André Birgy","doi":"10.1128/aac.00082-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> carbapenemases (KPCs) have spread and diversified extensively. To date, 242 clinical variants have been identified and harbor different hydrolytic capacities, thereby interfering with rapid diagnostic tests. The accurate detection of KPC variants is crucial to guide treatment and control measures in healthcare settings. We constructed KPC variants to assess the mutational impact on detection capacities of resistance-based tests. KPC variants (<i>n</i> = 45) were characterized phenotypically and used to measure the detection sensitivity of KPC detection methods (two lateral flow immunoassays [LFIAs], three hydrolysis tests, three selective culture media, and two PCR-based tests). We identified four antibiotic susceptibility patterns: \"KPC-like\" (23/45; 51%), \"extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-like\" (6/45; 13%), \"ceftazidimase\" (9/45; 20%), and outlier variants with \"mixed-profiles\" (5/45; 11%). These phenotypes had different impacts on the detection capabilities of hydrolysis tests (0%-100%), LFIA (44%-100%), and selective culture media (0%-100%), highlighting a risk of misdiagnosis for some KPC variants. All variants were detected with PCR-based tests. To detect the maximum of KPC variants, fecal carriage screening requires a combination of selective media targeting resistance to carbapenems, third-generation cephalosporins, and ceftazidime-avibactam. From antibiotic susceptibility testing, resistance to ceftazidime ± avibactam and specific phenotypic profiles should be used as warnings to track the presence of KPC variants. We recommend LFIA as a first-line test, owing to its high sensitivity in detecting KPC variants. Nevertheless, using a combination of tests may remain wise in some situations. The spread of KPC variants remains a significant concern, particularly as reversion to ancestral phenotype could restore carbapenem resistance and lead to therapeutic failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":8152,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"e0008225"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00082-25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPCs) have spread and diversified extensively. To date, 242 clinical variants have been identified and harbor different hydrolytic capacities, thereby interfering with rapid diagnostic tests. The accurate detection of KPC variants is crucial to guide treatment and control measures in healthcare settings. We constructed KPC variants to assess the mutational impact on detection capacities of resistance-based tests. KPC variants (n = 45) were characterized phenotypically and used to measure the detection sensitivity of KPC detection methods (two lateral flow immunoassays [LFIAs], three hydrolysis tests, three selective culture media, and two PCR-based tests). We identified four antibiotic susceptibility patterns: "KPC-like" (23/45; 51%), "extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-like" (6/45; 13%), "ceftazidimase" (9/45; 20%), and outlier variants with "mixed-profiles" (5/45; 11%). These phenotypes had different impacts on the detection capabilities of hydrolysis tests (0%-100%), LFIA (44%-100%), and selective culture media (0%-100%), highlighting a risk of misdiagnosis for some KPC variants. All variants were detected with PCR-based tests. To detect the maximum of KPC variants, fecal carriage screening requires a combination of selective media targeting resistance to carbapenems, third-generation cephalosporins, and ceftazidime-avibactam. From antibiotic susceptibility testing, resistance to ceftazidime ± avibactam and specific phenotypic profiles should be used as warnings to track the presence of KPC variants. We recommend LFIA as a first-line test, owing to its high sensitivity in detecting KPC variants. Nevertheless, using a combination of tests may remain wise in some situations. The spread of KPC variants remains a significant concern, particularly as reversion to ancestral phenotype could restore carbapenem resistance and lead to therapeutic failure.

检测KPC变异的表型和基因型方法的评价。
肺炎克雷伯菌碳青霉烯酶(KPCs)广泛传播和多样化。迄今为止,已经发现了242种临床变异,它们具有不同的水解能力,从而干扰了快速诊断测试。准确检测KPC变异对于指导医疗机构的治疗和控制措施至关重要。我们构建了KPC变体,以评估突变对基于耐药性的检测能力的影响。对KPC变异(n = 45)进行表型表征,并用于测量KPC检测方法(两种侧流免疫测定法[LFIAs]、三种水解试验、三种选择性培养基和两种基于pcr的试验)的检测灵敏度。我们确定了四种抗生素敏感性模式:“kpc样”(23/45;51%),“扩展谱β -内酰胺酶样”(6/45;13%),“头孢他啶酶”(9/45;20%),以及具有“混合概况”的异常变体(5/45;11%)。这些表型对水解试验(0%-100%)、LFIA(44%-100%)和选择性培养基(0%-100%)的检测能力有不同的影响,突出了一些KPC变异的误诊风险。所有变异都是通过基于pcr的检测检测到的。为了检测最多的KPC变异,粪便载体筛选需要结合选择性培养基,靶向对碳青霉烯类、第三代头孢菌素和头孢他啶-阿维巴坦的耐药性。从抗生素药敏试验来看,对头孢他啶±阿维巴坦的耐药性和特定的表型特征应作为追踪KPC变异存在的警告。我们推荐LFIA作为一线检测,因为它在检测KPC变体方面具有很高的灵敏度。然而,在某些情况下,使用组合测试可能仍然是明智的。KPC变异的传播仍然是一个值得关注的问题,特别是因为恢复祖先表型可能恢复碳青霉烯类耐药性并导致治疗失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
8.20%
发文量
762
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (AAC) features interdisciplinary studies that build our understanding of the underlying mechanisms and therapeutic applications of antimicrobial and antiparasitic agents and chemotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信