Mélanie Closset, Louise Lombet, Justine Hubert, Laura Soumoy, Jean-Daniel Hecq, Pascal Odou, Laurence Galanti
{"title":"[Comparison of gemcitabine production costs in individualized and standardized doses].","authors":"Mélanie Closset, Louise Lombet, Justine Hubert, Laura Soumoy, Jean-Daniel Hecq, Pascal Odou, Laurence Galanti","doi":"10.1016/j.bulcan.2025.02.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cancer chemotherapy doses are often adapted to patients' body surface area and produced individually. Alternatively, dose-banding promotes batch production of clinically defined fixed doses, for which a standard deviation of±5% determines a band incorporating individual doses calculated on the basis of body surface area. The aim is to compare the costs of individualized and batch production of gemcitabine in a centralized chemotherapy reconstitution unit.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study was carried out using a cost-minimization analysis. The first step was to identify the percentage of gemcitabine preparations eligible for standardization over a one-year period, and to define the standardized doses of clinical interest, taking into account a standard deviation of±5%. The second step was to compare the direct and indirect costs of individualized production with those of mass production.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of standardizable preparations was evaluated at 69.8%, with standardized doses of 1500mg±5%, 1600mg±5%, 1800mg±5%, 2000mg±5% and 2200mg±5%. Comparison of production costs for a total of 324 bags over one year showed that dose-banding reduced costs by 7%.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The cost difference between individualized production and batch production of standardized doses of gemcitabine bags is in favor of dose-banding. The analysis could be extended to other anticancer molecules.</p>","PeriodicalId":93917,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin du cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin du cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulcan.2025.02.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Cancer chemotherapy doses are often adapted to patients' body surface area and produced individually. Alternatively, dose-banding promotes batch production of clinically defined fixed doses, for which a standard deviation of±5% determines a band incorporating individual doses calculated on the basis of body surface area. The aim is to compare the costs of individualized and batch production of gemcitabine in a centralized chemotherapy reconstitution unit.
Method: The study was carried out using a cost-minimization analysis. The first step was to identify the percentage of gemcitabine preparations eligible for standardization over a one-year period, and to define the standardized doses of clinical interest, taking into account a standard deviation of±5%. The second step was to compare the direct and indirect costs of individualized production with those of mass production.
Results: The percentage of standardizable preparations was evaluated at 69.8%, with standardized doses of 1500mg±5%, 1600mg±5%, 1800mg±5%, 2000mg±5% and 2200mg±5%. Comparison of production costs for a total of 324 bags over one year showed that dose-banding reduced costs by 7%.
Discussion: The cost difference between individualized production and batch production of standardized doses of gemcitabine bags is in favor of dose-banding. The analysis could be extended to other anticancer molecules.