Marie-Hélène Milot, Stephania Palimeris, Yavuz Shahzad, Hélène Corriveau, François Tremblay, Marie-Hélène Boudrias
{"title":"LONG-TERM BENEFITS OF A TAILORED STRENGTH TRAINING INTERVENTION ON ARM FUNCTION IN CHRONIC STROKE SURVIVORS: A FOLLOW-UP STUDY.","authors":"Marie-Hélène Milot, Stephania Palimeris, Yavuz Shahzad, Hélène Corriveau, François Tremblay, Marie-Hélène Boudrias","doi":"10.2340/jrm-cc.v8.42941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We showed that a tailored strengthening intervention based on the size of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the affected arm was effective in improving function in chronic stroke survivors. Here, we investigated whether the short-term gains in arm function were maintained at 1-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Twenty-five participants at the chronic stage of a stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were classified in the light (LI; MEPs 50-120 μV, <i>n</i> = 8) and high (HI; MEPs > 120μV, <i>n</i> = 17) intensity training groups. The strengthening protocol consisted of adjusted exercises for the affected arm (3X/week; 4 weeks). The Fugl-Meyer Stroke Assessment (FMA), Grip strength (GS) and Box and Block test (BBT) were assessed at baseline, post-intervention and at 1-year follow-up. Changes in clinical measures were compared using repeated-measures ANOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant effect of time was noted on all outcome measures [FMA: <i>p</i> < 0.001; BBT: <i>p</i> = 0.05; GS: <i>p</i> < 0.001], but the LI group improved more on the FMA (<i>p</i> = 0.003) and maintained their gains at 1-year follow-up (<i>p</i> = 0.527) than the HI group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The size of MEPs in the affected arm could be a significant factor in influencing responses to strengthening exercises post-stroke and allow gains to be maintained up to 1 year post-intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":73929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications","volume":"8 ","pages":"42941"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11960274/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm-cc.v8.42941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: We showed that a tailored strengthening intervention based on the size of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the affected arm was effective in improving function in chronic stroke survivors. Here, we investigated whether the short-term gains in arm function were maintained at 1-year follow-up.
Subjects: Twenty-five participants at the chronic stage of a stroke.
Methods: Participants were classified in the light (LI; MEPs 50-120 μV, n = 8) and high (HI; MEPs > 120μV, n = 17) intensity training groups. The strengthening protocol consisted of adjusted exercises for the affected arm (3X/week; 4 weeks). The Fugl-Meyer Stroke Assessment (FMA), Grip strength (GS) and Box and Block test (BBT) were assessed at baseline, post-intervention and at 1-year follow-up. Changes in clinical measures were compared using repeated-measures ANOVA.
Results: A significant effect of time was noted on all outcome measures [FMA: p < 0.001; BBT: p = 0.05; GS: p < 0.001], but the LI group improved more on the FMA (p = 0.003) and maintained their gains at 1-year follow-up (p = 0.527) than the HI group.
Conclusion: The size of MEPs in the affected arm could be a significant factor in influencing responses to strengthening exercises post-stroke and allow gains to be maintained up to 1 year post-intervention.
目的:我们发现,基于受影响手臂运动诱发电位(MEPs)大小的量身定制强化干预对改善慢性卒中幸存者的功能是有效的。在这里,我们调查了在1年的随访中,手臂功能的短期改善是否得以维持。研究对象:25名处于中风慢性阶段的参与者。方法:受试者按轻度(LI;MEPs 50-120 μV, n = 8)和high (HI;MEPs bb0 120μV, n = 17)强度训练组。强化方案包括对受影响的手臂进行调整练习(3次/周;4周)。Fugl-Meyer卒中评估(FMA)、握力(GS)和盒块测试(BBT)分别在基线、干预后和1年随访时进行评估。采用重复测量方差分析比较临床测量的变化。结果:时间对所有结局指标均有显著影响[FMA: p < 0.001;BBT: p = 0.05;GS: p < 0.001],但LI组在FMA方面的改善更多(p = 0.003),并在1年随访时保持其收益(p = 0.527)。结论:患臂mep的大小可能是影响卒中后强化训练反应的重要因素,并且可以在干预后维持长达1年的获益。