Orthopaedic infections: novel treatment strategies and evolving concepts.

Christopher Lee, I Leah Gitajn, Kyle Schweser, Joseph Wenke, Edward McPherson, Jack Wixted
{"title":"Orthopaedic infections: novel treatment strategies and evolving concepts.","authors":"Christopher Lee, I Leah Gitajn, Kyle Schweser, Joseph Wenke, Edward McPherson, Jack Wixted","doi":"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Orthopaedic infections remain challenging complications to treat, with profound economic impact in addition to patient morbidity. The overall rate of infection following orthopaedic surgery with internal fixation devices has been estimated at 5%, with hospital costs 8 times that of those without fracture-related infections and with significantly poorer outcomes regarding function and pain. Fracture-related infections (FRIs) occur in approximately 20% of all trauma cases, and treatment has evolved very little over the years. While union can be achieved 70%-89% of the time, long-term recurrence rates vary between 9% and 58% and retention of implants is only around 30%-40%. This is underscored by the financial, psychosocial, and physical burden placed on the patients. The difficult management of FRIs is multifactorial; however, a major contributor is biofilm. Alternative treatment strategies to combat biofilm have come in the form of photodynamic therapy and bacteriophage therapy. Use of local antibiotic therapy in the form of powder and dissolvable antibiotic beads has continued to be expanded, with new applications explored. Systemic antibiotic use has continued to be optimized, with new treatment protocols calling for per os (PO) administration as opposed to intravenous. In conclusion, orthopaedic infections remain difficult clinical dilemmas, although evolving prevention and treatment modalities continue to emerge.</p>","PeriodicalId":74381,"journal":{"name":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","volume":"8 2 Suppl","pages":"e395"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11956753/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Orthopaedic infections remain challenging complications to treat, with profound economic impact in addition to patient morbidity. The overall rate of infection following orthopaedic surgery with internal fixation devices has been estimated at 5%, with hospital costs 8 times that of those without fracture-related infections and with significantly poorer outcomes regarding function and pain. Fracture-related infections (FRIs) occur in approximately 20% of all trauma cases, and treatment has evolved very little over the years. While union can be achieved 70%-89% of the time, long-term recurrence rates vary between 9% and 58% and retention of implants is only around 30%-40%. This is underscored by the financial, psychosocial, and physical burden placed on the patients. The difficult management of FRIs is multifactorial; however, a major contributor is biofilm. Alternative treatment strategies to combat biofilm have come in the form of photodynamic therapy and bacteriophage therapy. Use of local antibiotic therapy in the form of powder and dissolvable antibiotic beads has continued to be expanded, with new applications explored. Systemic antibiotic use has continued to be optimized, with new treatment protocols calling for per os (PO) administration as opposed to intravenous. In conclusion, orthopaedic infections remain difficult clinical dilemmas, although evolving prevention and treatment modalities continue to emerge.

骨科感染:新的治疗策略和不断发展的概念。
骨科感染仍然是具有挑战性的并发症,除了患者发病率外,还具有深远的经济影响。使用内固定装置进行骨科手术后的总体感染率估计为5%,住院费用是没有骨折相关感染的患者的8倍,而且在功能和疼痛方面的预后明显较差。骨折相关感染(FRIs)约占所有创伤病例的20%,多年来治疗进展甚微。虽然70%-89%的时间可以愈合,但长期复发率在9% - 58%之间,植入物的保留率仅为30%-40%左右。患者身上的经济、社会心理和身体负担更突出了这一点。fri的管理困难是多因素的;然而,一个主要的贡献者是生物膜。对抗生物膜的替代治疗策略以光动力疗法和噬菌体疗法的形式出现。使用局部抗生素治疗形式的粉末和可溶解的抗生素珠已继续扩大,新的应用探索。系统抗生素的使用继续得到优化,新的治疗方案要求静脉注射(PO)而不是静脉注射。总之,尽管不断发展的预防和治疗方式不断出现,骨科感染仍然是临床难题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信