Deep-learning synthetized 4DCT from 4DMRI of the abdominal site in carbon-ion radiotherapy

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Nakas Anestis , Hladchuk Maksym , Parrella Giovanni , Vai Alessandro , Molinelli Silvia , Camagni Francesca , Vitolo Viviana , Barcellini Amelia , Imparato Sara , Pella Andrea , Ciocca Mario , Orlandi Ester , Paganelli Chiara , Baroni Guido
{"title":"Deep-learning synthetized 4DCT from 4DMRI of the abdominal site in carbon-ion radiotherapy","authors":"Nakas Anestis ,&nbsp;Hladchuk Maksym ,&nbsp;Parrella Giovanni ,&nbsp;Vai Alessandro ,&nbsp;Molinelli Silvia ,&nbsp;Camagni Francesca ,&nbsp;Vitolo Viviana ,&nbsp;Barcellini Amelia ,&nbsp;Imparato Sara ,&nbsp;Pella Andrea ,&nbsp;Ciocca Mario ,&nbsp;Orlandi Ester ,&nbsp;Paganelli Chiara ,&nbsp;Baroni Guido","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.104963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To investigate the feasibility of deep-learning-based synthetic 4DCT (4D-sCT) generation from 4DMRI data of abdominal patients undergoing Carbon Ion Radiotherapy (CIRT).</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>A 3-channel conditional Generative Adversarial Network (cGAN) was trained and tested on twenty-six patients, using paired T1-weighted 4DMRI and 4DCT volumes. 4D-sCT data were generated via the cGAN following a 3-channels segmentation approach (air, bone, soft tissue) in two scenarios: (a) 4DCT-based approach (i.e. segmentation relying on 4DCT) and (b) 4DMRI-based approach (i.e. manual segmentation on 4DMRI, to simulate a 4DMRI-only scenario). The network was first validated on a 4D computational phantom, where a ground truth dataset was available. Subsequently, the network was tested on 6 independent held-out-of-training patients. Generated volumes were evaluated with respect to the original 4DCT based on motion analysis, similarity metrics (e.g. Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Normalized Cross Coefficient (NCC)) and dosimetric criteria, by means of recalculating clinically optimized CIRT plans on the 4D-sCT.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For the phantom, similarity metrics were in line with literature results, while dose volume histogram values were below 0.9 %. 4DCT-based patient results demonstrated an accurate representation with respect to the original 4DCT images (MAE: 50.64–51.29 HU), while 4DMRI-only-based results yielded higher values (MAE: 81.15–90.22 HU). Gamma pass rates (3 %/3mm) were ∼ 97 % for the 4DCT-based scenario, showing dosimetric consistency between the compared 4DCT and 4D-sCT dose distributions. D95% values on GTV/CTV were within clinical tolerances for the 4DMRI-only scenario.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Deep learning-based 4D-sCT generation shows potential to support treatment planning in abdominal tumors treated with CIRT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 104963"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179725000730","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the feasibility of deep-learning-based synthetic 4DCT (4D-sCT) generation from 4DMRI data of abdominal patients undergoing Carbon Ion Radiotherapy (CIRT).

Material and methods

A 3-channel conditional Generative Adversarial Network (cGAN) was trained and tested on twenty-six patients, using paired T1-weighted 4DMRI and 4DCT volumes. 4D-sCT data were generated via the cGAN following a 3-channels segmentation approach (air, bone, soft tissue) in two scenarios: (a) 4DCT-based approach (i.e. segmentation relying on 4DCT) and (b) 4DMRI-based approach (i.e. manual segmentation on 4DMRI, to simulate a 4DMRI-only scenario). The network was first validated on a 4D computational phantom, where a ground truth dataset was available. Subsequently, the network was tested on 6 independent held-out-of-training patients. Generated volumes were evaluated with respect to the original 4DCT based on motion analysis, similarity metrics (e.g. Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Normalized Cross Coefficient (NCC)) and dosimetric criteria, by means of recalculating clinically optimized CIRT plans on the 4D-sCT.

Results

For the phantom, similarity metrics were in line with literature results, while dose volume histogram values were below 0.9 %. 4DCT-based patient results demonstrated an accurate representation with respect to the original 4DCT images (MAE: 50.64–51.29 HU), while 4DMRI-only-based results yielded higher values (MAE: 81.15–90.22 HU). Gamma pass rates (3 %/3mm) were ∼ 97 % for the 4DCT-based scenario, showing dosimetric consistency between the compared 4DCT and 4D-sCT dose distributions. D95% values on GTV/CTV were within clinical tolerances for the 4DMRI-only scenario.

Conclusion

Deep learning-based 4D-sCT generation shows potential to support treatment planning in abdominal tumors treated with CIRT.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
493
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics: Medical Imaging Radiation Therapy Radiation Protection Measuring Systems and Signal Processing Education and training in Medical Physics Professional issues in Medical Physics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信