High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: To Measure or Not to Measure?

US cardiology Pub Date : 2025-03-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.15420/usc.2024.25
Adhya Mehta, Roger S Blumenthal, Ty J Gluckman, David I Feldman, Payal Kohli
{"title":"High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: To Measure or Not to Measure?","authors":"Adhya Mehta, Roger S Blumenthal, Ty J Gluckman, David I Feldman, Payal Kohli","doi":"10.15420/usc.2024.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inflammation and dyslipidemia are central to the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). While lipid-lowering therapies are the cornerstone of ASCVD prevention and treatment, there are other emerging targets, including inflammation (which has been dubbed the 'residual inflammatory risk'), that can be addressed after LDL cholesterol thresholds have been reached. Research over the past 20 years has identified C-reactive protein (CRP) as a key marker of inflammation with atherosclerosis. The association of more sensitive measures of CRP (high- sensitivity C-reactive protein [hsCRP]) with ASCVD risk in epidemiological studies has also led to its incorporation as a risk enhancer in primary prevention guidelines and its incorporation into risk stratification tools. While there are no formal recommendations related to measurement of hsCRP in secondary prevention, consideration should be given to an individualized approach that addresses inflammatory risk in those with major adverse cardiovascular events, despite maximal lipid-lowering therapy and well-controlled LDL cholesterol levels. The aim of this review is to discuss the role of inflammation in ASCVD, the use of hsCRP as a tool to assess residual inflammatory risk to target upstream pathways such as glucose intolerance and obesity, and to consider use of additional anti-inflammatory medications for ASCVD risk reduction. The authors provide clinical context around when to measure hsCRP in clinical practice and how to address residual inflammatory risk in ASCVD.</p>","PeriodicalId":93393,"journal":{"name":"US cardiology","volume":"19 ","pages":"e06"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11959579/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"US cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15420/usc.2024.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inflammation and dyslipidemia are central to the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). While lipid-lowering therapies are the cornerstone of ASCVD prevention and treatment, there are other emerging targets, including inflammation (which has been dubbed the 'residual inflammatory risk'), that can be addressed after LDL cholesterol thresholds have been reached. Research over the past 20 years has identified C-reactive protein (CRP) as a key marker of inflammation with atherosclerosis. The association of more sensitive measures of CRP (high- sensitivity C-reactive protein [hsCRP]) with ASCVD risk in epidemiological studies has also led to its incorporation as a risk enhancer in primary prevention guidelines and its incorporation into risk stratification tools. While there are no formal recommendations related to measurement of hsCRP in secondary prevention, consideration should be given to an individualized approach that addresses inflammatory risk in those with major adverse cardiovascular events, despite maximal lipid-lowering therapy and well-controlled LDL cholesterol levels. The aim of this review is to discuss the role of inflammation in ASCVD, the use of hsCRP as a tool to assess residual inflammatory risk to target upstream pathways such as glucose intolerance and obesity, and to consider use of additional anti-inflammatory medications for ASCVD risk reduction. The authors provide clinical context around when to measure hsCRP in clinical practice and how to address residual inflammatory risk in ASCVD.

高敏c反应蛋白在动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病中的应用:测量还是不测量?
炎症和血脂异常是动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)发病机制的核心。虽然降脂疗法是ASCVD预防和治疗的基石,但还有其他新兴目标,包括炎症(被称为“残余炎症风险”),可以在LDL胆固醇达到阈值后解决。过去20年的研究已经确定c反应蛋白(CRP)是动脉粥样硬化炎症的关键标志物。在流行病学研究中,更敏感的CRP(高敏c反应蛋白[hsCRP])测量与ASCVD风险的关联也导致其作为风险增强因子被纳入一级预防指南,并被纳入风险分层工具。虽然在二级预防中没有关于测量hsCRP的正式建议,但应该考虑个体化的方法来解决那些有主要不良心血管事件的患者的炎症风险,尽管有最大的降脂治疗和良好的LDL胆固醇水平控制。本综述的目的是讨论炎症在ASCVD中的作用,使用hsCRP作为评估残余炎症风险的工具来靶向上游途径,如葡萄糖耐受不良和肥胖,并考虑使用额外的抗炎药物来降低ASCVD风险。作者提供了临床实践中何时测量hsCRP以及如何解决ASCVD残留炎症风险的临床背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信