Systematic structural discrepancy assessment for computer models.

IF 4.3 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Michael Goldstein, Ian Vernon, Jonathan A Cumming
{"title":"Systematic structural discrepancy assessment for computer models.","authors":"Michael Goldstein, Ian Vernon, Jonathan A Cumming","doi":"10.1098/rsta.2024.0214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Model or structural discrepancy is an essential component in the analysis of computer simulators, representing the differences between the outputs of the simulator and the real-world system that the simulator seeks to represent. This discrepancy can arise from various sources such as simplifications of the model science in the simulator, choices made in our particular implementation of that science, and epistemic uncertainties such as the absence of features or science that we did not know to include or have yet to discover. In this paper, we define and distinguish two types of discrepancy: internal discrepancy that can be assessed by experiments on the simulator itself; and external discrepancy which lies outside the scope of such experiments. We present a tractable methodology and workflow for the assessment of structural discrepancy on the basis of collections of experiments applied to the computer model and illustrate our approach in the context of a simple biological model.This article is part of the theme issue 'Uncertainty quantification for healthcare and biological systems (Part 2)' .</p>","PeriodicalId":19879,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences","volume":"383 2293","pages":"20240214"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2024.0214","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Model or structural discrepancy is an essential component in the analysis of computer simulators, representing the differences between the outputs of the simulator and the real-world system that the simulator seeks to represent. This discrepancy can arise from various sources such as simplifications of the model science in the simulator, choices made in our particular implementation of that science, and epistemic uncertainties such as the absence of features or science that we did not know to include or have yet to discover. In this paper, we define and distinguish two types of discrepancy: internal discrepancy that can be assessed by experiments on the simulator itself; and external discrepancy which lies outside the scope of such experiments. We present a tractable methodology and workflow for the assessment of structural discrepancy on the basis of collections of experiments applied to the computer model and illustrate our approach in the context of a simple biological model.This article is part of the theme issue 'Uncertainty quantification for healthcare and biological systems (Part 2)' .

计算机模型的系统结构差异评估。
模型或结构差异是计算机模拟器分析的重要组成部分,代表模拟器的输出结果与模拟器所要代表的真实世界系统之间的差异。产生这种差异的原因有很多,例如模拟器中对模型科学的简化、我们对该科学的特定实现所做的选择,以及认识上的不确定性,例如缺乏我们不知道要包括或尚未发现的特征或科学。在本文中,我们定义并区分了两类差异:可通过模拟器本身的实验进行评估的内部差异;以及此类实验范围之外的外部差异。我们在计算机模型实验集合的基础上,提出了评估结构差异的可行方法和工作流程,并以一个简单的生物模型为例说明了我们的方法。本文是主题 "医疗保健和生物系统的不确定性量化(第二部分)"的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Continuing its long history of influential scientific publishing, Philosophical Transactions A publishes high-quality theme issues on topics of current importance and general interest within the physical, mathematical and engineering sciences, guest-edited by leading authorities and comprising new research, reviews and opinions from prominent researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信