[Comparison of gemcitabine production costs in individualized and standardized doses].

Mélanie Closset, Louise Lombet, Justine Hubert, Laura Soumoy, Jean-Daniel Hecq, Pascal Odou, Laurence Galanti
{"title":"[Comparison of gemcitabine production costs in individualized and standardized doses].","authors":"Mélanie Closset, Louise Lombet, Justine Hubert, Laura Soumoy, Jean-Daniel Hecq, Pascal Odou, Laurence Galanti","doi":"10.1016/j.bulcan.2025.02.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cancer chemotherapy doses are often adapted to patients' body surface area and produced individually. Alternatively, dose-banding promotes batch production of clinically defined fixed doses, for which a standard deviation of±5% determines a band incorporating individual doses calculated on the basis of body surface area. The aim is to compare the costs of individualized and batch production of gemcitabine in a centralized chemotherapy reconstitution unit.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study was carried out using a cost-minimization analysis. The first step was to identify the percentage of gemcitabine preparations eligible for standardization over a one-year period, and to define the standardized doses of clinical interest, taking into account a standard deviation of±5%. The second step was to compare the direct and indirect costs of individualized production with those of mass production.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of standardizable preparations was evaluated at 69.8%, with standardized doses of 1500mg±5%, 1600mg±5%, 1800mg±5%, 2000mg±5% and 2200mg±5%. Comparison of production costs for a total of 324 bags over one year showed that dose-banding reduced costs by 7%.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The cost difference between individualized production and batch production of standardized doses of gemcitabine bags is in favor of dose-banding. The analysis could be extended to other anticancer molecules.</p>","PeriodicalId":93917,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin du cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin du cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulcan.2025.02.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cancer chemotherapy doses are often adapted to patients' body surface area and produced individually. Alternatively, dose-banding promotes batch production of clinically defined fixed doses, for which a standard deviation of±5% determines a band incorporating individual doses calculated on the basis of body surface area. The aim is to compare the costs of individualized and batch production of gemcitabine in a centralized chemotherapy reconstitution unit.

Method: The study was carried out using a cost-minimization analysis. The first step was to identify the percentage of gemcitabine preparations eligible for standardization over a one-year period, and to define the standardized doses of clinical interest, taking into account a standard deviation of±5%. The second step was to compare the direct and indirect costs of individualized production with those of mass production.

Results: The percentage of standardizable preparations was evaluated at 69.8%, with standardized doses of 1500mg±5%, 1600mg±5%, 1800mg±5%, 2000mg±5% and 2200mg±5%. Comparison of production costs for a total of 324 bags over one year showed that dose-banding reduced costs by 7%.

Discussion: The cost difference between individualized production and batch production of standardized doses of gemcitabine bags is in favor of dose-banding. The analysis could be extended to other anticancer molecules.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信