Nina Schmid, David Fernandes Del Pozo, Willem Waegeman, Jan Hasenauer
{"title":"Assessment of uncertainty quantification in universal differential equations.","authors":"Nina Schmid, David Fernandes Del Pozo, Willem Waegeman, Jan Hasenauer","doi":"10.1098/rsta.2024.0444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scientific machine learning is a new class of approaches that integrate physical knowledge and mechanistic models with data-driven techniques to uncover the governing equations of complex processes. Among the available approaches, universal differential equations (UDEs) combine prior knowledge in the form of mechanistic formulations with universal function approximators, such as neural networks. Integral to the efficacy of UDEs is the joint estimation of parameters for both the mechanistic formulations and the universal function approximators using empirical data. However, the robustness and applicability of these resultant models hinge upon the rigorous quantification of uncertainties associated with their parameters and predictive capabilities. In this work, we provide a formalization of uncertainty quantification (UQ) for UDEs and investigate key frequentist and Bayesian methods. By analyzing three synthetic examples of varying complexity, we evaluate the validity and efficiency of ensembles, variational inference and Markov-chain Monte Carlo sampling as epistemic UQ methods for UDEs.This article is part of the theme issue 'Uncertainty quantification for healthcare and biological systems (Part 2)'.</p>","PeriodicalId":19879,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences","volume":"383 2293","pages":"20240444"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2024.0444","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Scientific machine learning is a new class of approaches that integrate physical knowledge and mechanistic models with data-driven techniques to uncover the governing equations of complex processes. Among the available approaches, universal differential equations (UDEs) combine prior knowledge in the form of mechanistic formulations with universal function approximators, such as neural networks. Integral to the efficacy of UDEs is the joint estimation of parameters for both the mechanistic formulations and the universal function approximators using empirical data. However, the robustness and applicability of these resultant models hinge upon the rigorous quantification of uncertainties associated with their parameters and predictive capabilities. In this work, we provide a formalization of uncertainty quantification (UQ) for UDEs and investigate key frequentist and Bayesian methods. By analyzing three synthetic examples of varying complexity, we evaluate the validity and efficiency of ensembles, variational inference and Markov-chain Monte Carlo sampling as epistemic UQ methods for UDEs.This article is part of the theme issue 'Uncertainty quantification for healthcare and biological systems (Part 2)'.
期刊介绍:
Continuing its long history of influential scientific publishing, Philosophical Transactions A publishes high-quality theme issues on topics of current importance and general interest within the physical, mathematical and engineering sciences, guest-edited by leading authorities and comprising new research, reviews and opinions from prominent researchers.