Block or No-Block? Regional Anesthesia and Return-to-Sport Outcomes in Quadriceps Tendon Autograft ACL Reconstruction.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Journal of Knee Surgery Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2542-2526
Seth M Borchard, Richard J VanTienderen, Nicholas J Pitcher, Elle M McCormick, Robert W Westermann
{"title":"Block or No-Block? Regional Anesthesia and Return-to-Sport Outcomes in Quadriceps Tendon Autograft ACL Reconstruction.","authors":"Seth M Borchard, Richard J VanTienderen, Nicholas J Pitcher, Elle M McCormick, Robert W Westermann","doi":"10.1055/a-2542-2526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This research aimed to compare return-to-sport (RTS) muscle strength testing in athletes 6 months following a quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction performed with or without a nerve block. Retrospective analysis of RTS strength testing in competitive or recreational athletes who had a QT ACL reconstruction at a Midwest academic referral center. There were 182 participants ranging from 12 to 29 years of age with a mean age of 16.9 years old. Patients were stratified into two groups based on whether they received an intraoperative nerve (adductor canal) block. Relevant tests performed during RTS testing included isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring strength (ISOK) in addition to limb symmetry and self-reported psychological readiness. Most patients underwent multiple RTS tests; for this study, we used the data from their initial test typically performed in the 6-month postoperative timeframe. Forty-three patients had an intraoperative nerve block, while 139 did not have a block. There were no observed statistically significant differences in quadriceps or hamstring strength when comparing the median scores of the nerve block and no-block groups across the major quantitative categories of isokinetic muscle strength, limb symmetry, tuck jump errors, or psychological readiness to return to sport. There was evidence of a relationship between increased graft thickness and decreased isokinetic quadriceps strength at both 60 and 300 deg/s in addition to lower self-reported confidence in readiness to RTS. No significant differences in functional strength testing or psychological readiness at 6 months were seen in ACL reconstruction involving QT grafts based on block status. There was evidence of a relationship between increased QT autograft thickness and decreased functional outcomes at 6 months. This research strengthens the case for leveraging an adductor canal block in QT ACL reconstruction involving young athletes as an effective tool for pain management without compromising muscle strength or RTS readiness. The level of evidence is III.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"457-462"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Knee Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2542-2526","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aimed to compare return-to-sport (RTS) muscle strength testing in athletes 6 months following a quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction performed with or without a nerve block. Retrospective analysis of RTS strength testing in competitive or recreational athletes who had a QT ACL reconstruction at a Midwest academic referral center. There were 182 participants ranging from 12 to 29 years of age with a mean age of 16.9 years old. Patients were stratified into two groups based on whether they received an intraoperative nerve (adductor canal) block. Relevant tests performed during RTS testing included isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring strength (ISOK) in addition to limb symmetry and self-reported psychological readiness. Most patients underwent multiple RTS tests; for this study, we used the data from their initial test typically performed in the 6-month postoperative timeframe. Forty-three patients had an intraoperative nerve block, while 139 did not have a block. There were no observed statistically significant differences in quadriceps or hamstring strength when comparing the median scores of the nerve block and no-block groups across the major quantitative categories of isokinetic muscle strength, limb symmetry, tuck jump errors, or psychological readiness to return to sport. There was evidence of a relationship between increased graft thickness and decreased isokinetic quadriceps strength at both 60 and 300 deg/s in addition to lower self-reported confidence in readiness to RTS. No significant differences in functional strength testing or psychological readiness at 6 months were seen in ACL reconstruction involving QT grafts based on block status. There was evidence of a relationship between increased QT autograft thickness and decreased functional outcomes at 6 months. This research strengthens the case for leveraging an adductor canal block in QT ACL reconstruction involving young athletes as an effective tool for pain management without compromising muscle strength or RTS readiness. The level of evidence is III.

阻止还是不阻止?自体股四头肌腱前交叉韧带重建的区域麻醉和恢复运动效果。
本研究旨在比较接受或不接受神经阻滞的四头肌肌腱(QT)自体前交叉韧带(ACL)重建6个月后运动员的恢复运动(RTS)肌力测试。在中西部学术转诊中心进行QT前交叉韧带重建的竞技或休闲运动员RTS力量测试的回顾性分析。共有182名参与者,年龄从12岁到29岁不等,平均年龄为16.9岁。根据患者是否接受术中神经(内收管)阻滞,将患者分为两组。在RTS测试中进行的相关测试包括等速股四头肌和腘绳肌力量(ISOK),以及肢体对称性和自我报告的心理准备。大多数患者进行了多次RTS测试;在这项研究中,我们使用了他们通常在术后6个月进行的初始测试的数据。43例患者术中神经阻滞,139例未行神经阻滞。当比较神经阻滞组和非神经阻滞组在等速肌肉力量、肢体对称性、跳跃误差或重返运动的心理准备等主要定量类别上的中位数得分时,在股四头肌或腿筋力量方面没有观察到统计学上的显著差异。有证据表明,在60和300度/秒时,移植物厚度增加与等速股四头肌力量下降之间存在关系,此外,自我报告的RTS准备信心也较低。基于阻塞状态的QT移植ACL重建,6个月时的功能强度测试和心理准备没有显著差异。有证据表明,QT自体移植物厚度增加与6个月时功能结果下降之间存在关系。这项研究加强了在年轻运动员QT前交叉韧带重建中利用内收管阻滞作为疼痛管理的有效工具的案例,而不影响肌肉力量或RTS准备。证据等级为三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: The Journal of Knee Surgery covers a range of issues relating to the orthopaedic techniques of arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and reconstructive surgery of the knee joint. In addition to original peer-review articles, this periodical provides details on emerging surgical techniques, as well as reviews and special focus sections. Topics of interest include cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction, bone grafting, cartilage regeneration, and magnetic resonance imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信