Camino F. de la Hoz , Paul R. Brooks , Jennifer Coughlan , Inés Mazarrasa , Elvira Ramos , Samuel Sainz-Villegas , Araceli Puente , Jose A. Juanes , Tasman P. Crowe
{"title":"Unveiling growth and carbon composition of macroalgae with different strategies under global change","authors":"Camino F. de la Hoz , Paul R. Brooks , Jennifer Coughlan , Inés Mazarrasa , Elvira Ramos , Samuel Sainz-Villegas , Araceli Puente , Jose A. Juanes , Tasman P. Crowe","doi":"10.1016/j.marenvres.2025.107128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Marine macroalgae ecosystems are increasingly recognized as potential contributors to carbon sequestration within blue carbon strategies. This study investigates how the carbon storage capacity of two macroalgal species with different living strategies, <em>Fucus vesiculosus</em> (k-strategy, slow-growing) and <em>Ulva lactuca</em> (r-strategy, fast-growing), respond to the individual or combined impacts of two drivers of global change, eutrophication and marine heatwaves. Differences in growth, biomass and carbon accumulation were assessed after 7 and 14 days in two experiments (field and laboratory) that tested different combinations of nutrient enrichment (increase nutrient/surface area of 1 g/cm<sup>2</sup> in the field experiment and a concentration of 10 ml/l of Provasoli solution in the laboratory) and warming (5 °C increase) treatments. Results revealed that nutrient addition treatments had significant effects, reducing carbon incorporation by up to 22.5 % in <em>F. vesiculosus</em> compared to control. This reduction was particularly evident in the field experiment, suggesting that eutrophication negatively impacts the carbon storage potential of this slow-growing species. However, <em>F. vesiculosus</em> demonstrated greater resilience in maintaining biomass stability, whereas <em>U. lactuca</em> exhibited reduced growth and carbon accumulation under natural conditions. These findings highlight species-specific differences in carbon assimilation and biomass composition among macroalgae, which can influence their potential contribution to carbon cycling and storage in marine ecosystems, shaped by their ecological and physiological traits, and emphasize the importance of nutrient management for optimizing blue carbon storage. This research contributes to our understanding of macroalgae's role in climate mitigation and underscores the need for targeted conservation strategies to enhance their ecosystem services.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18204,"journal":{"name":"Marine environmental research","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 107128"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine environmental research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141113625001850","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Marine macroalgae ecosystems are increasingly recognized as potential contributors to carbon sequestration within blue carbon strategies. This study investigates how the carbon storage capacity of two macroalgal species with different living strategies, Fucus vesiculosus (k-strategy, slow-growing) and Ulva lactuca (r-strategy, fast-growing), respond to the individual or combined impacts of two drivers of global change, eutrophication and marine heatwaves. Differences in growth, biomass and carbon accumulation were assessed after 7 and 14 days in two experiments (field and laboratory) that tested different combinations of nutrient enrichment (increase nutrient/surface area of 1 g/cm2 in the field experiment and a concentration of 10 ml/l of Provasoli solution in the laboratory) and warming (5 °C increase) treatments. Results revealed that nutrient addition treatments had significant effects, reducing carbon incorporation by up to 22.5 % in F. vesiculosus compared to control. This reduction was particularly evident in the field experiment, suggesting that eutrophication negatively impacts the carbon storage potential of this slow-growing species. However, F. vesiculosus demonstrated greater resilience in maintaining biomass stability, whereas U. lactuca exhibited reduced growth and carbon accumulation under natural conditions. These findings highlight species-specific differences in carbon assimilation and biomass composition among macroalgae, which can influence their potential contribution to carbon cycling and storage in marine ecosystems, shaped by their ecological and physiological traits, and emphasize the importance of nutrient management for optimizing blue carbon storage. This research contributes to our understanding of macroalgae's role in climate mitigation and underscores the need for targeted conservation strategies to enhance their ecosystem services.
期刊介绍:
Marine Environmental Research publishes original research papers on chemical, physical, and biological interactions in the oceans and coastal waters. The journal serves as a forum for new information on biology, chemistry, and toxicology and syntheses that advance understanding of marine environmental processes.
Submission of multidisciplinary studies is encouraged. Studies that utilize experimental approaches to clarify the roles of anthropogenic and natural causes of changes in marine ecosystems are especially welcome, as are those studies that represent new developments of a theoretical or conceptual aspect of marine science. All papers published in this journal are reviewed by qualified peers prior to acceptance and publication. Examples of topics considered to be appropriate for the journal include, but are not limited to, the following:
– The extent, persistence, and consequences of change and the recovery from such change in natural marine systems
– The biochemical, physiological, and ecological consequences of contaminants to marine organisms and ecosystems
– The biogeochemistry of naturally occurring and anthropogenic substances
– Models that describe and predict the above processes
– Monitoring studies, to the extent that their results provide new information on functional processes
– Methodological papers describing improved quantitative techniques for the marine sciences.