AI differentiates radionecrosis from true progression in brain metastasis upon stereotactic radiosurgery: analysis of 124 histologically assessed lesions.

IF 16.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Gaia Ressa, Riccardo Levi, Giovanni Savini, Luca Raspagliesi, Elena Clerici, Luisa Bellu, Luca A Cappellini, Marco Grimaldi, Saverio Pancetti, Beatrice Bono, Andrea Franzini, Marco Riva, Bethania Fernandez, Maximilian Niyazi, Federico Pessina, Giuseppe Minniti, Pierina Navarria, Marta Scorsetti, Letterio S Politi
{"title":"AI differentiates radionecrosis from true progression in brain metastasis upon stereotactic radiosurgery: analysis of 124 histologically assessed lesions.","authors":"Gaia Ressa, Riccardo Levi, Giovanni Savini, Luca Raspagliesi, Elena Clerici, Luisa Bellu, Luca A Cappellini, Marco Grimaldi, Saverio Pancetti, Beatrice Bono, Andrea Franzini, Marco Riva, Bethania Fernandez, Maximilian Niyazi, Federico Pessina, Giuseppe Minniti, Pierina Navarria, Marta Scorsetti, Letterio S Politi","doi":"10.1093/neuonc/noaf090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Differentiating radionecrosis from neoplastic progression after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases is a diagnostic challenge. Previous studies have often been limited by datasets lacking histologically confirmed diagnoses. This study aimed to develop automated models for distinguishing radionecrosis from disease progression on brain MRI, utilizing cases with definitive histopathological confirmation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multi-center retrospective study included patients who underwent surgical resection for suspected brain metastasis progression after SRS. Presurgical FLAIR and post-contrast T1 (T1w-ce) were segmented using a convolutional neural network (CNN) and compared with manual segmentation by means of Dice score. Radiomics features were extracted from each lesion, and a Random Forest model was trained on 70% of the internal dataset and evaluated on the remaining 30% and the complete external dataset. A 3DResNet-CNN was trained on the same split dataset. Validation was performed on the external dataset. Post-surgical histology was available for all cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>124 brain metastases were included (104 from center 1 and 20 from center 2). Sole radionecrosis was histologically detected in 34 cases (27.4%).In the internal dataset, univariate and multivariate analysis identified 131 significantly different radiomics features, including GLDM_DNUN and GLDM_SDE within the enhancing area on the T1w-ce. On the external test dataset, the Random Forest model and the 3DResNet-CNN yielded accurate results in terms of accuracy (80.0%, 85.0%), AUROC (0.830, 0.893) and sensitivity (92.8%, 100%) in radionecrosis prediction, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Artificial intelligence could be employed to differentiate between radionecrosis and brain metastasis progression upon SRS, potentially reducing unnecessary surgical interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19377,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf090","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Differentiating radionecrosis from neoplastic progression after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases is a diagnostic challenge. Previous studies have often been limited by datasets lacking histologically confirmed diagnoses. This study aimed to develop automated models for distinguishing radionecrosis from disease progression on brain MRI, utilizing cases with definitive histopathological confirmation.

Methods: This multi-center retrospective study included patients who underwent surgical resection for suspected brain metastasis progression after SRS. Presurgical FLAIR and post-contrast T1 (T1w-ce) were segmented using a convolutional neural network (CNN) and compared with manual segmentation by means of Dice score. Radiomics features were extracted from each lesion, and a Random Forest model was trained on 70% of the internal dataset and evaluated on the remaining 30% and the complete external dataset. A 3DResNet-CNN was trained on the same split dataset. Validation was performed on the external dataset. Post-surgical histology was available for all cases.

Results: 124 brain metastases were included (104 from center 1 and 20 from center 2). Sole radionecrosis was histologically detected in 34 cases (27.4%).In the internal dataset, univariate and multivariate analysis identified 131 significantly different radiomics features, including GLDM_DNUN and GLDM_SDE within the enhancing area on the T1w-ce. On the external test dataset, the Random Forest model and the 3DResNet-CNN yielded accurate results in terms of accuracy (80.0%, 85.0%), AUROC (0.830, 0.893) and sensitivity (92.8%, 100%) in radionecrosis prediction, respectively.

Conclusion: Artificial intelligence could be employed to differentiate between radionecrosis and brain metastasis progression upon SRS, potentially reducing unnecessary surgical interventions.

人工智能在立体定向放射手术中区分放射性坏死与脑转移的真正进展:124个组织学评估病变的分析。
背景:在立体定向放射手术(SRS)治疗脑转移后,区分放射性坏死和肿瘤进展是一个诊断挑战。以往的研究常常受到缺乏组织学确诊的数据集的限制。本研究旨在利用具有明确组织病理学证实的病例,开发在脑MRI上区分放射性坏死与疾病进展的自动模型。方法:这项多中心回顾性研究纳入了SRS术后因怀疑脑转移进展而行手术切除的患者。采用卷积神经网络(CNN)对术前FLAIR和对比后T1 (T1w-ce)进行分割,并通过Dice评分与人工分割进行比较。从每个病灶中提取放射组学特征,在70%的内部数据集上训练随机森林模型,并在剩余的30%和完整的外部数据集上进行评估。3DResNet-CNN在相同的分割数据集上进行训练。在外部数据集上执行验证。所有病例均有术后组织学检查。结果:124例脑转移灶(1中心104例,2中心20例),组织学检出单纯放射性坏死34例(27.4%)。在内部数据集中,单变量和多变量分析确定了131个显著不同的放射组学特征,包括T1w-ce增强区域内的GLDM_DNUN和GLDM_SDE。在外部测试数据集上,随机森林模型和3DResNet-CNN预测放射性坏死的准确率(80.0%,85.0%)、AUROC(0.830, 0.893)和灵敏度(92.8%,100%)均取得了较好的结果。结论:人工智能可用于区分放射性坏死和脑转移进展,可能减少不必要的手术干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuro-oncology
Neuro-oncology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
27.20
自引率
6.30%
发文量
1434
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuro-Oncology, the official journal of the Society for Neuro-Oncology, has been published monthly since January 2010. Affiliated with the Japan Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology, it is a global leader in the field. The journal is committed to swiftly disseminating high-quality information across all areas of neuro-oncology. It features peer-reviewed articles, reviews, symposia on various topics, abstracts from annual meetings, and updates from neuro-oncology societies worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信