Beomjoon Park, Minhye Kim, Dawoon Jung, Jinwook Kim, Kyung-Ryoul Mun
{"title":"Smart insole-based abnormal gait identification: Deep sequential networks and feature ablation study.","authors":"Beomjoon Park, Minhye Kim, Dawoon Jung, Jinwook Kim, Kyung-Ryoul Mun","doi":"10.1177/20552076251332999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Gait analysis plays a pivotal role in evaluating walking abilities, with recent advancements in digital health stressing the importance of efficient data collection methods. This study aims to classify nine gait types including one normal and eight abnormal gaits, using sequential network-based models and diverse feature combinations obtained from insole sensors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The dataset was collected using insole sensors from subjects performing 15 m walking with designated gait types. The sensors incorporated pressure sensors and inertial measurement units (IMUs), along with the center of pressure engineered from the pressure readings. A number of deep learning architectures were evaluated for their ability to classify the gait types, focusing on feature sets including temporal parameters, statistical features of pressure signals, center of pressure data, and IMU data. Ablation studies were also conducted to assess the impact of combining features from different modalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results demonstrate that models incorporating IMU features outperform those using different combinations of modalities including individual feature sets, with the top-performing models achieving F1-scores of up to 90% in sample-wise classification and 92% in subject-wise classification. Additionally, an ablation study reveals the importance of considering diverse feature modalities, including temporal parameters, statistical features from pressure signals, center of pressure data, and IMU data, for comprehensive gait classification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, this study successfully developed deep sequential models that effectively classify nine different gait types, with the ablation study underscoring the potential for integrating features from diverse domains to enhance clinical applications, such as intervention for gait-related disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":51333,"journal":{"name":"DIGITAL HEALTH","volume":"11 ","pages":"20552076251332999"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11960168/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIGITAL HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251332999","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Gait analysis plays a pivotal role in evaluating walking abilities, with recent advancements in digital health stressing the importance of efficient data collection methods. This study aims to classify nine gait types including one normal and eight abnormal gaits, using sequential network-based models and diverse feature combinations obtained from insole sensors.
Methods: The dataset was collected using insole sensors from subjects performing 15 m walking with designated gait types. The sensors incorporated pressure sensors and inertial measurement units (IMUs), along with the center of pressure engineered from the pressure readings. A number of deep learning architectures were evaluated for their ability to classify the gait types, focusing on feature sets including temporal parameters, statistical features of pressure signals, center of pressure data, and IMU data. Ablation studies were also conducted to assess the impact of combining features from different modalities.
Results: Our results demonstrate that models incorporating IMU features outperform those using different combinations of modalities including individual feature sets, with the top-performing models achieving F1-scores of up to 90% in sample-wise classification and 92% in subject-wise classification. Additionally, an ablation study reveals the importance of considering diverse feature modalities, including temporal parameters, statistical features from pressure signals, center of pressure data, and IMU data, for comprehensive gait classification.
Conclusion: Overall, this study successfully developed deep sequential models that effectively classify nine different gait types, with the ablation study underscoring the potential for integrating features from diverse domains to enhance clinical applications, such as intervention for gait-related disorders.