Impact of the baby friendly community initiative on breastfeeding outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Yuen Fan Chan , Hoi Lam Ip , Ka Hing Yip , Martha Sin Lam Choi , Ying Wei Fan , Patrick Ip , Karen Kar Loen Chan , Kris Yuet Wan Lok
{"title":"Impact of the baby friendly community initiative on breastfeeding outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Yuen Fan Chan ,&nbsp;Hoi Lam Ip ,&nbsp;Ka Hing Yip ,&nbsp;Martha Sin Lam Choi ,&nbsp;Ying Wei Fan ,&nbsp;Patrick Ip ,&nbsp;Karen Kar Loen Chan ,&nbsp;Kris Yuet Wan Lok","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To examine the impact of the Baby Friendly Community Initiative (BFCI) on breastfeeding outcomes worldwide, specifically the duration of any and exclusive breastfeeding, compared to standard maternal care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. Seven electronic databases were searched from November 1998 to July 2024. Quantitative studies examining the effects of BFCI on breastfeeding outcomes were included. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tools and NHLBI study quality assessment tools. Narrative synthesis was performed for studies not suitable for meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 14,495 identified records, 13 were included after the removal of duplicates and ineligible articles. The majority of included studies found that BFCI, whether implemented partially, fully or in combination with other initiatives, is an effective intervention for improving breastfeeding outcomes. The meta-analysis showed an increase prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months postpartum in BFCI group (OR=4.00; 95 % CI 1.29–12.38, <em>P</em> = 0.02). Further studies are needed to investigate the statistical significance of BFCI on any breastfeeding from 6 months to 2 years postpartum.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>BFCI has the potential to significantly enhance long-term exclusive breastfeeding rates and may also improve any breastfeeding rates from 6 months onward. However, the nature of BFCI implementation posed limitations to study design, which reduced the overall methodological quality of the included studies.</div></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><div>The protocol for this review was registered on PROSPERO (registration number CRD42023460801) on 17th September 2023<em>.</em></div></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 104395"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613825001135","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To examine the impact of the Baby Friendly Community Initiative (BFCI) on breastfeeding outcomes worldwide, specifically the duration of any and exclusive breastfeeding, compared to standard maternal care.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. Seven electronic databases were searched from November 1998 to July 2024. Quantitative studies examining the effects of BFCI on breastfeeding outcomes were included. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tools and NHLBI study quality assessment tools. Narrative synthesis was performed for studies not suitable for meta-analysis.

Results

Out of 14,495 identified records, 13 were included after the removal of duplicates and ineligible articles. The majority of included studies found that BFCI, whether implemented partially, fully or in combination with other initiatives, is an effective intervention for improving breastfeeding outcomes. The meta-analysis showed an increase prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months postpartum in BFCI group (OR=4.00; 95 % CI 1.29–12.38, P = 0.02). Further studies are needed to investigate the statistical significance of BFCI on any breastfeeding from 6 months to 2 years postpartum.

Discussion

BFCI has the potential to significantly enhance long-term exclusive breastfeeding rates and may also improve any breastfeeding rates from 6 months onward. However, the nature of BFCI implementation posed limitations to study design, which reduced the overall methodological quality of the included studies.

Registration

The protocol for this review was registered on PROSPERO (registration number CRD42023460801) on 17th September 2023.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信