Impact of connected health on the psychological wellbeing and quality of life of people with multiple sclerosis and their caregivers: A systematic review.
Joan Alaboson, Laura Coffey, Sowmya Shrivastava, Adeola Ade-Alao, Rebecca Maguire
{"title":"Impact of connected health on the psychological wellbeing and quality of life of people with multiple sclerosis and their caregivers: A systematic review.","authors":"Joan Alaboson, Laura Coffey, Sowmya Shrivastava, Adeola Ade-Alao, Rebecca Maguire","doi":"10.1177/20552076251326230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Connected health (CH) interventions may improve psychological wellbeing and quality of life (QoL) in caregivers and people with multiple sclerosis (MS); however, this impact has not been rigorously evaluated. This systematic review aims to synthesize the literature assessing CH technology's impact on psychological wellbeing and/or QoL of people with MS (PwMS) and/or their caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review's protocol is registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with identification number CRD42023402434. CINAHL, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO databases were searched with terms relating to (a) CH; (b) MS; (c) psychological wellbeing/QoL; and (d) caregivers/people with MS. Of 2821 screened articles, 47 met the eligibility criteria, with just three including MS caregivers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Heterogenous interventions supporting self-management (<i>n</i> = 20 studies), education (<i>n</i> = 17 studies), psychological (<i>n</i> = 14 studies) or physical (<i>n</i> = 9 studies) rehabilitation and peer support (<i>n</i> = 5 studies) were found. CH technologies had mixed effectiveness in improving psychological and QoL outcomes, with results potentially impacted by technology type, intervention and target group. The study's findings have limited generalizability to improve access across sub-national locations, with no studies disaggregating between urban and rural residence and the majority conducted in the USA and Western Europe.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CH technologies show promise in improving psychological wellbeing and QoL among PwMS and their caregivers. However, this necessitates further study comparing connected health and MS subtypes to improve reproducibility and effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":51333,"journal":{"name":"DIGITAL HEALTH","volume":"11 ","pages":"20552076251326230"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11960181/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIGITAL HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251326230","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Connected health (CH) interventions may improve psychological wellbeing and quality of life (QoL) in caregivers and people with multiple sclerosis (MS); however, this impact has not been rigorously evaluated. This systematic review aims to synthesize the literature assessing CH technology's impact on psychological wellbeing and/or QoL of people with MS (PwMS) and/or their caregivers.
Methods: This systematic review's protocol is registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with identification number CRD42023402434. CINAHL, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO databases were searched with terms relating to (a) CH; (b) MS; (c) psychological wellbeing/QoL; and (d) caregivers/people with MS. Of 2821 screened articles, 47 met the eligibility criteria, with just three including MS caregivers.
Results: Heterogenous interventions supporting self-management (n = 20 studies), education (n = 17 studies), psychological (n = 14 studies) or physical (n = 9 studies) rehabilitation and peer support (n = 5 studies) were found. CH technologies had mixed effectiveness in improving psychological and QoL outcomes, with results potentially impacted by technology type, intervention and target group. The study's findings have limited generalizability to improve access across sub-national locations, with no studies disaggregating between urban and rural residence and the majority conducted in the USA and Western Europe.
Conclusion: CH technologies show promise in improving psychological wellbeing and QoL among PwMS and their caregivers. However, this necessitates further study comparing connected health and MS subtypes to improve reproducibility and effectiveness.