Sandra M. Shi, Faith-Anne Rapley, Heather Margulis, Roger J. Laham, Kimberly Guibone, Edward Percy, Tsuyoshi Kaneko, Kuan-Yuan Wang, Dae Hyun Kim
{"title":"Home-Based Rehabilitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (REHAB-TAVR): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Sandra M. Shi, Faith-Anne Rapley, Heather Margulis, Roger J. Laham, Kimberly Guibone, Edward Percy, Tsuyoshi Kaneko, Kuan-Yuan Wang, Dae Hyun Kim","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The benefit of early cardiac rehabilitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is not well established. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility and short-term effects of a home-based exercise program, with or without cognitive-behavioral intervention (CBI).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We randomized 51 patients (mean age, 83.9 years; 19 women) to a home-based exercise program with CBI (Group A; <i>n</i> = 18) or without CBI (Group B; <i>n</i> = 15), or telephone-based education control (Group C; <i>n</i> = 18). The exercise program focusing on balance, flexibility, strength, and endurance began within 7 days post-discharge and was delivered once weekly by a physical therapist for 8 weeks. CBI included discussions on exercise benefits and barriers, goal setting, detailed exercise planning, and a weekly cash adherence incentive. The primary outcome was a disability score (range: 0–22; higher scores indicate greater disability) at 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes included the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) (range: 0–12; higher scores indicate better function), self-efficacy, and outcome expectation scores. Feasibility outcomes included adherence and drop-out rates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fifteen participants (83.3%) in Group A, 10 (58.8%) in Group B, and 10 (52.6%) in Group C completed ≥ 5 of the eight assigned weekly sessions (<i>p</i> = 0.196). Two participants in each group were lost to follow-up. At 8 weeks, the home-based exercise groups (Group A and B combined) demonstrated lower disability scores (mean [SE]: 2.6 [0.3] vs. 4.5 [0.5]; <i>p</i> = 0.042) and higher SPPB scores (9.5 [0.6] vs. 6.5 [0.8]; <i>p</i> = 0.003) compared with the education group (Group C). Group A had lower disability scores than Group B (2.1 [0.4] vs. 3.4 [0.5]; <i>p</i> = 0.047), with no differences in self-efficacy and outcome expectation scores.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>An early, home-based, multi-domain exercise program appears feasible and may prevent disability and improve physical function in older adults after TAVR. Adding CBI, including a modest cash incentive, showed trends toward improved adherence and reduced disability.</p>\n \n <p>\n <b>Trial Registration:</b> NCT02805309</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"73 6","pages":"1836-1846"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19456","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The benefit of early cardiac rehabilitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is not well established. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility and short-term effects of a home-based exercise program, with or without cognitive-behavioral intervention (CBI).
Methods
We randomized 51 patients (mean age, 83.9 years; 19 women) to a home-based exercise program with CBI (Group A; n = 18) or without CBI (Group B; n = 15), or telephone-based education control (Group C; n = 18). The exercise program focusing on balance, flexibility, strength, and endurance began within 7 days post-discharge and was delivered once weekly by a physical therapist for 8 weeks. CBI included discussions on exercise benefits and barriers, goal setting, detailed exercise planning, and a weekly cash adherence incentive. The primary outcome was a disability score (range: 0–22; higher scores indicate greater disability) at 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes included the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) (range: 0–12; higher scores indicate better function), self-efficacy, and outcome expectation scores. Feasibility outcomes included adherence and drop-out rates.
Results
Fifteen participants (83.3%) in Group A, 10 (58.8%) in Group B, and 10 (52.6%) in Group C completed ≥ 5 of the eight assigned weekly sessions (p = 0.196). Two participants in each group were lost to follow-up. At 8 weeks, the home-based exercise groups (Group A and B combined) demonstrated lower disability scores (mean [SE]: 2.6 [0.3] vs. 4.5 [0.5]; p = 0.042) and higher SPPB scores (9.5 [0.6] vs. 6.5 [0.8]; p = 0.003) compared with the education group (Group C). Group A had lower disability scores than Group B (2.1 [0.4] vs. 3.4 [0.5]; p = 0.047), with no differences in self-efficacy and outcome expectation scores.
Conclusions
An early, home-based, multi-domain exercise program appears feasible and may prevent disability and improve physical function in older adults after TAVR. Adding CBI, including a modest cash incentive, showed trends toward improved adherence and reduced disability.
期刊介绍:
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.