The untapped potential for healthcare to support recovery for patients with stress-related exhaustion disorder - creating an experience of generalised safety.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Susanne Ellbin, Agneta Lindegård, Fredrik Bååthe
{"title":"The untapped potential for healthcare to support recovery for patients with stress-related exhaustion disorder - creating an experience of generalised safety.","authors":"Susanne Ellbin, Agneta Lindegård, Fredrik Bååthe","doi":"10.1080/02813432.2025.2480869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exhaustion disorder (ED) is one of the most rapidly increasing causes of sick leave in Sweden. The prolonged recovery time from ED creates a dilemma on both the societal and individual level. How patients experience the encounter with health care is critical for the recovery from ED. The aim of this study was to explore how patients with ED experience the encounter with health care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data from 23 semi‑structured interviews with ED patients were analysed using content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One of the main findings was that patients want to be listened to and taken seriously in the encounter with health care. However, patients experience that healthcare struggles to meet these expectations. Several informants reported not being listened to, worrying symptoms were overlooked, an individualised care plan was lacking, and patients experienced that they were prematurely dismissed. This created an experience of unsafety, and that could inadvertently maintain the stress response and negatively influence recovery for patients with stress‑related disorders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is paramount to convey an experience of predictability, despite the fact that patients undergo an unpredictable process related to their ED illness. By combining the traditional load‑recovery theory with the generalised unsafety theory of stress, we can tap into the potential to enhance recovery for patients with ED. We suggest that if the encounter with healthcare provides an experience of generalised safety, the conditions for patients with stress‑related disorders to recover would be distinctly enhanced.</p>","PeriodicalId":21521,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2025.2480869","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Exhaustion disorder (ED) is one of the most rapidly increasing causes of sick leave in Sweden. The prolonged recovery time from ED creates a dilemma on both the societal and individual level. How patients experience the encounter with health care is critical for the recovery from ED. The aim of this study was to explore how patients with ED experience the encounter with health care.

Method: Data from 23 semi‑structured interviews with ED patients were analysed using content analysis.

Results: One of the main findings was that patients want to be listened to and taken seriously in the encounter with health care. However, patients experience that healthcare struggles to meet these expectations. Several informants reported not being listened to, worrying symptoms were overlooked, an individualised care plan was lacking, and patients experienced that they were prematurely dismissed. This created an experience of unsafety, and that could inadvertently maintain the stress response and negatively influence recovery for patients with stress‑related disorders.

Conclusion: It is paramount to convey an experience of predictability, despite the fact that patients undergo an unpredictable process related to their ED illness. By combining the traditional load‑recovery theory with the generalised unsafety theory of stress, we can tap into the potential to enhance recovery for patients with ED. We suggest that if the encounter with healthcare provides an experience of generalised safety, the conditions for patients with stress‑related disorders to recover would be distinctly enhanced.

未开发的潜力,医疗保健,以支持恢复患者与压力相关的疲惫障碍-创造一个普遍的安全体验。
背景:疲劳障碍(ED)是瑞典病假增长最快的原因之一。ED的长期恢复时间在社会和个人层面上都造成了一个困境。患者如何体验医疗护理对ED的康复至关重要。本研究的目的是探讨ED患者如何体验医疗护理。方法:采用内容分析法对23例ED患者的半结构化访谈数据进行分析。结果:其中一个主要发现是患者希望在遇到卫生保健时被倾听和认真对待。然而,患者的经验是,医疗保健努力满足这些期望。几名举报人报告说,没有听取他们的意见,令人担忧的症状被忽视,缺乏个性化的护理计划,病人经历过过早地被解雇。这造成了一种不安全的体验,这可能会在不经意间维持压力反应,并对患有压力相关疾病的患者的康复产生负面影响。结论:传达一种可预测性的体验是至关重要的,尽管事实上患者经历了与他们的ED疾病相关的不可预测的过程。通过将传统的负荷恢复理论与压力的广义不安全理论相结合,我们可以挖掘增强ED患者康复的潜力。我们建议,如果与医疗保健的接触提供了一种广义安全的体验,那么压力相关疾病患者的康复条件将明显改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
19.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is an international online open access journal publishing articles with relevance to general practice and primary health care. Focusing on the continuous professional development in family medicine the journal addresses clinical, epidemiological and humanistic topics in relation to the daily clinical practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is owned by the members of the National Colleges of General Practice in the five Nordic countries through the Nordic Federation of General Practice (NFGP). The journal includes original research on topics related to general practice and family medicine, and publishes both quantitative and qualitative original research, editorials, discussion and analysis papers and reviews to facilitate continuing professional development in family medicine. The journal''s topics range broadly and include: • Clinical family medicine • Epidemiological research • Qualitative research • Health services research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信