[Point of care coagulation diagnostics-Absolutely necessary or only a reasonable supplement?]

Martin Mirus, Herbert Schöchl, Philipp Groene, Mirjam Bachler, Jürgen Koscielny, Dietmar Fries, Lars Heubner
{"title":"[Point of care coagulation diagnostics-Absolutely necessary or only a reasonable supplement?]","authors":"Martin Mirus, Herbert Schöchl, Philipp Groene, Mirjam Bachler, Jürgen Koscielny, Dietmar Fries, Lars Heubner","doi":"10.1007/s00101-025-01524-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Point of care (POC) coagulation diagnostics have become an integral part of clinical patient care. In particular, the strengths of POC viscoelastometry (VET) lie not only in the rapid availability of test results but also in the fact that VET provides insights into coagulation that cannot be detected by standard laboratory tests. The relevance of POC-VET in the optimal management of patients with acutely acquired bleeding disorders, such as trauma-induced coagulopathy, is now unquestioned and is also reflected in the corresponding guidelines; however, VET also provides important information about fibrinolysis and fibrinolytic activity and in combination with other laboratory values can possibly also be sensitive for prothrombotic coagulation disorders. Therefore, POC-VET is increasingly being used in intensive care medicine. The use of POC diagnostics is not subject to the same standards as central laboratory testing. In order to maintain high quality and avoid harming patients, the requirements for medical device manufacturers in particular have been increased as part of the in vitro diagnostic reagents (IVDR) regulations, which places high demands on quality management in particular. The variety of POC devices and the lack of comparability between them remains an unsolved problem. It should be critically discussed to what extent medical device manufacturers and pharmaceutical companies could be legally required to keep unique and urgently needed technologies on the market, especially if no comparable alternatives will be available in the foreseeable future. Overall, from today's perspective, the use of POC coagulation diagnostics is essential for optimal patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":72805,"journal":{"name":"Die Anaesthesiologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Die Anaesthesiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-025-01524-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Point of care (POC) coagulation diagnostics have become an integral part of clinical patient care. In particular, the strengths of POC viscoelastometry (VET) lie not only in the rapid availability of test results but also in the fact that VET provides insights into coagulation that cannot be detected by standard laboratory tests. The relevance of POC-VET in the optimal management of patients with acutely acquired bleeding disorders, such as trauma-induced coagulopathy, is now unquestioned and is also reflected in the corresponding guidelines; however, VET also provides important information about fibrinolysis and fibrinolytic activity and in combination with other laboratory values can possibly also be sensitive for prothrombotic coagulation disorders. Therefore, POC-VET is increasingly being used in intensive care medicine. The use of POC diagnostics is not subject to the same standards as central laboratory testing. In order to maintain high quality and avoid harming patients, the requirements for medical device manufacturers in particular have been increased as part of the in vitro diagnostic reagents (IVDR) regulations, which places high demands on quality management in particular. The variety of POC devices and the lack of comparability between them remains an unsolved problem. It should be critically discussed to what extent medical device manufacturers and pharmaceutical companies could be legally required to keep unique and urgently needed technologies on the market, especially if no comparable alternatives will be available in the foreseeable future. Overall, from today's perspective, the use of POC coagulation diagnostics is essential for optimal patient care.

护理点(POC)凝血诊断已成为临床病人护理不可或缺的一部分。尤其是,POC 粘弹性测定法(VET)的优势不仅在于能快速获得检测结果,还在于它能深入了解标准实验室检测无法发现的凝血问题。目前,POC-VET 在优化治疗急性出血性疾病(如外伤引起的凝血功能障碍)患者方面的作用已毋庸置疑,这一点也反映在相应的指南中;不过,VET 还能提供有关纤溶和纤溶活性的重要信息,与其他实验室数值相结合,还可能对血栓前凝血功能障碍具有敏感性。因此,重症监护医学中越来越多地使用 POC-VET 技术。POC 诊断技术的使用与中心实验室检测的标准不同。为了保持高质量并避免对患者造成伤害,作为体外诊断试剂(IVDR)法规的一部分,对医疗器械制造商的要求尤其提高,这对质量管理提出了更高的要求。POC 设备种类繁多,它们之间缺乏可比性,这仍是一个尚未解决的问题。应当认真讨论的是,法律在多大程度上要求医疗器械制造商和制药公司在市场上保留独特而急需的技术,尤其是在可预见的未来没有可比替代品的情况下。总之,从今天的角度来看,使用 POC 凝血诊断仪对于优化患者护理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信