Assessment of CT-to-physical density table for multiple image reconstruction functions with a large-bore scanner for radiotherapy treatment planning

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Takuro Okumura , Akito S. Koganezawa , Takeo Nakashima , Yusuke Ochi , Kento Tsubouchi , Yuji Murakami
{"title":"Assessment of CT-to-physical density table for multiple image reconstruction functions with a large-bore scanner for radiotherapy treatment planning","authors":"Takuro Okumura ,&nbsp;Akito S. Koganezawa ,&nbsp;Takeo Nakashima ,&nbsp;Yusuke Ochi ,&nbsp;Kento Tsubouchi ,&nbsp;Yuji Murakami","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.104970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the performance of the Aquilion Exceed LB computed tomography (CT) scanner for radiotherapy treatment planning, this study examined the effect of different combinations of the image reconstruction function (IRF) (AiCE and AIDR) and scan parameters on the CT-to-physical density (CT-PD) table and radiation dose in the phantom, and the effect of different object positions on CT values.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>To investigate IRF’s influence on each material, we calculated CT values by varying tube current, pitch, field of view (FOV), and phantom position for each IRF, comparing them with reference values using filtered back projection (FBP). Furthermore, we evaluated changes in depth dose values due to IRF differences using a solid phantom.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the combinations of changes in IRF and scan parameters the change in CT value (<span><math><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mi>H</mi><mi>U</mi></mrow></math></span>) of each material was within <span><math><mo>±</mo></math></span>10 HU, except for most conditions. The change in physical density (<span><math><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mi>P</mi><mi>D</mi></mrow></math></span>) was within <span><math><mo>±</mo></math></span>0.02 g/cm<sup>3</sup> for all combinations. For changes in phantom position, <span><math><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mi>H</mi><mi>U</mi></mrow></math></span> was within <span><math><mo>±</mo></math></span>25 HU for changes within the scan FOV, except for Bone 200 mg/cc and 1250 mg/cc. In areas outside the scan FOV with an expanded FOV, <span><math><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mi>H</mi><mi>U</mi></mrow></math></span> was significantly larger than within the scan FOV. Variations in depth dose for different IRFs using solid phantoms were within <span><math><mo>±</mo></math></span>0.5 %, except at material boundaries.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our evaluations of the CT values and dose calculations suggested no need to change the CT-PD table, even with multiple IRFs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 104970"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179725000808","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the performance of the Aquilion Exceed LB computed tomography (CT) scanner for radiotherapy treatment planning, this study examined the effect of different combinations of the image reconstruction function (IRF) (AiCE and AIDR) and scan parameters on the CT-to-physical density (CT-PD) table and radiation dose in the phantom, and the effect of different object positions on CT values.

Methods

To investigate IRF’s influence on each material, we calculated CT values by varying tube current, pitch, field of view (FOV), and phantom position for each IRF, comparing them with reference values using filtered back projection (FBP). Furthermore, we evaluated changes in depth dose values due to IRF differences using a solid phantom.

Results

In the combinations of changes in IRF and scan parameters the change in CT value (ΔHU) of each material was within ±10 HU, except for most conditions. The change in physical density (ΔPD) was within ±0.02 g/cm3 for all combinations. For changes in phantom position, ΔHU was within ±25 HU for changes within the scan FOV, except for Bone 200 mg/cc and 1250 mg/cc. In areas outside the scan FOV with an expanded FOV, ΔHU was significantly larger than within the scan FOV. Variations in depth dose for different IRFs using solid phantoms were within ±0.5 %, except at material boundaries.

Conclusion

Our evaluations of the CT values and dose calculations suggested no need to change the CT-PD table, even with multiple IRFs.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
493
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics: Medical Imaging Radiation Therapy Radiation Protection Measuring Systems and Signal Processing Education and training in Medical Physics Professional issues in Medical Physics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信