Burnout and Back Pain and Their Associations With Homecare Workers' Psychosocial Work Environment-A National Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Tania Martins, Michael Simon, Nathalie Möckli, Carla Meyer-Massetti, Roland Fischer, Christine Serdaly, Franziska Zúñiga
{"title":"Burnout and Back Pain and Their Associations With Homecare Workers' Psychosocial Work Environment-A National Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Tania Martins, Michael Simon, Nathalie Möckli, Carla Meyer-Massetti, Roland Fischer, Christine Serdaly, Franziska Zúñiga","doi":"10.1111/jan.16931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To determine the prevalence of burnout and back pain in homecare workers in Switzerland and assess their associations with psychosocial work environment factors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>National multicentre cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using paper-pencil questionnaires, data were collected from January 2021 to September 2021 from employees of 88 homecare agencies across Switzerland. Respondents who identified themselves as administrators, apprentices, or trainees, who were in leadership positions, or who were not involved in the provision of care or housekeeping were excluded from this analysis. Burnout was assessed with the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory Scale (possible score range 0-100) and back pain with a single item from the Federal Statistical Office's Swiss Health Survey. Multilevel regression analyses were used to assess burnout and back pain's associations with psychosocial work environment factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 2514 homecare workers. More than two-thirds (68.6%) reported back pain in the past 4 weeks. The overall mean burnout score was 36.0 (SD 18.3). Poorer work-life balance, higher perceived workload and verbal aggression from clients were positively associated with both outcomes. Better leadership and social support from colleagues were negatively associated with burnout. Higher role conflict levels correlated with higher burnout levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate that the psychosocial work environment should be considered when designing interventions to reduce the prevalence of burnout and back pain among homecare workers.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and patient care: </strong>The high reported burnout and back pain prevalences among homecare workers highlight an urgent need to design and implement psychosocial work environment-improving interventions. In addition to contributing to homecare employees' long-term attraction and retention, protecting and promoting their health and well-being will likely not only benefit them, but also contribute to patient safety, quality of care and homecare sustainability.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>The study reports the prevalence of burnout and back pain among homecare workers and their associations with psychosocial work environment factors. The results indicate that six psychosocial work environment factors-work-life balance, perceived workload, leadership quality, levels of social support from colleagues, role conflict levels, and verbal aggression from clients-all correlate with burnout and/or back pain in homecare workers. For policy makers, researchers, healthcare managers, and homecare agencies, this study's findings will inform the development of interventions to enhance homecare work environments, leading to improvements both in workers' health and in the quality of their care.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>We have adhered to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting checklist for cross-sectional studies.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>Our stakeholder group included patient representatives, policy makers, researchers, clinicians and representatives of professional associations. Throughout the study, all provided support and input on topics including questionnaire development, result interpretation and the design of strategies to improve response rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16931","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To determine the prevalence of burnout and back pain in homecare workers in Switzerland and assess their associations with psychosocial work environment factors.

Design: National multicentre cross-sectional study.

Methods: Using paper-pencil questionnaires, data were collected from January 2021 to September 2021 from employees of 88 homecare agencies across Switzerland. Respondents who identified themselves as administrators, apprentices, or trainees, who were in leadership positions, or who were not involved in the provision of care or housekeeping were excluded from this analysis. Burnout was assessed with the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory Scale (possible score range 0-100) and back pain with a single item from the Federal Statistical Office's Swiss Health Survey. Multilevel regression analyses were used to assess burnout and back pain's associations with psychosocial work environment factors.

Results: We included 2514 homecare workers. More than two-thirds (68.6%) reported back pain in the past 4 weeks. The overall mean burnout score was 36.0 (SD 18.3). Poorer work-life balance, higher perceived workload and verbal aggression from clients were positively associated with both outcomes. Better leadership and social support from colleagues were negatively associated with burnout. Higher role conflict levels correlated with higher burnout levels.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that the psychosocial work environment should be considered when designing interventions to reduce the prevalence of burnout and back pain among homecare workers.

Implications for the profession and patient care: The high reported burnout and back pain prevalences among homecare workers highlight an urgent need to design and implement psychosocial work environment-improving interventions. In addition to contributing to homecare employees' long-term attraction and retention, protecting and promoting their health and well-being will likely not only benefit them, but also contribute to patient safety, quality of care and homecare sustainability.

Impact: The study reports the prevalence of burnout and back pain among homecare workers and their associations with psychosocial work environment factors. The results indicate that six psychosocial work environment factors-work-life balance, perceived workload, leadership quality, levels of social support from colleagues, role conflict levels, and verbal aggression from clients-all correlate with burnout and/or back pain in homecare workers. For policy makers, researchers, healthcare managers, and homecare agencies, this study's findings will inform the development of interventions to enhance homecare work environments, leading to improvements both in workers' health and in the quality of their care.

Reporting method: We have adhered to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting checklist for cross-sectional studies.

Patient or public contribution: Our stakeholder group included patient representatives, policy makers, researchers, clinicians and representatives of professional associations. Throughout the study, all provided support and input on topics including questionnaire development, result interpretation and the design of strategies to improve response rates.

目的:确定瑞士家庭护理人员职业倦怠和背痛的发生率,并评估其与社会心理工作环境因素的关系:设计:全国多中心横断面研究:方法:在 2021 年 1 月至 2021 年 9 月期间,使用纸笔问卷收集瑞士 88 家家庭护理机构员工的数据。自称是行政人员、学徒或实习生、担任领导职务或不参与提供护理或家政服务的受访者不在分析范围内。工作倦怠采用哥本哈根工作倦怠量表进行评估(评分范围为 0-100),背痛则采用联邦统计局瑞士健康调查中的一个项目进行评估。多层次回归分析用于评估职业倦怠和背痛与社会心理工作环境因素的关系:我们纳入了 2514 名家庭护理工作者。超过三分之二(68.6%)的人表示在过去 4 周内曾出现过背痛。职业倦怠的总体平均得分为 36.0(标准差 18.3)。较差的工作与生活平衡、较高的感知工作量和来自客户的言语攻击与这两种结果均呈正相关。较好的领导力和来自同事的社会支持与职业倦怠呈负相关。较高的角色冲突水平与较高的职业倦怠水平相关:我们的研究结果表明,在设计干预措施以降低家庭护理工作者的职业倦怠和背痛发生率时,应考虑社会心理工作环境:据报道,居家护理工作者的职业倦怠和背痛发生率很高,这突出表明迫切需要设计和实施改善社会心理工作环境的干预措施。除了有助于长期吸引和留住居家护理员工外,保护和促进他们的健康和福祉不仅能使他们受益,还有助于患者安全、护理质量和居家护理的可持续发展:该研究报告了居家护理人员职业倦怠和背痛的发生率及其与社会心理学工作环境因素的关系。研究结果表明,六项社会心理工作环境因素--工作与生活的平衡、感知工作量、领导质量、同事的社会支持水平、角色冲突水平以及来自客户的言语攻击--都与居家护理工作者的职业倦怠和/或背痛相关。对于政策制定者、研究人员、医疗保健管理者和家庭护理机构而言,本研究的结果将为制定干预措施提供参考,以改善家庭护理工作环境,从而提高工作者的健康水平和护理质量:我们遵循了流行病学观察性研究加强报告(STROBE)的横断面研究报告清单:我们的利益相关者群体包括患者代表、政策制定者、研究人员、临床医生和专业协会代表。在整个研究过程中,他们在问卷编制、结果解释和提高应答率策略设计等方面提供了支持和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信