Real-World Impact of Steerable Sheaths for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation: The INSIGHT Study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yasuo Okumura, Tsunesuke Kono, Akira Mizukami, Osamu Inaba, Yuji Wakamatsu, Daisuke Yamagishi, Satoshi Nakamura, Takumi Arashiro, Akira Sato, Yi Wang, Atsushi Kobori
{"title":"Real-World Impact of Steerable Sheaths for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation: The INSIGHT Study.","authors":"Yasuo Okumura, Tsunesuke Kono, Akira Mizukami, Osamu Inaba, Yuji Wakamatsu, Daisuke Yamagishi, Satoshi Nakamura, Takumi Arashiro, Akira Sato, Yi Wang, Atsushi Kobori","doi":"10.1111/jce.16658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures, the CARTO VIZIGO Bidirectional Guiding Sheath has previously shown promising results in reducing fluoroscopy times without compromising clinical effectiveness or safety compared with non-steerable sheaths.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This non-randomized, multicenter, retrospective cohort study (INSIGHT) aimed to determine the real-world impact of the VIZIGO sheath on procedural efficiency, clinical effectiveness, and safety in paroxysmal AF (PAF) catheter ablation. Consecutive adults who underwent de novo radiofrequency (RF) ablation for PAF with a non-VIZIGO sheath (January 2019-July 2021) or VIZIGO sheath (January 2020-July 2021) were included. Procedural characteristics, primary adverse events (PAEs), and 12-month effectiveness (freedom from repeat ablation or recurrent atrial arrhythmia) were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 199 patients included (mean age, 69.7 years; 59.3% male), 97 had ablation with a VIZIGO sheath and 102 with a non-VIZIGO sheath. Significantly shorter mean times were achieved in the VIZIGO vs. non-VIZIGO group for time to left PVI (18.1 ± 7.5 vs. 19.9 ± 5.6 min, p = 0.046), right PVI (16.5 ± 6.1 vs. 23.1 ± 9.9 min, p < 0.001), total PVI (34.6 ± 9.7 vs. 42.9 ± 11.4 min, p = 0.002), and fluoroscopy time (7.3 ± 10.4 vs. 18.3 ± 13.3 min, p < 0.001). Mean fluoroscopy dose was significantly lower (45.9 ± 112.0 vs. 139.5 ± 251.5 mGy, p < 0.001) with VIZIGO vs. non-VIZIGO sheaths. Catheter stability was comparable between groups. PAE rates were similar in the VIZIGO (3.1%) and non-VIZIGO (4.9%) groups. Freedom from repeat ablation and recurrent atrial arrhythmia at 12 months were also similar in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These real-world data demonstrate that use of the VIZIGO sheath in PAF ablation procedures allows for significantly lower fluoroscopy time and dose with significantly shorter PVI isolation time, without compromising acute and long-term effectiveness or safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16658","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures, the CARTO VIZIGO Bidirectional Guiding Sheath has previously shown promising results in reducing fluoroscopy times without compromising clinical effectiveness or safety compared with non-steerable sheaths.

Methods: This non-randomized, multicenter, retrospective cohort study (INSIGHT) aimed to determine the real-world impact of the VIZIGO sheath on procedural efficiency, clinical effectiveness, and safety in paroxysmal AF (PAF) catheter ablation. Consecutive adults who underwent de novo radiofrequency (RF) ablation for PAF with a non-VIZIGO sheath (January 2019-July 2021) or VIZIGO sheath (January 2020-July 2021) were included. Procedural characteristics, primary adverse events (PAEs), and 12-month effectiveness (freedom from repeat ablation or recurrent atrial arrhythmia) were evaluated.

Results: Of 199 patients included (mean age, 69.7 years; 59.3% male), 97 had ablation with a VIZIGO sheath and 102 with a non-VIZIGO sheath. Significantly shorter mean times were achieved in the VIZIGO vs. non-VIZIGO group for time to left PVI (18.1 ± 7.5 vs. 19.9 ± 5.6 min, p = 0.046), right PVI (16.5 ± 6.1 vs. 23.1 ± 9.9 min, p < 0.001), total PVI (34.6 ± 9.7 vs. 42.9 ± 11.4 min, p = 0.002), and fluoroscopy time (7.3 ± 10.4 vs. 18.3 ± 13.3 min, p < 0.001). Mean fluoroscopy dose was significantly lower (45.9 ± 112.0 vs. 139.5 ± 251.5 mGy, p < 0.001) with VIZIGO vs. non-VIZIGO sheaths. Catheter stability was comparable between groups. PAE rates were similar in the VIZIGO (3.1%) and non-VIZIGO (4.9%) groups. Freedom from repeat ablation and recurrent atrial arrhythmia at 12 months were also similar in the two groups.

Conclusion: These real-world data demonstrate that use of the VIZIGO sheath in PAF ablation procedures allows for significantly lower fluoroscopy time and dose with significantly shorter PVI isolation time, without compromising acute and long-term effectiveness or safety.

控制鞘对阵发性心房颤动导管消融的实际影响:INSIGHT研究。
在房颤(AF)消融手术中,CARTO VIZIGO双向导向鞘先前在减少透视次数方面显示出有希望的结果,而与非导向鞘相比,不会影响临床有效性或安全性。方法:这项非随机、多中心、回顾性队列研究(INSIGHT)旨在确定VIZIGO护套对阵发性房颤(PAF)导管消融的手术效率、临床疗效和安全性的实际影响。纳入连续接受非VIZIGO鞘(2019年1月- 2021年7月)或VIZIGO鞘(2020年1月- 2021年7月)从头射频(RF)消融治疗PAF的成年人。评估程序特征、主要不良事件(PAEs)和12个月的有效性(无重复消融或复发性心房心律失常)。结果:199例患者(平均年龄69.7岁;59.3%男性),97例使用VIZIGO鞘消融,102例使用非VIZIGO鞘消融。与非VIZIGO组相比,VIZIGO组到达左PVI的平均时间(18.1±7.5分钟vs. 19.9±5.6分钟,p = 0.046)和右PVI的平均时间(16.5±6.1分钟vs. 23.1±9.9分钟,p)明显更短。结论:这些真实数据表明,在PAF消融手术中使用VIZIGO护套可以显著降低透视时间和剂量,显著缩短PVI隔离时间,不影响急性和长期有效性或安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信