Effect of Remnant Continuity on Postoperative Outcomes After Remnant Tensioning Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Respect to Clinical, Radiological, and Second-Look Arthroscopic Criteria.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-31 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671251324218
Sung-Sahn Lee, Young Jin Choi, Juyong Oh, Dong Jin Ryu, Joon Ho Wang
{"title":"Effect of Remnant Continuity on Postoperative Outcomes After Remnant Tensioning Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Respect to Clinical, Radiological, and Second-Look Arthroscopic Criteria.","authors":"Sung-Sahn Lee, Young Jin Choi, Juyong Oh, Dong Jin Ryu, Joon Ho Wang","doi":"10.1177/23259671251324218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remnant tensioning (RT) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been reported to have excellent postoperative outcomes for femoral-side tears. However, the influence of remnant continuity (RC) on the postoperative results after RT ACL reconstruction remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the effects of RC on the postoperative clinical, radiological, and second-look arthroscopic outcomes after RT ACL reconstruction for femoral-side ACL tears.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 94 patients who underwent RT ACL reconstruction using the hamstring tendon for femoral-side ACL tears between 2015 and 2020. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the continuity of the remnant tissue: RC (n = 50) and remnant discontinuity (RD) (n = 44). Stability tests, including the Lachman and pivot-shift tests, side-to-side difference on Telos stress radiographs and KT-2000 arthrometer, patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs), and graft status on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and second-look arthroscopy were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results of all stability tests and PROMs significantly improved postoperatively. The mean follow-up periods were 35.3 and 36.8 months in the RC and RD group, respectively. The 2 groups showed no statistically significant differences in stability outcomes or PROMs. Furthermore, the RC and RD groups showed comparable postoperative graft status on postoperative MRI and second-look arthroscopy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RT ACL reconstruction for RD between the femoral insertion site and ACL tissue showed comparable postoperative outcomes, including stability test, PROMs, postoperative MRI, and second-look arthroscopic data, to surgery for RC in femoral-side tears.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"13 3","pages":"23259671251324218"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11960166/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671251324218","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Remnant tensioning (RT) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been reported to have excellent postoperative outcomes for femoral-side tears. However, the influence of remnant continuity (RC) on the postoperative results after RT ACL reconstruction remains unclear.

Purpose: To investigate the effects of RC on the postoperative clinical, radiological, and second-look arthroscopic outcomes after RT ACL reconstruction for femoral-side ACL tears.

Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: This study included 94 patients who underwent RT ACL reconstruction using the hamstring tendon for femoral-side ACL tears between 2015 and 2020. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the continuity of the remnant tissue: RC (n = 50) and remnant discontinuity (RD) (n = 44). Stability tests, including the Lachman and pivot-shift tests, side-to-side difference on Telos stress radiographs and KT-2000 arthrometer, patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs), and graft status on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and second-look arthroscopy were evaluated.

Results: Results of all stability tests and PROMs significantly improved postoperatively. The mean follow-up periods were 35.3 and 36.8 months in the RC and RD group, respectively. The 2 groups showed no statistically significant differences in stability outcomes or PROMs. Furthermore, the RC and RD groups showed comparable postoperative graft status on postoperative MRI and second-look arthroscopy.

Conclusion: RT ACL reconstruction for RD between the femoral insertion site and ACL tissue showed comparable postoperative outcomes, including stability test, PROMs, postoperative MRI, and second-look arthroscopic data, to surgery for RC in femoral-side tears.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信