{"title":"Assessment of CT-to-physical density table for multiple image reconstruction functions with a large-bore scanner for radiotherapy treatment planning","authors":"Takuro Okumura , Akito S. Koganezawa , Takeo Nakashima , Yusuke Ochi , Kento Tsubouchi , Yuji Murakami","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.104970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the performance of the Aquilion Exceed LB computed tomography (CT) scanner for radiotherapy treatment planning, this study examined the effect of different combinations of the image reconstruction function (IRF) (AiCE and AIDR) and scan parameters on the CT-to-physical density (CT-PD) table and radiation dose in the phantom, and the effect of different object positions on CT values.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>To investigate IRF’s influence on each material, we calculated CT values by varying tube current, pitch, field of view (FOV), and phantom position for each IRF, comparing them with reference values using filtered back projection (FBP). Furthermore, we evaluated changes in depth dose values due to IRF differences using a solid phantom.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the combinations of changes in IRF and scan parameters the change in CT value (<span><math><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mi>H</mi><mi>U</mi></mrow></math></span>) of each material was within <span><math><mo>±</mo></math></span>10 HU, except for most conditions. The change in physical density (<span><math><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mi>P</mi><mi>D</mi></mrow></math></span>) was within <span><math><mo>±</mo></math></span>0.02 g/cm<sup>3</sup> for all combinations. For changes in phantom position, <span><math><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mi>H</mi><mi>U</mi></mrow></math></span> was within <span><math><mo>±</mo></math></span>25 HU for changes within the scan FOV, except for Bone 200 mg/cc and 1250 mg/cc. In areas outside the scan FOV with an expanded FOV, <span><math><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mi>H</mi><mi>U</mi></mrow></math></span> was significantly larger than within the scan FOV. Variations in depth dose for different IRFs using solid phantoms were within <span><math><mo>±</mo></math></span>0.5 %, except at material boundaries.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our evaluations of the CT values and dose calculations suggested no need to change the CT-PD table, even with multiple IRFs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 104970"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179725000808","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the performance of the Aquilion Exceed LB computed tomography (CT) scanner for radiotherapy treatment planning, this study examined the effect of different combinations of the image reconstruction function (IRF) (AiCE and AIDR) and scan parameters on the CT-to-physical density (CT-PD) table and radiation dose in the phantom, and the effect of different object positions on CT values.
Methods
To investigate IRF’s influence on each material, we calculated CT values by varying tube current, pitch, field of view (FOV), and phantom position for each IRF, comparing them with reference values using filtered back projection (FBP). Furthermore, we evaluated changes in depth dose values due to IRF differences using a solid phantom.
Results
In the combinations of changes in IRF and scan parameters the change in CT value () of each material was within 10 HU, except for most conditions. The change in physical density () was within 0.02 g/cm3 for all combinations. For changes in phantom position, was within 25 HU for changes within the scan FOV, except for Bone 200 mg/cc and 1250 mg/cc. In areas outside the scan FOV with an expanded FOV, was significantly larger than within the scan FOV. Variations in depth dose for different IRFs using solid phantoms were within 0.5 %, except at material boundaries.
Conclusion
Our evaluations of the CT values and dose calculations suggested no need to change the CT-PD table, even with multiple IRFs.
期刊介绍:
Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics:
Medical Imaging
Radiation Therapy
Radiation Protection
Measuring Systems and Signal Processing
Education and training in Medical Physics
Professional issues in Medical Physics.