Leveraging cluster analysis to compare click and chirp-evoked auditory brainstem responses

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Hasitha Wimalarathna , Patricia LeeAnn Youngblood , Caroline Parker , Charles G. Marx , Sangamanatha Ankmnal-Veeranna
{"title":"Leveraging cluster analysis to compare click and chirp-evoked auditory brainstem responses","authors":"Hasitha Wimalarathna ,&nbsp;Patricia LeeAnn Youngblood ,&nbsp;Caroline Parker ,&nbsp;Charles G. Marx ,&nbsp;Sangamanatha Ankmnal-Veeranna","doi":"10.1016/j.cmpb.2025.108732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Objective:</h3><div>The Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) can be recorded by presenting short-duration click and chirp stimuli. The ABR test is commonly used for threshold estimation and to examine auditory brainstem integrity. The neural integrity is evaluated at suprathreshold levels. This study aimed to compare click and CE-Chirp®-evoked ABRs recorded at suprathreshold levels in normal-hearing infants and adults, using cluster analysis to identify patterns and distinctions between responses to the two stimuli.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>Click-evoked and CE-Chirp® evoked ABRs were recorded from infants and adults with normal hearing at suprathreshold levels. Cluster analysis techniques examined and categorized response patterns for each stimulus type, comparing across time, frequency and time–frequency domains.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>Our findings indicate a noticeable homogeneity in the click-evoked ABRs in both groups in the time-domain, suggesting a consistent response to click stimuli. In contrast, CE-Chirp®-evoked ABRs exhibited variability in both groups, which may be attributable to the complex nature of the CE-Chirp® stimulus and its interaction with the auditory system.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>The implications of these findings are significant for audiologists. It is crucial to take into account the inherent variability of these responses when interpreting chirp-evoked ABRs, as they may reflect nuanced aspects of auditory system function that are not as prominent in the more uniform click-evoked ABRs. The insights from this study enhance our understanding of auditory brainstem processing and have the potential to refine the clinical protocols for ABR testing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10624,"journal":{"name":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine","volume":"265 ","pages":"Article 108732"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016926072500149X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objective:

The Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) can be recorded by presenting short-duration click and chirp stimuli. The ABR test is commonly used for threshold estimation and to examine auditory brainstem integrity. The neural integrity is evaluated at suprathreshold levels. This study aimed to compare click and CE-Chirp®-evoked ABRs recorded at suprathreshold levels in normal-hearing infants and adults, using cluster analysis to identify patterns and distinctions between responses to the two stimuli.

Methods:

Click-evoked and CE-Chirp® evoked ABRs were recorded from infants and adults with normal hearing at suprathreshold levels. Cluster analysis techniques examined and categorized response patterns for each stimulus type, comparing across time, frequency and time–frequency domains.

Results:

Our findings indicate a noticeable homogeneity in the click-evoked ABRs in both groups in the time-domain, suggesting a consistent response to click stimuli. In contrast, CE-Chirp®-evoked ABRs exhibited variability in both groups, which may be attributable to the complex nature of the CE-Chirp® stimulus and its interaction with the auditory system.

Conclusion:

The implications of these findings are significant for audiologists. It is crucial to take into account the inherent variability of these responses when interpreting chirp-evoked ABRs, as they may reflect nuanced aspects of auditory system function that are not as prominent in the more uniform click-evoked ABRs. The insights from this study enhance our understanding of auditory brainstem processing and have the potential to refine the clinical protocols for ABR testing.
利用聚类分析比较点击和啾啾引起的听觉脑干反应
背景与目的:听觉脑干反应(ABR)可以通过短时间的咔哒声和啁啾声刺激来记录。ABR测试通常用于阈值估计和检查听觉脑干完整性。在阈上水平评估神经完整性。本研究旨在比较正常听力婴儿和成人在超阈值水平下记录的咔哒声和CE-Chirp®诱发的abr,使用聚类分析来识别对两种刺激的反应模式和区别。方法:记录听力正常的婴儿和成人在阈值以上水平的点击诱发和CE-Chirp®诱发的abr。聚类分析技术检查并分类了每种刺激类型的反应模式,比较了时间、频率和时频域。结果:我们的研究结果表明,两组的点击诱发的abr在时域上具有明显的同质性,表明对点击刺激的反应是一致的。相比之下,CE-Chirp®诱发的abr在两组中表现出可变性,这可能归因于CE-Chirp®刺激的复杂性及其与听觉系统的相互作用。结论:这些发现对听力学家具有重要意义。在解释啁啾诱发的abr时,考虑到这些反应的内在可变性是至关重要的,因为它们可能反映了听觉系统功能的微妙方面,而这些方面在更统一的点击诱发的abr中并不那么突出。这项研究的见解增强了我们对听觉脑干处理的理解,并有可能完善ABR测试的临床方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computer methods and programs in biomedicine
Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
6.60%
发文量
601
审稿时长
135 days
期刊介绍: To encourage the development of formal computing methods, and their application in biomedical research and medical practice, by illustration of fundamental principles in biomedical informatics research; to stimulate basic research into application software design; to report the state of research of biomedical information processing projects; to report new computer methodologies applied in biomedical areas; the eventual distribution of demonstrable software to avoid duplication of effort; to provide a forum for discussion and improvement of existing software; to optimize contact between national organizations and regional user groups by promoting an international exchange of information on formal methods, standards and software in biomedicine. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine covers computing methodology and software systems derived from computing science for implementation in all aspects of biomedical research and medical practice. It is designed to serve: biochemists; biologists; geneticists; immunologists; neuroscientists; pharmacologists; toxicologists; clinicians; epidemiologists; psychiatrists; psychologists; cardiologists; chemists; (radio)physicists; computer scientists; programmers and systems analysts; biomedical, clinical, electrical and other engineers; teachers of medical informatics and users of educational software.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信