Benchmarking deep learning for automated peak detection on GIWAXS data.

IF 6.1 3区 材料科学 Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Journal of Applied Crystallography Pub Date : 2025-02-28 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1107/S1600576725000974
Constantin Völter, Vladimir Starostin, Dmitry Lapkin, Valentin Munteanu, Mikhail Romodin, Maik Hylinski, Alexander Gerlach, Alexander Hinderhofer, Frank Schreiber
{"title":"Benchmarking deep learning for automated peak detection on GIWAXS data.","authors":"Constantin Völter, Vladimir Starostin, Dmitry Lapkin, Valentin Munteanu, Mikhail Romodin, Maik Hylinski, Alexander Gerlach, Alexander Hinderhofer, Frank Schreiber","doi":"10.1107/S1600576725000974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent advancements in X-ray sources and detectors have dramatically increased data generation, leading to a greater demand for automated data processing. This is particularly relevant for real-time grazing-incidence wide-angle X-ray scattering (GIWAXS) experiments which can produce hundreds of thousands of diffraction images in a single day at a synchrotron beamline. Deep learning (DL)-based peak-detection techniques are becoming prominent in this field, but rigorous benchmarking is essential to evaluate their reliability, identify potential problems, explore avenues for improvement and build confidence among researchers for seamless integration into their workflows. However, the systematic evaluation of these techniques has been hampered by the lack of annotated GIWAXS datasets, standardized metrics and baseline models. To address these challenges, we introduce a comprehensive framework comprising an annotated experimental dataset, physics-informed metrics adapted to the GIWAXS geometry and a competitive baseline - a classical, non-DL peak-detection algorithm optimized on our dataset. Furthermore, we apply our framework to benchmark a recent DL solution trained on simulated data and discover its superior performance compared with our baseline. This analysis not only highlights the effectiveness of DL methods for identifying diffraction peaks but also provides insights for further development of these solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14950,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Crystallography","volume":"58 Pt 2","pages":"513-522"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11957406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Crystallography","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576725000974","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent advancements in X-ray sources and detectors have dramatically increased data generation, leading to a greater demand for automated data processing. This is particularly relevant for real-time grazing-incidence wide-angle X-ray scattering (GIWAXS) experiments which can produce hundreds of thousands of diffraction images in a single day at a synchrotron beamline. Deep learning (DL)-based peak-detection techniques are becoming prominent in this field, but rigorous benchmarking is essential to evaluate their reliability, identify potential problems, explore avenues for improvement and build confidence among researchers for seamless integration into their workflows. However, the systematic evaluation of these techniques has been hampered by the lack of annotated GIWAXS datasets, standardized metrics and baseline models. To address these challenges, we introduce a comprehensive framework comprising an annotated experimental dataset, physics-informed metrics adapted to the GIWAXS geometry and a competitive baseline - a classical, non-DL peak-detection algorithm optimized on our dataset. Furthermore, we apply our framework to benchmark a recent DL solution trained on simulated data and discover its superior performance compared with our baseline. This analysis not only highlights the effectiveness of DL methods for identifying diffraction peaks but also provides insights for further development of these solutions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
178
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Many research topics in condensed matter research, materials science and the life sciences make use of crystallographic methods to study crystalline and non-crystalline matter with neutrons, X-rays and electrons. Articles published in the Journal of Applied Crystallography focus on these methods and their use in identifying structural and diffusion-controlled phase transformations, structure-property relationships, structural changes of defects, interfaces and surfaces, etc. Developments of instrumentation and crystallographic apparatus, theory and interpretation, numerical analysis and other related subjects are also covered. The journal is the primary place where crystallographic computer program information is published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信