Evaluating Potential Missed Opportunities to Prevent, Treat, or Diagnose Sepsis: A Population-Based Retrospective Study of Insurance Claims.

IF 2.7 Q4 Medicine
Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2025-04-02 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001240
Roger D Struble, Alan T Arakkal, Joseph E Cavanaugh, Philip M Polgreen, Aaron C Miller
{"title":"Evaluating Potential Missed Opportunities to Prevent, Treat, or Diagnose Sepsis: A Population-Based Retrospective Study of Insurance Claims.","authors":"Roger D Struble, Alan T Arakkal, Joseph E Cavanaugh, Philip M Polgreen, Aaron C Miller","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Delays in diagnosing sepsis may increase morbidity and mortality, but the frequency of delays is poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to estimate the frequency and duration of diagnostic delays for sepsis and potential risk factors for delay.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>We conducted a retrospective case-crossover analysis of sepsis cases from 2016 to 2019 using claims from Merative MarketScan. We ascertained the index diagnosis of sepsis and corresponding hospitalization. We analyzed healthcare visits in the 180 days before diagnosis and then compared the observed and expected trends in signs or symptoms of infection, immune or organ dysfunction (e.g., fever, dyspnea) during the 14 days before diagnosis. A bootstrapping approach was used to estimate the frequency and duration of potential diagnostic delays along with possible risk-factors for experiencing a delay.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The number of patients who experienced a potential diagnostic delay, duration of delay, and number of potential missed opportunities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a total of 649,756 cases of sepsis from 2016 to 2019 meeting inclusion criteria. There was an increase in visits with signs or symptoms of infection, immune or organ dysfunction just before the index diagnosis of sepsis. We estimated that around 16.57% (95% CI, 16.38-16.78) of patients experienced a potential diagnostic delay, with a mean delay duration of 3.21 days (95% CI, 3.13-3.27) and a median of 2 days. Most delays occurred in outpatient settings. Potential diagnostic delays were more frequent among younger age groups and patients who received antibiotics (odds ratio [OR] 2.58 [95% CI, 2.54-2.62]), or treatments for particular symptoms, including opioids (OR 1.43 [95% CI, 1.40-1.46]) and inhalers (OR 1.37 [95% CI, 1.33-1.40]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>There may be a substantial number of potential missed opportunities to diagnose sepsis, especially in outpatient settings. Multiple factors might contribute to delays in diagnosing sepsis including commonly prescribed medications for symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 4","pages":"e1240"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11968023/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Delays in diagnosing sepsis may increase morbidity and mortality, but the frequency of delays is poorly understood.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to estimate the frequency and duration of diagnostic delays for sepsis and potential risk factors for delay.

Design, setting, and participants: We conducted a retrospective case-crossover analysis of sepsis cases from 2016 to 2019 using claims from Merative MarketScan. We ascertained the index diagnosis of sepsis and corresponding hospitalization. We analyzed healthcare visits in the 180 days before diagnosis and then compared the observed and expected trends in signs or symptoms of infection, immune or organ dysfunction (e.g., fever, dyspnea) during the 14 days before diagnosis. A bootstrapping approach was used to estimate the frequency and duration of potential diagnostic delays along with possible risk-factors for experiencing a delay.

Main outcomes and measures: The number of patients who experienced a potential diagnostic delay, duration of delay, and number of potential missed opportunities.

Results: We identified a total of 649,756 cases of sepsis from 2016 to 2019 meeting inclusion criteria. There was an increase in visits with signs or symptoms of infection, immune or organ dysfunction just before the index diagnosis of sepsis. We estimated that around 16.57% (95% CI, 16.38-16.78) of patients experienced a potential diagnostic delay, with a mean delay duration of 3.21 days (95% CI, 3.13-3.27) and a median of 2 days. Most delays occurred in outpatient settings. Potential diagnostic delays were more frequent among younger age groups and patients who received antibiotics (odds ratio [OR] 2.58 [95% CI, 2.54-2.62]), or treatments for particular symptoms, including opioids (OR 1.43 [95% CI, 1.40-1.46]) and inhalers (OR 1.37 [95% CI, 1.33-1.40]).

Conclusions and relevance: There may be a substantial number of potential missed opportunities to diagnose sepsis, especially in outpatient settings. Multiple factors might contribute to delays in diagnosing sepsis including commonly prescribed medications for symptoms.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评估可能错过的预防、治疗或诊断败血症的机会:一项基于人群的保险索赔回顾性研究。
重要性:诊断败血症的延迟可能会增加发病率和死亡率,但延迟的频率尚不清楚。目的:本研究的目的是估计脓毒症诊断延迟的频率和持续时间以及延迟的潜在危险因素。设计、环境和参与者:我们使用Merative MarketScan的声明对2016年至2019年的败血症病例进行了回顾性病例交叉分析。我们确定了脓毒症的诊断指标和相应的住院治疗。我们分析了诊断前180天的医疗保健访问,然后比较了在诊断前14天内观察到的和预期的感染、免疫或器官功能障碍(如发烧、呼吸困难)体征或症状的趋势。使用自举方法来估计潜在诊断延迟的频率和持续时间,以及经历延迟的可能风险因素。主要结果和测量:经历潜在诊断延迟的患者数量、延迟持续时间和潜在错失机会的数量。结果:2016年至2019年,我们共发现649,756例符合纳入标准的脓毒症。在脓毒症的指数诊断之前,有感染、免疫或器官功能障碍的体征或症状的就诊人数有所增加。我们估计约16.57% (95% CI, 16.38-16.78)的患者经历了潜在的诊断延迟,平均延迟时间为3.21天(95% CI, 3.13-3.27),中位数为2天。大多数延误发生在门诊。潜在的诊断延迟在年轻年龄组和接受抗生素治疗的患者中更为常见(比值比[OR] 2.58 [95% CI, 2.54-2.62]),或针对特定症状进行治疗,包括阿片类药物(比值比[OR] 1.43 [95% CI, 1.40-1.46])和吸入器(比值比[OR] 1.37 [95% CI, 1.33-1.40])。结论和相关性:可能有大量潜在的错过机会诊断败血症,特别是在门诊设置。多种因素可能导致败血症的诊断延迟,包括针对症状的常用处方药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信